The first report of the best answer is that Confucius praised the students for taking valuable reward gifts after being brave, and the second report is that Confucius criticized the students for not being reimbursed by the government after redeeming slaves. Two students, one is to save people, the other is to redeem people, in a word, they are all good deeds; A student was criticized but praised by Confucius, and a pocketbook was praised but scolded by Confucius. It can be seen that Confucius is in favor of rewarding those who do good and not letting those who do good suffer.

There will be a question here: why do saints who have always advocated Confucian morality value money so much? Answering this question is the key to completing the composition, which involves interests and morality.

Looking at problems and doing things should take who is the biggest beneficiary as the starting point. Although the students who accept the thank-you gifts get valuable returns, the biggest beneficiaries are the country and society. Whether it is big or small is self-evident. In fact, the relationship between morality and interests is not completely opposite, but we sometimes hold high the banner of morality in our hearts, which makes us make wrong judgments on all slightly deviated behaviors.

The ancients said: "The grid is above the plum and accumulated among the bamboos; Moral confidence must be correct, and the quality is elegant and high. "Indeed, morality is a noble character. Morality is an eternal topic since ancient times. Morality is always the foundation of being a man. But when we admire morality, we tend to be too extreme, as if morality and money are natural enemies, so when evaluating whether a person's morality is noble or not, we should always focus all our eyes on money. This is irrational, even completely wrong.

In the Millennium, Professor Yuan Longping accepted the first "highest scientific honor award" of 5 million yuan. Does this mean that he has no moral sentiments? No, the popularity of two-line hybrid rice technology in Yuan Longping has helped China and the world feed hundreds of millions more people. Compared with Yuan Longping's contribution, this 5 million is really a trivial reward. The reason why our country set up this award is to let the world know that China is a country that respects talents, so as to attract more domestic talents, overseas students and foreign scientists to work in our country. It has long been self-evident that it is big or small.

At the Athens Olympic Games, China athletes made many historic breakthroughs. After the Olympic Games, the state rewarded the athletes who won the gold medal. This incident has caused a lot of discussion, and the voice of accusation has flooded my ears from time to time. But many people think that reward is a catalyst, which can motivate more athletes to create good results. We can't think that athletes lose their morality when they get bonuses. Didn't the women's volleyball girls collectively donate their bonuses to charity?

Of course, we should not forget the great righteousness, but we should correctly treat and handle the relationship between morality and interests. Under the situation of market economy, it is particularly important to deal with the relationship between morality and interests. We should not look at the issue of interests in a biased way with moral concepts, let alone treat and deal with moral issues in a mercenary way.

Dear friends, let's treat interests with rationality and maintain morality with rationality!

This material can be understood and conceived from the following aspects.

First, moral yardstick cannot be the only criterion to measure social value.

Moral identity can sometimes not be the driving force to promote social progress, because people's sympathy is innate and varies from person to person, and the system is established to maintain social stability and progress.

The standard of value needs not only compassion, but also people's reflection and good words. (There is a saying that people are furious if they don't kill.). Do people kill people out of anger? )

Second, practice.

Socrates refused the students' help before he died, because he believed that no system could be more advanced than the democracy and legal system in ancient Greece, so he chose to obey (although this was unreasonable). Because the overall environment is good, it is worth fulfilling.

Third, the role of example.

People should pay attention to the way of doing things, and pay more attention to the role of examples in the latter. It can be extended to reality, and it is easier to integrate with reality, such as celebrity effect.

Fourth, rebound pipa.

I don't care about public opinion, I just care about being worthy of morality and conscience, doing what I think is right and worth doing, being myself, free from material constraints and without secular vision.

Ps: The first two are more formal ideas, but if you lack strong logical ability and discussion level, you'd better not involve them. If the arguments are clear, advanced at different levels, with broken reasons and sufficient arguments, you can get high marks.

The third kind is flattering and doesn't require much skill. As long as the language is fluent and reasonable, you should be able to read the second kind of text without deviating from the subject.

Don't involve the fourth kind without certain writing skills, it is easy to digress and go against the original intention of the material, but if the material is used properly, it can be convincing to the first kind.