The international military establishment system has basically maintained a default system for hundreds of years. I wonder if this structure is too reasonable or people are too lazy? At present, with the great development of economy and technology, the development of military equipment is changing with each passing day. Why didn't the military establishment system develop and change accordingly? Progress in military science and technology; The use of weapons of mass destruction makes it possible for large-scale corps to destroy in combat. Then, is there any significance for the group army, division or even brigade to be established, not to mention the military region (war zone)?
In the future, the military establishment system should develop in the direction of small module, multi-function, multi-grouping, flexibility, super professional ability and changeable combination mode. In addition to large-scale linkage systems (such as early warning and anti-missile). ), the concepts of some arms and services are scattered, and the modules are named after professional skills. The leadership system is flat, grasping at the first time, making decisions at the first time, and succeeding in one fell swoop.