Second, explain the historical materials and prove which key points of this topic have been proved.
Three, put forward their own consent or new proof, and prove it.
4. What are the possible problems and what are the refutations with your evidence?
5. Compare your argument with the rebuttal argument to prove your rationality.
The above are the main points of feasibility analysis, followed by format typesetting and data citation.
Feasibility analysis is to investigate, analyze and compare the main contents and supporting conditions of the project, such as market demand, resource supply, construction scale, process route, equipment selection, environmental impact, fund raising and profitability. And predict the possible financial, economic benefits and social and environmental impact after the completion of the project, so as to put forward suggestions on whether the project is worth investing and how to carry out construction, and provide basis for project decision-making. Feasibility analysis should be predictable, fair, reliable and scientific.
main content
1. Conduct comprehensive and in-depth market analysis and forecast. Investigate and predict the supply and demand situation and sales price of the products of the proposed project in the domestic and foreign markets; Study the target market of products and analyze the market share; Study and determine the market, mainly the advantages and disadvantages of product competitors and their own competitiveness, as well as the marketing strategy of products, and study and determine the main market risks and risk levels.
2. For resource development projects, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research to determine the available amount, natural quality, occurrence conditions and development and utilization value of resources.
3. In-depth project construction scheme design, including: project construction scale and product scheme, project site selection, process technology scheme and main equipment scheme, main materials and auxiliary materials, environmental impact issues, energy saving and water saving, organization and human resource allocation of the project, project schedule, detailed estimation of required investment, financing analysis, financial analysis, national economic evaluation, social evaluation, project uncertainty analysis, risk analysis and comprehensive evaluation.
The feasibility study of the project is a research process from shallow to deep, from coarse to fine, from front to back, and repeated optimization. The preliminary research is to create conditions for more accurate research and questions in the later stage. The feasibility study should accurately implement all business risks, technical risks and profit risks. If a defect is found through research, the main risk reasons should be found through the disclosure of sensitivity parameters, and better alternatives should be found from the aspects of marketing, product and scale, process technology, raw material route, equipment scheme and public auxiliary facilities scheme to improve the feasibility of the project. If all schemes are optimized repeatedly and the project is still not feasible, the reasons should be explained in the research document. However, it should be noted that even if the research results are not feasible, this research is still valuable because it avoids the abuse and waste of funds.
In addition to the above-mentioned project feasibility study, we also have a kind of research closely related to investment in practice, called thematic research, which mainly creates conditions for feasibility study (or preliminary feasibility study), studies and solves some key or specific problems, and is the premise and auxiliary of feasibility study. Thematic studies are classified as follows:
A. Product market research: investigation, analysis and prediction of market demand and price, research on product's ability to enter the market, expected market penetration and competition, research on product's marketing strategy and competitive countermeasures, etc.
B. Research on raw materials and inputs: including current and future sources and supplies of basic raw materials and inputs, and price trends.
C. Special research on laboratory and intermediate tests: determine the applicability of certain raw materials or products and the test and test degree required for their technical and economic indicators.
D. Study on plant area and site selection: combining industrial layout, regional economy, internal and external construction conditions, supply conditions of production materials, etc. Study and select the factory and site.
E. Research on economies of scale: Usually, it is conducted as an integral part of process selection research. When the problem is limited to economies of scale and does not involve a variety of complex processes, the main task of this study is to evaluate the economies of scale of the factory, comprehensively consider the available process technology, investment, cost, price, benefit and market demand, and choose the best production scale.
F process selection research: analyze, study and evaluate the advancement, applicability, reliability and economy of various possible production technologies, especially when adopting new technologies.
G. equipment selection ... >>
Question 2: Are the conclusions, suggestions or strategies in the paper feasible and operable? 1. defense process (1) briefly describe the content of your graduation thesis. In the narrative, you should clearly state the idea (outline), arguments, arguments and discussion methods (methods) of writing this paper. It usually takes about 5 minutes. Through your narration, the defense teacher can understand the thinking process of your paper and examine your analytical and comprehensive induction ability. (2) impromptu defense. After the defense teacher asks you 2-3 questions, one of them will usually ask questions about the basic concepts and principles involved in your thesis to see if the students understand the basic concepts and principles accurately. The second question, generally speaking, is aimed at a certain aspect of the argument involved in your paper, which requires to be discussed (discussed) in combination with actual work or professional practice. Investigate the connection and help of the basic professional knowledge you have learned to your practical work, that is, the ability to integrate theory with practice. The third question, according to the students' work experience, puts forward the problems in professional theory or practice, and guides students to explore the theoretical basis or many problems and hot issues in the current professional development in combination with cases and practices encountered in work practice. Investigate students' potential professional ability II. Preparation for defense (1) Questions that students need to prepare from their own statements 1. Why did they choose this topic? 2. What is the significance and purpose of studying this topic? (academic value and practical significance) 3. How is the basic framework and structure of the full text arranged? 4. What is the logical relationship between the parts of the full text? 5. Explain the research history and present situation of this topic, what research has been done by thousands of people, what achievements have been made, what problems have not been solved, and what different opinions have been found in the process of studying this topic? How do I know these different opinions? How to deal with it? 6. Although it is not mentioned in the paper, what other issues are closely related to it? 7. What other questions have not been clarified by yourself and not discussed in depth in the paper? 8. What are the basic viewpoints and arguments of the article? 9. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this article? 10. What is the innovation of this paper? 1 1. What are the specific sources of important quotations? 12. Is this article feasible? 13. Rereading the final version, what defects did you find? 14. Experience in writing graduation thesis? Think carefully about the above questions, sort them out with notes if necessary, and write an outline of your speech for use in your defense. Only in this way can we be prepared and not panic when we get cold feet. (2) Questions frequently asked by teachers during the defense: 1. What research methods related to your major were adopted in your graduation thesis? 2. What is the core concept in the paper? Summarize in your own words. 3. What is the reason for your topic selection? What is the practical guiding significance of the research? 4. How are the core concepts in the paper reflected in your article? 5. Think negatively: What will happen if you don't do what you say? 6. What is the relationship between the theoretical basis and the main framework of the paper? What is the main theoretical basis? 7. What is the difference between qualitative research and interview, qualitative research, quantitative research, investigation and empirical research? 8. After your research, what do you think will be the result? What are the positive or negative effects? 9. What is the research perspective of your thesis? Is it management, pedagogy, psychology or sociology? 10. Is the research object of this paper an individual or a group? Is it a point study or a surface study? 1 1. What are the assumptions, actual and inevitable results of the study? 12. Are the conclusions, suggestions or strategies in the paper feasible and operable? 13. Are the subjects comparable? Whether the research framework conforms to the paper specification (rather than the logic of writing a book)! Third, the defense skills (1) Self-report and answer students must first introduce the outline of the paper, which is called "self-report". It should be emphasized that "self-report" is not "self-reading". The important skill here is to be careful not to read the report verbatim and turn it into "reading". "Scripting" is the first taboo. This part can include writing motivation, reasons, research direction, topic comparison, research scope, the latest research results around this topic, my new insights, new understandings or new breakthroughs in the paper. Be concise. Can't take up too much time, usually limited to ten minutes. The so-called "cutting the complexity and leaving the quilt clear, the painting is always familiar", that is to say, try to write the words rich and to the point. We should highlight the key points and express our greatest gains, deepest experience, essence and most distinctive parts. It should be noted here that the theme is unknown; ......& gt& gt
Question 3: How to write the feasibility of the paper, so it is mainly the focus of the topic, then
First, put forward the key points of the topic.
Second, explain the historical materials and prove which key points of this topic have been proved.
Three, put forward their own consent or new proof, and prove it.
4. What are the possible problems and what are the refutations with your evidence?
5. Compare your argument with the rebuttal argument to prove your rationality.
The above are the main points of feasibility analysis, followed by format typesetting and data citation.
I. [Basis of Topic Selection]
Academic history and research trends of related research at home and abroad;
Compared with the existing research, this topic has unique academic value and application value.
The writing requirements of this part are obviously different from the previous "Summary of Domestic and Foreign Research Status". Sorting out the Academic History is a systematic sorting out of the academic research closely related to this topic. Experts suggest that it should be sorted in chronological order, explaining the concerns, main viewpoints formed, problems solved, main academic contributions and shortcomings in each period. "Research trends" refers to the current research situation, that is, the main academic schools, which issues are mainly concerned about, what opinions are there, what problems have been solved, what academic gaps exist, and what problems need further study. On the basis of the above combing, "the unique academic value and application value of this topic relative to the existing research" shows what theoretical and practical problems your research intends to solve, what gaps your research can fill, or what aspects you can supplement and revise the existing research, and then shows that your research "has unique academic value and application value relative to the existing research". The number of words in this part should be large, not too simple, and it should be carefully combed.
Second, [research content]
Research object, overall framework, key and difficult points, main objectives, etc.
"The research object of this topic" not only shows what you want to study, but also shows the importance of this problem. Importance mainly refers to two aspects: one is theoretical importance, and the other is practical or applied importance. Focus on that aspect. Specifically, your research focuses on that aspect. Don't write something of great theoretical and practical significance. Unlimited promotion will affect credibility. It is enough for the judge to think that there is indeed a need for research. This part should be written in detail and fully demonstrated, not too simple, otherwise it will be difficult to be convincing.
The "overall framework" should not only have the basic framework of research, but also be written as "flesh and blood", not just a title. The basic framework should be interlocking, logical and follow the top-down principle. Form an overall research framework with rigorous structure and substantial content. The writing of this part is very similar to the previous "main research content", but it is more about the content of problem consciousness, which is the core part of the demonstration material and has the highest weight.
Third, [thinking method]
The basic idea, specific research methods, research plan and feasibility of this topic are studied.
Among them, we should pay special attention to the specific research methods, not only to explain the research methods used, but also to explain which specific problems are used in the research. Don't write methods that have nothing to do with this study, or the jury will think that there is something wrong with your research methodology.
Fourth, please pay attention to the format. It must meet the requirements. Please check it carefully.
The contents in the application materials are fixed and cannot be changed at will. Generally speaking, if it is not filled in according to the format requirements, the bid evaluation experts will think it is not serious. It will have a great impact on the evaluation results!
I hope I can help you, and I hope I can adopt it satisfactorily.
Question 4: How to write the feasibility of the paper? I study engineering. Our feasibility analysis is to analyze the technical environment, economy, policy and technology, so as to judge whether the scheme is feasible. And make a summary.
Question 5: Feasibility analysis of thesis opening report How to write the graduation thesis opening report and how to write it?
First, how to choose the question
What haunts me together is the repeated questioning of the tutor during the more than one year of writing the thesis opening report.
A question: "What's your puzzle?" How many times have I answered "My question is, China's?
Why can't the semiconductor industry develop? "The teacher with its unique savings to ask questions, just laughed. I am very annoyed in my heart.
Fire and regret: what's wrong with such a simple truth and such an obvious answer? !
The secret lies in the "level" of asking questions. Different from policy research reports, academic articles gather theoretical aspects and solutions.
Solve theoretical problems. A theory is a logical system composed of a series of premises and terms. Theories in specific fields have their specific generalizations.
Concept, category and research paradigm. Only under the same concepts, perspectives and paradigms can theories talk; Only through the right
Words, theory can develop. Few master's and doctoral dissertations create new theories, which is of course the best, but it is difficult.
Most of us have developed on the basis of existing theories, so when asking questions, we should be "experts" to understand.
Terms and clear logic to express. Look at my initial question, "Why can't China's semiconductor industry develop?"
This is only an exploration of phenomena, not a theoretical proposition to be verified. My theoretical proposition is: "China's industrial policy.
Is the process an elite-led knowledge process? In this proposition, "policy process", "elite politics" and "* * * knowledge.
The three terms "appeal" outline the theoretical scope and perspective of the study.
Secondly, multiple-choice questions are a process of "peeling bamboo shoots". Theoretical problems are always hidden in complex reality.
Behind it, and discovering theoretical problems requires the ability to use theoretical thinking. The training of theoretical thinking is a long-term accumulation
Process. However, novices need not be discouraged. Generally speaking, they can be divided into "three steps": the first step is to define a "xing"
Interest range ",such as semiconductor industry, information industry, rural medical care, higher education system, etc. , and browse the relevant media extensively.
Reports, * * * documents and academic articles, and find the "sticking point" or "hot spot" among them. The second step is to summarize the previous research.
Generally speaking, what theoretical perspective is used to analyze the "crux" or "hot spot" and what theoretical tools are used, such as public finance.
Perspective, social conflict paradigm, etc. The third step is to investigate the feasibility of the problem, that is, our own research space and research.
Feasibility of research. For example, can't western theories explain China's problems? Or can the same problem be solved in different ways?
Theory to explain? Or is the premise and logical deduction of the theory itself flawed? By answering these questions, I
Students find their own foothold in research. However, we should also pay attention to whether it is possible to complete our research within one or two years.
Become? Is data acquisition feasible? Wait a minute.
Finally, how to state the problem? In essence, stating the problem is the process of condensing the core idea. Views should come from the present.
Think and sum up practical problems, rather than "cutting feet and fitting shoes" in order to establish a theory. Political, Economic and Social Development in China
How to express a dynamic and rich scene with appropriate terms and accurate logic? ambitious
Beginners often come up with grand concepts or frameworks, but my suggestion is to narrow the scope of research as much as possible and clarify the research objects.
So as to clarify the memory logic of the object and ensure the completion of standard learning in a limited time.
Surgical paper. For example, "China semiconductor industry policy research" is a very vague statement, we can look at it from several aspects.
Short title: (1) time: from 1980 to 2000; (2) Objective: * * Rebels and decision-making.
Behavior, not market, enterprise, governance structure, etc. (3) Perspective: elite research in politics and * * * theory; (
4) Case: Project 908, Project 909, Document 13, Electronic Revitalization, which occurred in 1980-
Two major projects and two important documents in the field of semiconductor policy in 2000. With such a clear definition, we will
Focusing on the obvious concepts of "policy process", "elite" and "* * * knowledge", the problem will be solved easily.
Get out. At the same time, the problem is clear, and we have a clear standard when screening information and materials. In this "information"
Redundancy era can greatly improve the research efficiency.
Second, how to do literature review
First of all, we should combine "literature review" with "background description" (>:>
Question 6: Feasibility analysis of the introduction part of the paper How to write the introduction is the chapter before the text "chapter". The writing of the preface should include the research summary, and put forward the research scope and viewpoints of my thesis. 1. research summary writing a graduation thesis must have a research summary, also called a summary report. The research summary is to sort out the history, present situation and development trend of the research object of this paper, and to evaluate these studies. Determine the logical starting point of your own research and discuss what you want to do on the basis of others' research. In the dissertation I reviewed, the main problems in the research summary are too brief and lack of analysis and evaluation. Some just list other people's research works, without any analysis, and replace their own summaries with article lists. Some research reviews account for half of the whole paper, replacing their own views with reviews. 2. In addition to writing a summary of the research, the preface of the research point of view should also state your own research point of view, what problems to discuss and what opinions to put forward in the paper. Define the key words related to the viewpoint of the paper, what scope I discuss this problem and how to use this viewpoint. In this way, you can make your point clear, get to the point, and others can understand. It also avoids the ambiguity of discussion scope and keywords. The content of the preface should be clear, preferably with chapter titles. 3. General description of the research content. Generally speaking, the analysis method of dissertations follows two procedures, one is the logical analysis procedure: "analysis-synthesis", and the other is the system synthesis procedure: "synthesis-analysis-synthesis". I think it is best to adopt a systematic and comprehensive procedure, which has the function of establishing a strategic plan and outlining an outline. The first "synthesis" of the comprehensive program is the preface, which regards the research object as a synthesis and gives a general description of its own views. "Analysis" is to discuss each part from different angles on the basis of synthesis, and the results of each analysis are fed back to the next level of synthesis. The following "synthesis" is in the conclusion part of the paper, summarizing the research of the whole paper and summarizing my own thesis views. Therefore, the preface puts forward its own research point of view, which needs to further elaborate its research content as a whole, that is, to describe its discussion content systematically as a whole. This general description is equivalent to the abstract of the paper. It is convenient for readers to grasp the viewpoints and contents of their papers at a glance. This is also to prepare for the discussion in the first chapter. Perhaps some classmates will say that I have already talked about my research content in the abstract of the paper, and there is no need to talk about it in the preface. The two are different. The preface belongs to the main body of the paper and gives a comprehensive description of our research content. Readers don't have to read your abstract, but they must read your text. If you don't give a general description of your research content in the preface, you will miss an opportunity to let readers know the general appearance of your paper and increase the difficulty for readers to understand your paper. You make readers confused and can't find out what your point of view is for a long time. Readers may be unwilling or impatient if they don't understand.
Question 7: How to write the feasibility analysis of the paper in the opening report? Feasibility analysis should be what methods and means you will use to complete your research, so the content should have research methods and steps.
Question 8: I want to reply. I don't know the basic ideas of the paper and the feasibility of putting forward the ideas. What should I say? 20 points. You know how to write. Ask me.
Question 9: What is the feasibility of the thesis argumentation of judges and lawyers from the perspective of system? Judges and lawyers' association. Do you need bang's help?