Question 2: What do you want to read the empirical paper on the blind examination of master's thesis? First, the requirements for blind inspection are strict.
Strict or not depends on the strict requirements of your school itself. Blind exams are all about finding "brother colleges". The buddies who play together are very loyal. If you are serious, he is serious. If you talk nonsense, he will talk nonsense. Therefore, strictness depends on your school itself.
Second: Do you want to hand in the empirical data of blind reviews together?
Blind commentary should be a relatively complete and standardized full-text paper. If there are empirical data, there is no need for original data such as questionnaires and yearbooks.
Third: Will blind experts verify the authenticity of the data?
Blind trials will focus on the overall framework of empirical research and will not pay special attention to data. The original data is not easy to identify, but the analysis of the data will generally be verified. Mainly depends on the correctness of data processing methods and the strength of data support for conclusions (accuracy and completeness of data analysis).
Fourth: will experts rerun the data on the software to see the results during blind evaluation?
Generally, this will not happen unless the experts are particularly serious, or your data is too much, which insults the experts' IQ.
Fifth: What if there is no blind test?
Sorry, I will reply publicly after the deadline is revised and the blind judge agrees to reply. Some schools fail to pass the direct extension of defense in blind trial, which means delaying graduation.
Question 3: which is more difficult to pass, the difference between the external test and the blind test for master's thesis? How long does it usually take? Blind test is relatively difficult, it is issued by the school and sent to other provinces, and the name and tutor's name are hidden. You don't know your thesis is
Where to send it, the teacher there doesn't know where the paper comes from and whose student it is, so the blind test is more objective, about one and a half months.
. Most external audits are issued by departments themselves. Although the names of students and tutors are also hidden, most of them are sent to brother colleges with good relations in the province.
So relatively speaking, it is not as strict as blind trial. It takes about a month to a month and a half.
Writing skills of graduation thesis
First, we must first occupy and select materials around the topic.
That is to say, when your topic is determined, first, you should possess the materials around the argument and read as much as possible. Some topics come from topics that the teacher has studied. Quite a few students set their own topics, accumulate materials first, and then have arguments. Once the argument is established, go back and take possession of the material. In the possession of materials, it is similar to the basic writing I said. The first thing is to have the materials and real materials of the research object. For example, if you want to study several works of a writer at a certain stage, you should make in-depth and detailed research on these works to further determine your own arguments. If your paper is a report, not purely theoretical, but written in the form of experimental report, investigation report and summary, then your investigation materials and experimental materials should also be accounted for.
Second, we need epitaxial materials with research objects.
For example, if you want to study the writer's works, then you should study the background materials of the writer's writing, including the political and economic background, the background of literary and artistic thoughts and so on. There are also writers who talk about their own creative materials, and there are also materials that others have studied. With these materials, you can meet people and discuss the world, and you can make yourself as impartial as possible in your research. Therefore, fully possessing the materials will make your argument more complete. In this way, your argument will be deeper and wider in the future.
Third, we should choose materials on the basis of materials.
Never bring all the materials in, as long as you have them. This is a common problem when you write a paper. For example, if you write 10,000 words, you may write 50,000 or 60,000 words. Like that student just now, writing 60 thousand words is too rich. When you can't grasp it yourself, you can ask the teacher to help you and tell you what can and can't be used. More material is better than nothing, because it is always easy to delete. In the case of more materials, you choose better materials.
2. Select the paper type.
The second preparation is to choose the type of paper. The graduation thesis types are academic papers and reportage papers. For less applied disciplines, such as the study of writers' works and the study of poetry schools, it is easier to make academic papers. For highly applied subjects, such as teaching, journalism, therapeutics and experiments, papers are generally investigative or summative, and I summarize them as report papers.
3000-word papers published in magazines are usually report papers. The report paper mainly summarizes the experience. Whether it is a summary or a report, in short, we must sum up some regular things in the end. For example, the teaching experience of comprehensive learning in new textbooks has several rules: comprehensive learning can stimulate students to participate and learn actively; Comprehensive learning can stimulate students' innovative consciousness and cultivate students' innovative ability; Comprehensive learning focuses on extracurricular learning, which can strengthen the combination of in-class and out-of-class and strengthen the cultivation of ability; Comprehensive learning can strengthen students' experience and understanding of Chinese learning, and make students' emotional attitude and value orientation develop in a healthy direction. These experiences of his try to discuss theoretically and explain its significance.
Most students' papers are academic, and academic papers are mainly about a certain professional field. After full research, it is expressed in words and symbols. The basic requirement of this kind of paper is that commentators use their own knowledge to discuss and study the theoretical or practical problems of their major. Academic papers can also be subdivided into two types, one is an expository paper and the other is a comprehensive paper. The biggest feature of the so-called expository writing is that it is mainly based on discussion and has a strong theoretical color. It can be divided into argumentation type and refutation type. Argumentative type is to actively establish one's own views, while refuting type is to refute others' views. There are many comprehensive newspapers in our large newspapers and some magazines. For example, half a year has passed in 2003, and we can summarize the novels of this half a year.
......& gt& gt
Question 4: How to deal with blind trial At present, blind trial is blind trial, but actually it depends on the relationship of the tutor. Off-campus experts and professors who send exams are usually friends of tutors and the like. Everyone is mutually beneficial and visits each other. Therefore, the blind test generally depends on the strength of your tutor. If your tutor and the off-campus professor who sent you to try are friends, then you don't have to worry. Moreover, the passing rate is very important to the tutor, so there is generally no problem, and papers that are too indecent will not be submitted for review.
Question 5: What materials are needed for blind examination of master's thesis? You can pay some money for this first, and check it online first to see how similar it is. If the similarity is high, there is a suspicion of plagiarism. In this case, it is necessary to modify it yourself. Until the similarity is less than the relevant regulations.
Question 6: How to judge the master thesis blindly? Usually it will be sent to more than two tutors for review, and usually it will block your own tutor.
The teacher's evaluation results are generally
1, agreed to reply.
2. Agree to make a slight amendment and reply.
3. Revise and reply.
When all tutors choose 1, they can directly enter the defense session.
When a tutor chooses 2 and no tutor chooses 3, I will call your paper back for you to revise as required, and then enter the defense session.
When the tutor chooses 3, even if your paper fails in the blind evaluation, you need to postpone your defense. Whether you can get the right to reply after revision depends on the result of the second blind evaluation.
The opinions of blind evaluation must be taken seriously. If you want to change them, it is also very important to change them according to their opinions, because when you finally reply, your paper must have at least one blind evaluation tutor, who will definitely ask you carefully whether you have perfected all his opinions. The most important thing is that you don't know who this blind evaluation tutor is before your reply is passed.
Question 7: Do experts in blind examination of master's thesis check plagiarism, such as searching for paper keywords? Under normal circumstances, this program is necessary! Schools generally have a paper review software to check plagiarism. It can not only check plagiarism according to keywords, but also check plagiarism according to the number of quoted content. He has participated in the blind examination of master's and doctoral dissertations. Generally, he will take the paper to the office or home in advance, and then check whether there are any serious injuries-plagiarism and the like, and then he will look at logical arguments, sufficiency of arguments and so on. Because my tutor instructed me to write my thesis, I know something about the procedures inside. However, the key to this matter still depends on the quality of the instructor who participated in the blind test. If the scholarship is rigorous, it will definitely be more stringent. The specific situation is not good to generalize,
Generally speaking, the master's time is shorter and the doctor's time is longer.
I hope I can help you.
Question 8: Is it easy to blindly review the master's thesis? It depends on the degree of clerical error. If it doesn't hurt, it should be okay.
Question 9: How to solve this problem when the paper comes back from blind evaluation? There are some problems in the blind evaluation of graduation thesis, one of which is very serious. According to this blind comment, the tutor asked for an extension of three months. The next day, I read the blind comments and found many loopholes. One of the main problems is that the blind evaluation teacher only read a quarter of the papers and concluded that the experimental data is invalid. How do you know that the blind teacher saw a quarter? Here is a little explanation. This paper consists of four experiments, but these four experiments are independent parallel experiments. It should be said that the same problem is analyzed from different angles. The first part of the experiment is relatively independent, and this data is not used for the discussion of the later experiments. According to the evaluation opinions, the first part of the experiment method is not suitable, which leads to the later experiment being invalid. Communicate with the tutor to question the evaluation opinions. The tutor said that the marking teacher generally thought that the content of the paper was progressive, so when he saw the first part and thought that the experimental method was wrong, he directly denied the latter. Writing a dissertation for the first time is inexperienced. I wonder if the marking teacher puts the form of the paper on the content to judge all the papers. Is it a general marking form? Let's discuss it with experienced children's shoes. There is no precedent for the research breakthrough point chosen in the thesis research, and there is no way to learn from it. I tried a method myself. So in the course of more than a year's experiment, I also have a process of self-denial and thinking. The thesis has also been read by the tutor for at least 7 or 8 times, which is not my business for two days. The blind teacher came to the conclusion that "the experimental data is invalid" only after seeing a quarter of it, which is a bit extreme. He thinks that this part of the problematic experiment is this new attempt. But because of this opinion, the tutor decided to postpone the defense for three months, rebuild the framework of the paper and write it again. At that time, I was very entangled and a little angry. PS: Under the explanation of the master's thesis, the blind reviewer thinks this is a very serious and fatal problem, and I don't think it is necessary to "invalidate the following data". It is because the combination of the first experimental method and the third experimental analysis says that this part of the data can not be used for the analysis here, which leads to the conclusion being invalid. Of course, I understand that this data cannot be used for analysis here. At most, it is understood as unclear expression, unclear structure and lack of emphasis. I can adjust the structure and reorganize the expression. However, there are new problems in the revised scheme, and the tutor asked me to do the experimental samples again and do the basic experiments. The tutor is also very serious, and thinks that adjusting the structure is not enough. It is necessary to form a complete system on the basis, so that the blind trial has nothing to say. I don't think it is feasible. According to the workload, I should at least triple the overall amount of the paper, not to mention the difficulty of making this sample in three months or six months. I explained to my tutor that it was not feasible. My tutor thinks that my research idea is wrong and I haven't turned the corner yet. Now I just don't want his rationality and I can't start making samples! PSSS: The test sample is a bra, that is, a bra worn. Anyone who has seen the real thing knows that if it is done by hand casually, it is far from the standard of standardized production, and then it is used for precision testing, and the data taken out is not convincing! What's the use of making it! Poor communication with the tutor is the crux!
Question 10: Blind evaluation of teachers who plagiarized master's thesis shows that they are not blind, but blind to students. Teachers are beautiful, not to mention high-tech assistance. It depends on the teacher's sense of responsibility, so you don't have to be merciful.
Medical inspection directly affects the quality of inspection work, medical quality and the overall quality of the whole hospital. The following