With the rapid development of computer technology and Internet, online query, retrieval and download of professional data has become an important means of scientific and technological information retrieval. For all kinds of full-text databases or abstract databases on the Internet, abstract index is an important tool for readers to retrieve documents, which provides convenience for the construction and maintenance of scientific and technological information literature retrieval databases.
It is a comprehensive introduction to the paper, so that people can understand the main contents of the paper. After the paper is published, abstract magazines or various databases can directly use the abstract without modification or slight modification, so that readers can know the main contents of the paper as soon as possible to supplement the title.
So as to avoid misunderstandings, deficiencies and even mistakes that may occur when others write abstracts. Therefore, the quality of abstracts directly affects the retrieval rate and citation frequency of papers.
Extended data:
Matters needing attention in writing abstract
1. Don't simply repeat the existing information in the title, avoid writing the contents of the introduction as a summary, don't copy the subtitle (table of contents) in the text of the paper or the text of the conclusion part of the paper, and don't interpret the content of the paper.
2. Try to use written narrative, and don't list the data in the abstract; The words should be concise, exclude the content that has become common sense in this subject field, and delete meaningless or unnecessary words; The content shall not be demonstrated, not exemplified, and the research process shall not be introduced;
3. The content of the abstract must be complete, and the main contents (or opinions) elaborated in the paper cannot be omitted, and it should be written into a short article that can be used independently.
4. Abstracts are generally not segmented, and linking is prohibited. The statement should be objective, and it is not suitable for subjective evaluation of the research process, methods and achievements, nor for comparative explanation with other people's research.