Speaking of the story of the race between the tortoise and the hare, I think everyone has heard of it. The general content of the story is this:

One day, a rabbit will compete with a turtle. People who hear the news will definitely say that the winner is definitely not owned by the rabbit. Is this still a comparison? However, after the race started, the rabbit, who was far ahead, stopped and fell asleep ... After a long time, the tortoise slowly caught up and climbed to the finish line step by step. After a while, the rabbit woke up and thought the tortoise was behind! So, just go to the finish line. When he reached the finish line, he was stunned. The tortoise has been waiting for the rabbit at the finish line for a long time. ...

From this story, we know that the tortoise won the game, but I still think that the ultimate winner should be the rabbit. Because the winner of this competition should have belonged to the rabbit, but the rabbit fell asleep halfway because he despised his opponent and was caught up by the tortoise. If the rabbit didn't despise its opponent and take the competition seriously, it would be impossible for the rabbit to lose to the tortoise with its intelligence.

This story inspired me a lot, and I learned a lot from it. I also understand a truth: some people, like the rabbit in this story, are smart and talented. Because of my incorrect use of these talents, I was defeated in the end, but I was overtaken by people who were weaker than myself. Some people, like the tortoise in this story, are clumsy, clumsy and slow-witted, but they are not to be outdone, and they advance slowly and constantly with their limited strength, and finally surpass the rabbit in this story.

I think as long as you don't learn from the rabbit in the story, be arrogant and self-righteous, you must be the ultimate winner. (Composition of Grade Three) Description of the Proposition of College Entrance Examination Materials (5) [2009-5-314: 38: 00 | by: Hyllm] 0 It is recommended to read the following materials and write an argumentative essay of not less than 800 words. Subsequent version and enlightenment of the tortoise-rabbit race Once upon a time, there was a tortoise and a rabbit arguing with each other about who could run fast. They decided to have a game, chose the route and set off. The rabbit took the lead and ran for a while. Seeing that the tortoise was far ahead, he thought he could sit under the tree for a while, relax and continue the game. The rabbit quickly fell asleep under the tree, and the clumsy tortoise overtook it along the way, and soon finished the race and became a real champion. When the rabbit woke up, it realized that it had lost.

The moral of this story is that slow and persistent people will win the game. This is the version of the story of the race between the tortoise and the hare that grew up with us.

But recently someone told me a more interesting version. The story goes like this. Of course, the rabbit was disappointed to lose the game, so he did some preventive work (root cause analysis). Obviously, it failed because it was too confident, too careless and too hasty. If it doesn't take everything for granted, the tortoise can't beat it. Therefore, it challenged the tortoise to another game, and the tortoise agreed. This time, the rabbit went all out to run from beginning to end, several kilometers ahead of the tortoise. What does this story tell us? A fast and persistent person will be better than a slow and persistent person. If there are two people in your work unit, one is slow, reliable step by step, the other is fast, reliable step by step, so fast, a reliable person will continue to climb up in the organization, faster than the slow, step by step person. Slow down, stick to it, be quick, and be reliable. The story is endless. Now it's turtle's turn to review. It is very clear that it can't beat the rabbit according to the current game mode. He thought for a moment, then challenged the rabbit to take part in another race, but the route was slightly different. The rabbit agreed, and then they set off at the same time. In order to keep his promise to keep fast progress from beginning to end, the rabbit flew out and ran at full speed until it met a wide river. And the end of the race is on the other side of the river several kilometers away. The rabbit just sat there and didn't know what to do at the moment. At this time, the tortoise came all the way, pulled into the river, swam to the other side, continued to crawl and finished the race. What does this story tell us? Find out your core competitiveness first, and then change the venue to adapt (play) your core competitiveness. In your work unit, if you are a good talker, you must try to create opportunities, show yourself well and let oversight notice you. If your advantage is analytical work, then you must do some research, write a report and submit it upstairs. Working according to your own advantages (expertise) can not only attract the attention of people above, but also create opportunities for growth and progress.

The story is not over yet. Now, rabbits and turtles have become good friends who appreciate each other. They reviewed together, and both of them knew that they could do better in the final competition. So, they decided to have another game, but this time they cooperated with the team. They set off together, but this time the rabbit carried the tortoise all the way to the river. There, the tortoise took over and crossed the river with the rabbit. On the other side of the river, the rabbit was carrying the tortoise again, and they reached the finish line together. They are all more fulfilled than before. What does this story tell us? It's good to have excellent personal performance and strong core competitiveness, but unless you can work together in a team (with others) to control each other's core competitiveness, your performance will always be below the standard, because there are always some cases where you are not as good as others and others do quite well. Teamwork is mainly about situational (contingency) leadership, so that people who have the ability to deal with a certain situation (core competitiveness) can be the masters.

We can learn more from this story. We know that neither the rabbit nor the tortoise gave up after failure. The rabbit decided to fight again and put in more efforts. After doing his best, the tortoise chose to change his strategy. In life, when failure is imminent, sometimes we need to work harder. Sometimes you need to change your strategy and try different options. Sometimes, both will appear at the same time. Rabbits and turtles also learned the most important lesson. We will perform better when we stop competing with our competitors and start fighting for a certain situation.

In 1980s, when Guzvita took over as CEO of Coca-Cola, he faced fierce competition from Pepsi, and the market growth of Coca-Cola was being eroded by it. Guzvita's managers are all focused on Pepsi, and they just want to increase the market share by 0. 1% at a time. Guzvita decided not to compete with Pepsi, but instead to compete with the situation of 0. 1% growth. He asked Americans about the average daily consumption of liquid food. The answer is fourteen ounces. How much Coca-Cola is there? The answer is two ounces. Guzvita said that Coca-Cola needs to gain a bigger share in that market. Our competitor is not Pepsi-Cola, if we take up all the remaining 12 ounces of water, tea, coffee, milk and juice in the market. When people want something to drink, they should go to Coca-Cola. In order to achieve this goal, Coca-Cola put vending machines on every street, so the sales volume increased greatly, and Pepsi will never catch up.

Understanding: The story of the race between the tortoise and the hare inspired us a lot. Most importantly, a quick and consistent person is always better than a slow and persistent person; Work according to your own advantages (expertise); Those who integrate all resources and work as a team always beat those who work alone; Never give up in the face of failure; Finally, compete with a situation, not limit an opponent. Read the following text and write an article of not less than 800 words as required. There is an animal called sable on the Siberian snowfield. Sables cherish their white and beautiful feathers very much and are unwilling to defile them under any circumstances. So the hunters seized this weakness of the mink and sprinkled a circle of pulverized coal around its nest, so that the mink was often easily caught; Sables have not changed their habits, and they still guard their pure white and beautiful feathers year after year. You need to have a comprehensive understanding of the material, but you can choose a side and an angle to conceive the composition. Independently determine the concept, style and title; Don't deviate from the meaning of the material, don't copy it, and don't copy it. Be sure to pay attention to the requirement of "fully understanding the material, but you can choose a side and an angle to conceive the composition". Many students only see the requirement of "choosing corners" and ignore the requirement of "fully understanding materials". This requires us to grasp the whole and key points of the material and learn to extract keywords. The material is about the living habits of minks. Minks cherish their pure white feathers under any circumstances, even when they suffer from life troubles. Therefore, the focus of the whole material is to reflect the attitude of the subject and object, and we can extract the key words accordingly-persistence and guardianship; Change and adapt. Stick to what? We should stick to nature, morality, self and moral integrity. Because the material has no obvious emotional tendency, we can give it an emotional tendency to praise or criticize according to the individual's practices and results. In view of the outcome of ferrets' persistence and surrender, we can combine them dialectically and analyze our ideas comprehensively. We should not only persist, but also learn to change in time and pay attention to flexibility. When you write, you must give consideration to both, but don't divide the pen and ink equally. We should also pay attention to one aspect. [Intention scoring standard] 40 points or more (in line with the topic) 1, dialectical thinking 2, positive talk about adhering to nature, character, moral integrity, self, etc. 3, the reverse interview should be flexible, change 36 ~ 40 points in time (in line with the topic, basically in line with the topic) 1, adhere to the dream and style; 2. Give up and own, take and give up, and choose flexibly; 3. Advantages and disadvantages; Advantages and disadvantages below 36 points (digression) 1, habit; 2. Personality; 3. Wisdom (not from the hunter's point of view)