Whether it is exam-oriented education or personality education in western countries, the purpose is nothing more than to cultivate students' ability to adapt to society to the maximum extent. A "generalist" with all-round development, erudition and expertise will be more suitable for social competition than a "specialist". Many students with this "all-round" quality have emerged in the "New Concept Composition" contest. They are our real role models, not Han Han. I am worried that if I only master one subject, even if I am a "red rabbit in a horse", I will eventually miss my front hoof; Even a bright meteor will eventually be fleeting.
It seems that relying on talents is the patent of talents. It is neither objective nor practical to say that Han Han is not qualified to be a snob. Obviously, his prose has been published in major newspapers and periodicals, and his novels have been published one after another, with a growing readership. What's more, he can "carry clearly" (understand the meaning of truth) that he is a genius and claims to be the best China student in this class. But there is a limit to the sublime. You can't always arm yourself with arrogant attitude and extreme words, and keep people away. Bai Juyi, a master of poetry, once asked an old woman to comment on poetry, while Guo Moruo, a master of literature, wanted to worship the "teacher of centralized instruction". Even if you have a good education, talented people should not forget introversion. For example, it is a ball. I always wanted to make a bouncy ball. Who wants to be a glass ball with a broken head?
People who have their own opinions can join a powerful society and fight for a place for themselves, or they may fall into the trap of being blind and conceited and opinionated. I don't know which extreme Han Han, who is very independent, will go. I don't understand why a high school student who is not rich enough to make friends should spend four or five thousand yuan to travel to Tibet. Perhaps, Han Han, who did not hesitate, thought it was meaningful. I don't understand why Han Han voluntarily surrendered to subjects other than Chinese, and why he completely gave up subjects that he was not interested in. Happiness and misfortune, choice and being chosen, voluntary and helpless, voluntary and forced, everyone is struggling and struggling all his life. Although "Oh, let a man with spirit take risks where he likes", when you are not satisfied, you should not abandon your helmet, pack up and leave, or simply find a perfunctory reason. It is an eternal law that people exert their potential to adapt to the environment. It is hard to imagine that Beethoven, who is deaf, inserted a wooden stick between himself and the piano and relied on vibration to distinguish sounds, not to reach the peak in the music field, but only because of a whim.
In any case, Han Han is lucky; He's going his own way, though it's still unknown whether it's right or wrong. But as students of similar age, we must not follow Han Han blindly while paying attention to him. A new road is not necessarily suitable for others. So I think "cold and hot" should also be cold, otherwise maybe one day students will be "cold".