In recent years, graduation thesis defense skills have become hot. As a member of the defense Committee, I hope to bring you some practical defense skills to help you pass the defense quickly and complete the graduation customs clearance. Let's take a look at the defense skills of graduation thesis.
Thesis defense skills 1 1. thesis defense-familiar with the content
As a student who will take part in the graduation thesis defense, he should first have a deep understanding and comprehensive familiarity with the content of his thesis. The so-called "deep understanding" means having a horizontal grasp of the paper. These two aspects are to prepare for answering the questions raised by members of the defense Committee about the depth of the paper and related knowledge.
For example, members of the National Defense Commission may ask about the relationship between "national brand" and "famous brand" in a paper entitled "Creating famous brand products and developing national industry". Although "national brands" may not be involved in the thesis, students must have a "comprehensive familiarity" and a "profound understanding" of their own papers, otherwise there will be an embarrassing situation.
Second, the thesis defense-chart interspersed
Any graduation thesis, whether it is liberal arts or science, involves the possibility of expressing the views of the thesis with charts to some extent, so I think we should be prepared. Charts are not only an intuitive way to express opinions, but also a means to adjust the atmosphere of the defense meeting. Especially for the members of the private defense Committee, they will be rejected after listening for a long time, and they will no longer accept and absorb what you have discussed, which will have an impact on your graduation thesis defense performance. Therefore, you should properly insert charts or other media similar to charts in the defense process to improve your defense results.
Third, thesis defense-moderate language flow
Students who defend their graduation thesis are usually the first time. Numerous facts have proved that when they defend in front of many students, they often speak faster and faster, so that the defense members can't hear clearly, which affects the defense results. Therefore, defensive students must pay attention to the speed of language flow in the process of defense, be urgent and slow, be light and heavy, and not bombard the audience like a barrage.
Fourth, thesis defense-eye movement
When a graduate defends a thesis, he can generally leave the manuscript, leave it half-time, or leave it at all. But no matter what kind of construction, we should pay attention to our eyes, so that our eyes often glance at the defense Committee members and classmates at the meeting. This is a way for you to make eye contact with the audience and make them interested in your topic. At the graduation thesis defense meeting, because of the long listening time, members will inevitably be distracted. At this time, you will politely "pull" their gods back with the projection of your eyes, so that the members' ideas can keep up with you.
Fifth, thesis defense-body language assistance
Although the graduation thesis defense is mainly oral like other defenses, proper use of body language will assist your defense and make your defense better. Especially if the gesture language is used properly, it will be confident, powerful and irrefutable. On the contrary, if you stand up straight or bow your head all the time during the defense, even if your thesis is reasonable in structure, novel in theme and correct in conclusion, the defense effect will be greatly affected. Therefore, we must pay attention to the use of modality when defending our graduation thesis.
Sixth, the time control of thesis defense.
Generally speaking, in a more formal defense meeting, there is a time requirement for the debater. Therefore, graduate students should pay attention to grasping the time when defending their thesis. Time should be controlled vigorously, and the deadline will end soon. In this way, you are prepared, familiar with the mastery and control of the content, and it is easy to leave a good impression on the members of the defense Committee. Therefore, there should be a time estimate of the content to be defended before the defense. Of course, the flexible reduction or increase in the process of defense is also a manifestation of time control, which needs attention.
Seven, thesis defense-stick to the theme
There are often many debaters when defending graduation thesis on campus. Therefore, for members of the defense committee, it is impossible for them to have a comprehensive understanding of the content of each paper, and some may even be unfamiliar with the topic. Therefore, it is very important to focus on the theme in the whole defense process and finally deduce the topic. In addition, members are generally easy to ask questions about the issues involved in the topic. If you can focus on the theme of the paper from beginning to end, it will make the judges think clearly and give recognition to your paper.
Eight, thesis defense-personal use
In the process of graduation thesis defense, it will inevitably involve the use of names. I suggest using the first person as much as possible, such as "I" and "we", even if the materials in the thesis are quoted from others, and where the data or materials of "we" are quoted, especially the graduation thesis is mostly written by myself, we should use the first person "I" and "we" more decisively and boldly. If so, it will give members of the National Defense Commission the impression that everything is yours and they have done a lot of work!
Graduation thesis defense skills II. Win a battle: full preparation before defense.
1, recognize the test site.
The purpose of defense is to test whether a person's reaction is agile, resourceful and coherent, and then to test his breadth of knowledge, depth of thinking level and height of theoretical level. In the process of defense, the most taboo situation is that you can't pick up the words, you can't speak every time, you stutter, and there are many loopholes. So first of all, we should pay special attention to answering words quickly and clearly. Generally speaking, it is better to answer with the structure of "first, second and third" or "first, second and third".
2. analyze the questions.
There are generally two kinds of interview defense: objective questions and subjective questions. Objective questions have standard answers, while subjective questions may have multiple answers. Relatively speaking, there are few objective questions and many subjective questions. This provides a broad space for competitors to play freely, so be full of confidence and avoid being in a hurry. As long as they don't stray from the subject and play their level normally, they will certainly be able to pass the test calmly. If we can let the sparks of new ideas break out from time to time, the effect will be better.
3. predict the question type.
The purpose of post competition is very clear, that is, competitors prove that they are more qualified for a certain job than others by explaining and expounding their own experiences, achievements, advantages and working ideas. The judges also asked questions from these main aspects: questions related to your experience, questions related to the position you are competing for, and questions related to the current policy situation. As a competitor, you can pay attention to these aspects in advance, concretize the possible problems and summarize the key points in advance. If the questions raised by the judges are consistent with or similar to those you thought of in advance, you can talk to Kan Kan calmly; If the questions you ask are different from what you think, you can also graft wisely and assemble flexibly, and you will never choke to death on the spot.
4. deliberately set a set.
That is, in the process of competitive defense, some concepts and ideas were consciously put forward, but they were not elaborated in depth. In the process of defense, we should naturally slow down the speech and strengthen the tone to highlight these problems, attract the attention of the judges and lure them to ask questions. For example, when a competitor talked about the idea of doing a good job in market research, he specifically talked about the problem of ideas and methods, but subtly mentioned: "In addition, we should pay attention to strengthening the team building of the sales department." Sure enough, some judges broke the sand pot and asked: "What measures are you going to take to strengthen team building? This question is right in the trap of competitors. Give me a question, give you a wonderful, natural and perfect one.
Second, the artist is bold: the witty response to the defense process is full of variables. On the premise of full preparation, you should also master some contingency measures.
1, don't waste nonsense, gain time.
When the judges ask questions and you don't know where to start at once, you might as well say some nonsense and take over the topic first. If your question is good, you should seriously consider and treat it in my future work. The question you just asked is: Why is quality the lifeline of an enterprise? It is nonsense to say that quality is the lifeline of an enterprise ... but it also conforms to people's habit of answering questions. This will buy you limited time to sort out your thoughts, search the memory materials in your mind, and then explain them in an orderly way. Therefore, the role of nonsense can not be underestimated.
2, the rhetoric is correct, with static braking.
Although many jobs are different in nature, once summarized, the rules of work and measures to do a good job are similar, such as strengthening study, perfecting the system, putting measures in place and highlighting key points. For example, when the judges ask you what measures you are going to take to do a good job, and you are not familiar with this job, you may wish to get in touch with it properly so as to keep changing.
3, good words are true, control emotions.
Sometimes the judges' questions are not so much questions as opinions, but on this special occasion, if you accidentally ask them, you will not be able to step down. So when answering such questions, don't talk big, meaningless words. The best choice is to say good words, sincerely admit the shortcomings, and promise to pay attention to improvement in the future. For example, the judges asked: The general office should be a comprehensive service department. Why can leaders buy tickets on business trips, but our employees can't buy tickets on business trips? Answering such a question is not clear in one or two sentences. A competitor replied: in our work, such problems may indeed occur, and I am deeply sorry for this. I didn't do it well last time, but I will do it well next time. If you encounter such a problem, you can ask me directly and I will try my best to solve it. "A few kind words make both the questioner and the audience feel comfortable.
4. Good jokes and lively atmosphere.
Some judges ask sharp questions, forcing you to express your position on the spot and putting you in a dilemma. For example, several judges unanimously challenged a comrade who was competing for the post of director of infrastructure: Our unit will requisition 2,000 mu of land. Can you guarantee to get the land within one year? Give me $200,000. I'm not sure. Generally speaking, the problem can be solved in one year, but as far as I know, there are dozens of farmers on that land, and demolition is the most thoughtful issue in the process of land acquisition. If you encounter several nail households, the progress will be affected. But I will try to finish this arduous task in a year or so. "The first few words of the competitor caused a burst of laughter, which made the tension in close combat suddenly relaxed. The next few sentences were objective and true, which won the understanding and praise of the judges.
5, the word is not sour, adding style.
If the prose is rather bookish, the defense can be literary by expressing sui, metaphor, association and quotation, but it must be used properly to avoid giving people the feeling of elegance and bitterness. If the judges ask a young candidate: What is the most important quality for a young manager to do a good job? Some people say it is modesty, some people say it is diligence, and some people say it is pragmatic. what do you think? Although the questioner listed several answers, his purpose is obviously not to let you do multiple-choice questions, but to rule out the general possible answers and let you find another way and make new bold answers. The competitor answered brilliantly: "Modesty, diligence and pragmatism are all qualities that young cadres should possess. In addition, I would like to quote two poems by Comrade Mao Zedong to answer your question. One was written by him when he was young:' If the midstream hits the water, the waves will stop the flying boat'; Another sentence was written in his later years:' No matter how stormy it is, it is better to walk around.' For a young man, the most valuable quality is that the newborn calf is not afraid of tigers, and is foolhardy and fearless in every major event. "