In order to give some experience to the next class and avoid detours, please express your opinions.
I'll throw a brick to attract jade first.
1。 Choose the right theme. The topic lacks originality and is difficult to publish. The project I started was so boring that I made great changes.
2。 We should constantly adjust the direction of the experiment. This requires frequent reading of literature.
3。 We should keep accumulating knowledge. You can track the latest achievements published by international peers. For example, there are more and more people doing nerve regeneration now, and it is nothing new to do apoptosis unless you do it deeply. For example, Professor Wang Xiaodong has done a lot in apoptosis.
4。 Write early. You can write a preface, methods, etc.
5。 Good English sentences must be accumulated and good articles must be read. Articles in high-end magazines read beautifully.
6。 Choose the right magazine and the right critic. The process of reading literature is the process of knowing critics.
7。 Write English carefully. Most of us in China are not very good at English. My contribution was almost rejected.
8。 From experiment to writing to submission, we should be serious. Some people go blind as soon as they see the reviewers asking a lot of questions.
1: No matter whether your experiment is innovative or not, you must say that it is innovative when you write an article. You should take the time to check the literature and find out what innovation is. Sometimes you can't see anything new from the conventional angle, but when you look at the problem from another angle, something new comes.
2.SCI paper writing For us, I think we can start with imitation and try to figure out how others write. But you can't always stay ahead of others' English.
3. The drawing of the article should be exquisite. I voted for a magazine with a score of more than 4 when I was a student. One reviewer said that he didn't even want to review my manuscript. He said the manuscript was rough, but the pictures were clear and beautiful. Finally, he suggested that it be revised and accepted. Another said that my article was very meaningful, and later it was hired. It can be seen that painting can attract the attention of experts and let them put in a good word for you. EXCEL is used to make statistical charts first, and then PHOTOSHOP is used to decorate them. * * * The focused image is cut and decorated in PHOTOSHOP. Pictures are beautifully arranged, and illustrations should imitate other people's articles.
When you want to quote other people's literature, try to make it clear, under what conditions, with what methods, what phenomena are observed and what conclusions are drawn. Moreover, don't easily deny and refute other people's experimental results. That doesn't feel good.
5。 Response writing: Don't panic when others ask a bunch of questions, but solve them one by one. Quote the classics, argue with foreign experts boldly, and let him know that you are also an expert. If it can be modified, it must be modified then. If you can't do it, you can explain the difficulties and reasons clearly. In fact, I feel that foreigners are not very determined. You have to make up the experiment. Once, I contributed to a magazine with three points. I really don't want to make up the experiment, so I discussed it with foreigners for a long time.
1. Edit Close
(1) Be sure to read the submission instructions carefully and edit the text according to the requirements of the submission magazine.
(2) It is best to ask experts whose mother tongue is English to help us revise and polish the article.
(3) The chart must be clear.
2. Recommend reviewers (this is very important)
Recommend 2-4 reviewers according to the research content of the article. Consult the contact information of experts related to the content of your article before recommending, but the recommended experts should not be too awesome, and it is best to have contacts before.
Fix it.
(1) Read the reviewer's opinions carefully.
(2) Seriously answer the reviewers' opinions one by one. Even if you think an opinion is unreasonable or even wrong, you should politely reject it.
1. After the topic is decided, you should write the method, preface and discussion summary in English as soon as possible, and constantly consult the literature. With the passage of time, the progress of the experiment and the improvement of our own understanding, we should constantly improve the preface and exposition. The result can be written at the end because it involves statistical content and experimental variables. So when you finish the experiment, the article will be almost the same. The biggest advantage of this way of writing is that your preface and exposition are constantly polished, which is much better than what you spend a few days driving out.
2. Communication is very important! Communicate with the same laboratory, communicate with the tutor, and communicate with other colleagues through literature!
3. After writing the article completely, if you have enough time before graduation, it is suggested to submit a magazine that is higher than your expectation first, so that you can take your chances. Secondly, even if you don't win the prize, you will get more specific and pertinent opinions from the judges. You can improve your article in this respect, so that the hit rate may be higher when submitting again.
As mentioned above, charts are very important. Try to be beautiful and express the results as clearly as possible.
1. Read more foreign literatures related to the research direction to understand the frontier and innovation. (Introduction)
2. Carefully design the materials and methods of experimental projects before the experiment, and design as many as possible, because some projects may not go smoothly or fail during the experiment. It is particularly important to pay attention to the relevance and logic between the contents of each project. The contents of each project should be carefully linked and mutually verified.
3. Accumulate the experimental data of your own experimental content at any time, and 3-5 ideal data can be used. (result)
4. Compare similar scientific research achievements, carefully analyze your own achievements, and analyze the same and different reasons. And put forward their own views and innovations.
According to the weight level of your thesis, you decide to vote for a magazine with corresponding image factors. Of course, there are many factors that affect the decision of which magazine to vote for, including: (1) the speed of magazine publishing; (2) the boss's intention (3) the quality of the article (4) the familiarity with professional SCI magazines, and so on. Sometimes in order to publish articles quickly after graduation, high-quality articles have to be married to magazines with low impact factors.
SCI articles are not terrible. I have been a doctor for three years, and I have written four SCI articles, three basic articles and one clinical article, which have been published now. I think it is not difficult to write a few articles on the spot as long as you really go deep into a certain direction and the experiment goes smoothly. Of course, English level is very important, and language is the main obstacle, but none of my articles have been revised by the company. My first debut was printed and revised 12 times. Finally, I really didn't see any mistakes, so I threw them out and the result was 2. My other article started at 0.9, but the editor asked a lot of questions, which made it difficult to revise it. Later, another content was added and changed to A2.5. As a result, it was accepted without modification for two months.
I think the most important thing in SCI articles is innovation and logic. The so-called innovation means that you need to know the frontier of science and technology in your field. There is no shortcut. You just need to read more SCI texts in the fields you are interested in. Read more books and inspiration will come. It is definitely not possible to read the original text in PDF format. It is particularly important to cultivate the interest and habit of reading the original text. I think the biggest gain during my Ph.D. period is not that I published several SCI articles, but that I gradually developed my interest and habit of reading SCI documents in the process of pressure. I think this habit will definitely benefit myself from my major for life. I don't despise domestic periodicals. I don't want to read domestic professional articles, because I think there are too many false things in them. At best, reading domestic literature helps me quickly understand the general content of my unfamiliar research direction, rather than drawing lessons from its achievements, conclusions and even methods. SCI articles (especially those with high factors) are not 100% true, but their credibility is still very high. Therefore, it is very important to get used to reading foreign documents and using foreign materials. At present, there are many rare diseases in clinic, and no so-called "expert" has the ability to teach you. You need to search by yourself and learn nutrition and knowledge in the ocean of the world. Isn't it a very happy thing?
When I was a doctor, I was under great pressure to publish SCI articles. It was in this pressure and unforgettable torture that I developed a good habit of "using foreign materials". In this sense, I am glad that I can persist in the hard three years. As a doctor, I feel it is a pity that I can't travel freely in the ocean of world knowledge all my life. Therefore, it is not the ultimate goal for doctors to send SCI articles, but to let you have the quality, skills and ability to write SCI articles in the process of writing articles.