Academic nature is one of the limitations of the topic. The basic authors and readers of nursing papers are all nurses, which determines that the hot issue of communication within the discipline should be academic issues. Some related policies and regulations are not suitable as academic topics.

For example, in the article "On unhealthy tendencies in the promotion of nursing titles", although the unhealthy tendencies mentioned in it occur in the nursing team, the fundamental reason is the problems in the system and the management of the competent departments. This kind of problem is difficult to discuss from the subject characteristics of nursing. If the author can put forward how to carry out quantitative management in the promotion of professional titles, it may have certain significance.

There is also an article "Beware of the loss of liquid medicine during dilution". This paper is based on the problem that some clinical nurses did not discharge the liquid medicine completely when they sucked the liquid medicine in ampoules or bottles because the liquid medicine was viscous or the powder was not completely dissolved. Therefore, the author identified the remaining liquid medicine, analyzed the reasons, and proposed to strengthen the sense of responsibility to ensure that the liquid medicine was used up. The reason for this problem is simple, and there are no complicated academic and technical problems. Only by strengthening the sense of responsibility can it be solved, but it is difficult to go deep as a long article.

An inappropriate argument, an outdated argument, a repetition of known public opinion

The essence of science lies in innovation. If there is nothing new, it is called a paper. Some nursing papers still have theoretical value, but the arguments are outdated, or they repeat the views that others have discussed, or they are no different from public opinions such as teaching materials, which makes people feel boring. If a topic can be demonstrated repeatedly in many aspects, then an argument must not be used repeatedly.

For example, there is a paper called First Aid and Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Except for the topic selection, the processing steps and methods listed in this paper are the same as those in the textbook. The full text can't see the patient's situation, just list the things that should be done point by point, and can't see what treatment measures the author has taken, what nursing contents are related to this group of cases, and can't see the nursing effect. If a part of "clinical data" is deleted, it is "copying" the nursing routine or teaching materials of patients with myocardial infarction.

This argument lacks height.

The height of the paper is the performance of advanced nature, and only when the argument is high can it have a wider coverage. The thesis is not a work for self-entertainment, but for the purpose of spreading and popularizing ideas and opinions. If the argument is not high, there will be no progress and no communication value.

I once read a paper entitled "Study on Extending the Shelf Life of Spare Sterile Articles in Operating Room". The author thinks that sterilization with high-pressure steam will cause great damage to instruments and so on after sterilization of sterile articles in operating room for more than one week, so the idea of extending disinfection period is put forward. The method is to transform the original instrument cabinet into a well-sealed fumigation cabinet, and put a layer of peracetic acid liquid under it to fumigate the sterile bag continuously. Through the experimental study, it is concluded that the sterile goods can last 12 weeks. Although this practice reduces the damage caused by autoclaving, it increases the workload of basic reconstruction such as replacing instrument cabinets, fumigation with peracetic acid, and loss of liquid medicine. This practice is often not worth the loss, and it is difficult to be recognized.