Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - The historical mystery of attacking Zhou: the historical dispute about the specific time
The historical mystery of attacking Zhou: the historical dispute about the specific time
The attack on Zhou was an epoch-making event in the history of China. It is a turning point in the decline and prosperity of business. The history of this war is briefly recorded in Shangshu Pastoral Oath, which is the earliest document for us to understand this war. When did King Wu's attack take place? "Grazing Oath" begins: When Jia is ignorant, there is only a date, but there is no definite date. So it left an eternal unsolved case for future generations.

The exact date recorded in China began in 84 BC1year. Before that, the historical age must be calculated. Due to the lack of ancient historical materials, people's calculation of the age of attacking Zhou is simply impossible to verify. In Historical Materials of Ancient Studies, Hu Houxuan listed 12 statements made by predecessors: BC 1 130, BC 1 123, BC 1 122 and BC162. Before111years ago 1078 1067 10661kloc-0/50 65433.

Before 1066, according to Tao Hongjing's records of ancient and modern swords in the Southern and Northern Dynasties in "A Study on the History of Oriental Fields", it is said that it was first collected by Japanese New Town. Early Zhou Dynasty. Later, Fan Wenlan's General History of China and Qi Sihe's Chronology of Chinese and Foreign History also adopted this theory. Before 1 122, the theory originated from Liu Xin's Tianxiajing and Sanli. This theory influenced many scholars in later generations. Some people criticized Liu Xin's calculation for trying to combine the Spring and Autumn Annals, which spanned the ages and was not conducive to Xia Yizhou. There are too many subjective factors in shortening the Xia and Shang Dynasties and increasing the Zhou Dynasty. Since Liang Qichao put forward the theory of 1027 in 1922, this theory has been advocated in Yin Nian Kao and Chen's Western Zhou Chunqiu Kao.

In particular, Guo Moruo's China Historical Manuscripts adopted this theory, which has been recognized by many historians at home and abroad. This statement was originally written in Historical Records. Zhou Benji and Pei quoted Ji Zhong Ji Nian, saying, "It has been 257 years since the King of Wu destroyed Yin and even the King of You. That is to say, 257 years (77 1 year ago) from the last year of Zhou Youwang is 1027 years ago.

In recent years, people have calculated the cutting age of King Wu and put forward a new theory. Huang Baoquan and others put forward the former theory 1027 after a little advance. They are based on Mandarin. Zhou, the former king of Wu cut Yin, aged at quail fire, which is recorded in history books. TianGuanShu records that the year of 1898 and the lunar calendar are in unitary state, and the stars are in midday state. , and determine the prince of Wu in the unitary year, but used for deduction. The result dating back to 257 years after Zhou Youwang's death is not unitary year, and the closest unitary year is 1032. So, can it be determined that Qian 1032 is the year of the attack week? I can't. The chronological method used in the original history books is not accurate, with an error of one year in 86 years and exactly three years in 257 years. After subtracting the error, it is concluded that Qian 1029 is the absolute age of Wu Wang Yin Ke. According to further calculation, the battle to attack Zhou started before dawn on February 5th this year (Chronology Research by Huang Baoquan and Chen Huaxin, Journal of South China Normal University No.4, 1979).

Yuzhe Zhang, a famous astronomer, obtained the orbit of this planet 3,000 years ago by using electronic computer and planetary perturbation method. After analyzing and researching the records of Halley's comet in Chinese history, he pointed out: If the comet that appeared during King Wu's felling was Halley's comet, then the year of King Wu's felling was BC 1057 ~ 1056 (the evolution trend of the orbit of Halley's comet and because of Huai Nan Zi). "soldier's brief training" once wrote: the king of Wu cut down to welcome the new year in the east ... the comet came out and the Yin people were given a handle. It shows that Jupiter appears in the eastern sky, and there are comets with their heads facing the east. According to the appearance of Halley's Comet on April 19 19, 2000, it was found that it returned to perihelion 40 times, and it was found that Halley's Comet was very close to the earth on March 7, 2005. It can be seen in the first three months of this year, and its astronomical phenomena are exactly the same as those recorded in Huainanzi. At that time, Jupiter was running in Zhangsu, just as quail caught fire, which was in harmony with Mandarin. Zhou yue said that the king of Wu attacked Yin, and at the age of 18, he was in harmony with quail. On this basis, Zhao Guangxian believes that astronomical phenomena exist objectively and can be found regularly. It is credible to calculate the astronomical phenomena 4000 years ago by computer combined with historical data. From the textual research of historical materials, Zhao Guangxian further enriched. However, Dr. Lu Xianwen's thesis "Study on Ancient Comet Records in China" (tutor: Jiang)1July 1998 denied the conclusion.

And supported the former theory 1057, pointing out that every 257 years (historical records. Zhou Benji's Notes refers not to the year when your king died (before 77 1), but to the year when he ascended the throne (before 782). The words "five" and "seven" in 257 should be reversed, so the calculated date of the conquest of King Wu is correct: that is, 77 1 plus/.

According to the knowledge and method of astronomical calendar, He Yiqi also studied the age of the attack on the King of Wu by calculating the relevant dates in cultural relics and documents. In the calculation method, the starting point is 1980, and the calculation scale is modern astronomical constant. The tropical year (year) is 365.2422 days, and the first lunar month (year) is 29.888 days. He Yaoqi indirectly calculated the first year of Kang Wang (former 10 13) and the first year of becoming a king (former 1030) through He Ding's inscription and historical records. Zhou Benji not only suffered from King Wu's disease in the second year after Yin Dynasty, but also collapsed. ..... When the Duke of Zhou was in power, ... after seven years in power, he became king. According to the records of the Duke of Zhou who rebelled against the government and became king, it is inferred that Yin Kenian was seven years and two years before he became king. That is, before 1039, and it is inferred that the war took place on the first day of the New Year (the first month of Jiazi D).

Therefore, attacking Zhou is a successful example of taking advantage of festivals, taking it by surprise and attacking from a long distance (The Times of King Wu Attacking Zhou, Journal of Sun Yat-sen University,No. 198 1 issue).

The calculation of a historical age has aroused widespread concern, and 19 kinds of textual research results have been put forward, which is a very rare phenomenon in historical research. Although the above conclusions are quite different, but each has its own basis, isn't the age of cutting weeks uncertain? There can only be one correct age, but the exact year remains to be discussed.

(yellow) according to

According to the principle of astronomical chronology, according to the astronomical phenomena described by Lingzhou to Zhou Yu in Mandarin, Jiang et al. used the most authoritative planetary ephemeris database and calculation demonstration software in the international astronomical community to comprehensively calculate, test and demonstrate every astronomical phenomenon in this document. Combined with the relevant records such as Shangshu Wucheng, Yizhou Book History Fu, Li Chan Inscription, Huainanzi Bingxunzi Confucian School, etc. It is pointed out that a series of celestial phenomena described by Lingzhou dove to Zhou were actually arranged in chronological order during the attack of King Wu. The date of Makino Battle was determined as 65438 BC+0044 BC 65438 BC+10/October 9. See No.4, Volume 18 of Research on the History of Natural Science .. Jiang's statement that the battle of Makino was in 1044 is probably one step ahead of his predecessors. He fully understood that he used all kinds of written records and better software.