Chewing Words is an essay written by Zhu Guangqian. He told people that whether reading or writing, they should have the spirit of speaking like a book, work hard and strive for artistic perfection. In the teaching process, on the one hand, we should grasp the characteristics of argumentative writing, understand the author's point of view, and clarify the argumentation ideas; On the one hand, guide students to cultivate the spirit of speaking like a book and develop good reading and writing habits. Therefore, while analyzing and demonstrating ideas, teaching design cultivates students' habit of independent thinking, questioning and exploring, enhances the profundity and criticism of thinking, and applies this habit of thinking to their own learning. [ 1]

This article is included in the compulsory Chinese textbook for senior high school published by People's Education Press [2], and the recording is read aloud by Zheng Lan [3]. After 20 14, Jiangsu phoenix education publishing house included this article in the revised compulsory 3 of senior high school Chinese textbook, which was the first group of the third lesson text [4].

Chinese name

Pay too much attention to wording

author

Zhu Guangqian

Literary form/style/genre

essay

source

Selected Papers of Zhu Guangqian's Aesthetic Literature [5]

classify

People's Education Edition Chinese Compulsory 5 Lesson 8 [2]

quick

navigate by water/air

To annotate ...

Interpretation of terms

original text

Author: Zhu Guangqian

In Guo Moruo's drama Qu Yuan, Shan Juan scolded Song Yu and said, "You are a spineless scholar!" He listened to it himself in the audience during the performance. He doesn't feel tasteful enough and wants to add the word "shameless" under "spineless". An actor reminded him to change "yes" to "this". "You spineless scholar!" It's delicious enough. He felt that the word was properly changed. He studied the advantages and disadvantages of these two grammars. "What are you" is a simple statement, which has no more meaning, and sometimes it may be "no"; "You this what" is a firm judgment, there must be a postscript omitted. According to this view, he changed the sentence "You are a revolutionary" in another article to "You are a revolutionary"