Question 1: How to write a paper review opinion? You can briefly summarize the main contents of the paper, including experimental methods, experimental results and conclusions, and then make various evaluations. For example, the research methods used in this paper are ... and the research ... The results show that ... this paper is novel in topic selection, advanced in method, and has strong practical value and popularization value ... In the research of the same level at home and abroad, the level ... the writing of the paper is standardized, clear and distinct.

Question 2: How to write my previous doctoral thesis according to the review opinions of the master's thesis in economics? The reviewer wrote it according to the abstract in my paper, and it will be OK if it is refined. There should be some innovations written by yourself in the self-criticism book. You can refer to it Leonshane (station contact TA) first makes a brief summary of this paper, pointing out its main clues: research purpose, method, significance, innovation and so on. And then point out one or two biggest problems. If the problem is really fatal, it is recommended to modify it for a long time. Your tutor will check it for you after you finish it. If he doesn't study, I suggest you apply for a new tutor. . . Shuoyeb (station contact TA) 1. General evaluation project: the academic value and application value of the innovation achievements of the paper. The paper reflects the author's basic theory and professional level. 2. Comprehensive evaluation of all reviewers' academic comments on the paper (significance of topic selection, innovative achievements of the paper, academic value and application value, rationality and reliability of experimental results and calculated data, etc.). ) ... 3. Problems, deficiencies, opinions or suggestions in the paper. 2 ..................................................................................... LBH 535 (station contact TA) audit opinions should be combined point by point. The surface is the general situation, and the point at least reflects whether the reviewer has read the content carefully. At present, many papers are in the first instance, especially in social sciences. The comments are so general that people feel that they have not read them carefully. Qiu Qu _2002 12 (contact TA in the station) suggested to reply, and then simply write some comments. K 1000 1 (in-sTAtion contact ta) There is also an eight-part essay: The thesis shows that * * * has mastered a solid and extensive basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge in the research field, and has (strong) independent ability to engage in scientific research, and the thesis (innovation) has reached the academic level of doctoral thesis. It is suggested to organize doctoral thesis defense. If there is a prompt in the nono2009 (Station Contact TA) review form, you can write a review opinion according to several items required by the prompt. Songjm 12 (conTAct ta in the station) read the requirements of the first two pages of the evaluation book and write a comment. Is the research question clear, the research goal clear, the method appropriate and the result obvious? Is the workload full and the content substantial? Wait, the best way is to find an old doctoral thesis and copy it down. Stereotyped writing ~ ~

Question 3: How to write the paper review comments? Please refer to the following aspects to evaluate the quality of the paper. You can refer to the following evaluation criteria: (1) Thesis selection and evaluation: theoretical significance or practical value to national economy, scientific and technological social practice, whether reading is extensive, whether evaluation is comprehensive, and whether domestic and international trends are grasped (20%); (2) Basic theory and professional knowledge: whether there is theoretical analysis and experimental verification, whether the demonstration is accurate, whether the results are outstanding, whether the workload is sufficient, and whether there is a solid and broad basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge (30%); (3) scientific research ability and creativity: whether there are new ideas, arguments and achievements reflect strong scientific research ability and creativity. (40%); (4) Writing ability: whether the organization is clear, whether the level is clear, whether the paper format is standardized, and whether the style of study is rigorous (10%).

Question 4: How can I write my previous doctoral thesis without the opinion of thesis review? The reviewer wrote it according to the abstract in my paper, and it's OK to refine it.

There should be some innovations written by yourself in the self-criticism book. You can refer to it Leonshane (station contact TA) first briefly summarizes this paper and points out its main clues: research purpose, method, significance, innovation and so on. And then point out one or two.

Question 5: How to write the evaluation opinion of the dissertation? In the last part, we mentioned the common problems of students in choosing materials. It can be said that the selection of materials is a hurdle for writing papers, and many students fall here. We say that innovation in material selection can not only create perfect characters, but also pay attention to that innovation in material selection does not mean describing the dark side of society.

Question 6: How to write the evaluation opinion of master's thesis? Where are you going to write your interim report and task book? Did the teacher approve the topic selection? Is there an outline for the teacher to see the writing direction?

Did the teacher tell you which direction to write the paper? Be sure to write an outline before writing a paper, and let the teacher determine the framework to avoid big changes in the process of revising the paper in the future! !

Pay attention to the format requirements and writing specifications of the school, otherwise it is likely to be returned for revision. If you still don't understand or know nothing, you can ask me. I hope you can graduate smoothly and move towards a new life.

My thesis was completed under the guidance of my tutor, starting with the topic selection, collecting information and writing an outline of the thesis.

The first draft of the paper has been basically completed and achieved phased results.

My thesis mainly studies the differences of euphemism from the perspective of politeness principle. By using writing skills such as comparison, analysis and examples, I sum up the differences in the use of euphemism in Chinese and English life and how to use euphemism better, so as to achieve the purpose of making cross-cultural communication smoother. In the data collection stage, I spent a lot of energy and time reading, watching movies, thinking, analyzing and sorting out, because there are many related materials and documents, and on what basis, I need to collect a large number of novel examples. Next, according to the expected work progress, the next step is to make basic changes to the text, format and content of the paper to simplify and sublimate it; Secondly, I need to read more references and find examples to support my argument. Then I need to sort out my thesis under the guidance of my teacher and see if I can find some innovations to make my thesis more brilliant.

Question 7: Help the tutor review the paper. After summarizing, the writing of subject words is a new vocabulary of information retrieval language, which is used to describe the theme of literature and carry out information retrieval. It is precisely because of its appearance and development that it is possible to computerize information retrieval (computer retrieval). Keywords refer to words or phrases that distinguish things by the characteristic relationship of concepts, express in natural language, have collocation function and accurately express the dynamic semantic conceptual relationship between words.