Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - You shouldn't teach fish to swim. How to demonstrate the urgent need of attack and defense in the debate
You shouldn't teach fish to swim. How to demonstrate the urgent need of attack and defense in the debate
You shouldn't teach others how to argue. You should find your own argument!

Find relevant allusions! Philosophical story!

Finally, give your opinion.

There is no right or wrong in the world.

You name it, and I can give you a negative example.

How does it make sense? Let's see who speaks brilliantly.

Zhuangzi and Mencius are walking by the river. Zhuangzi said, Look how happy the fish in that river are!

Mencius said: how do you know that fish is happy if you don't eat fish?

Zhuangzi said: You are not me. How do you know I didn't know the fish in the river were happy? Our view is that we shouldn't teach fish to swim.

First of all, I want to know if your vanity is at work. You must show how powerful you are. Is it necessary? It's better to be modest. Don't show how capable you are in front of your predecessors. Just like you and your parents. You will always be their children. Don't tell your parents how tired your family or children make you, because you have grown up in the sky that they used to support with sweat. (Do you know? It's a child. Of course, people can behave appropriately as follows, otherwise how do you know you are capable? I don't deny this, but China is a country of etiquette. At the very least, we should respect our predecessors. You showed your ability in front of your founder so bluntly and told him that he was old and dying. He is not as creative as you. Lian Po is old, can she still eat? Without what they left behind, you would have achieved what you are now! "The waves behind the Yangtze River push the waves before, and the generation is stronger than the generation." There are still many people who are better than you, so why don't you study with that person, but show your ability in class! No one has the desire to express, but think about it, if no one cheers, what's the point! Do you like narcissism?

Answer supplement "example:

Lei Feng ... "

Have no desire to perform

People should do what they can, even if they have the ability, should they show it to others? Do it with an open mind, in case someone doesn't know?

Lei Feng is such a person, isn't he?

If you want to do something beyond your ability, what a terrible thing it is! Think of a doctor who has just stepped onto the operating table, and boldly do an operation that he is not sure or full of achievements because he is afraid that others will say that he is incompetent or want to show it. That's a terrible and sad thing!

Say allusions:

King Yue Hook: Sleeping on the salary and tasting the courage.

If you want to play dead,

If you have your own ideas, I will tell you so much when I am ready. Search without searching from the internet, hehe!

Lazy, what is born?

Debate whether the school should open a shop. How to refute? If I wanted to, most adults wouldn't let their children eat snacks. Although it is right, they can eat less, but they can also not eat. Some children gain weight by eating snacks. .

Ask the offensive and defensive questions in the debate urgently, and ask the defensive friends of the other side.

Hello, opponent's debater.

I want to ask you a hypothetical question.

If you are going to get married soon, the invitation to the party will be ready tomorrow. At this time, you only have one plane ticket to Sydney and one ticket to Sydney Opera House, which has been envied for a long time.

Will you go?

The other party replied: yes, it will arouse the resentment of the judges and the audience.

No.-this proves our point. Thank you very much for your defense.

I suddenly thought of an inappropriate question. I hope I can help you.

Teach people how to teach people how to teach people how to teach people how to show off their skills in front of experts. The embryonic form of this idiom began in the Tang Dynasty and was refined in the Yuan Dynasty. Liu Zongyuan, a writer in the Tang Dynasty, said in the preface to Wang Dui's Poems: "Holding an axe at the door of the class is strong." Ban refers to Lu Ban, a famous carpenter in Lu during the Warring States Period, who was good at making exquisite utensils. It should refer to the craftsman stone in the capital of Chu, and also a carpenter with unique skills. In Zhuangzi and Xu Wugui, it is said that a craftsman can cut off the white powder as thin as a fly's wing on the tip of his nose with a big axe, but his nose is not damaged. Liu Zongyuan's words mean: it's shameless to fiddle with the skill of using an axe in front of Lu Ban and Jiang's door. Guan Hanqing, a dramatist in the Yuan Dynasty, also said: "Teaching axes is only a joke." Guan Hanqing's words mean: teach fish to swim, leaving only ridiculous ones. It can be seen that from Liu Zongyuan to Guan Hanqing, they did not advocate teaching fish to swim, but despised teaching fish to swim. In the eyes of the predecessors, teaching fish to teach fish to play tricks has simply become synonymous with overreaching.

However, today, should we advocate teaching fish to swim?

In human history, there are many people who dare to teach axes, and Newton is one of them. Young Newton worked out his first law of motion after careful calculation. At that time, he was just a little-known person, but this truth-seeking Newton immediately ran to the Royal College of England and published his research results in front of many scholars. However, what Newton got at that time was a sneer: "Crazy! Crazy! " Why do those scholars say that? Because they think Newton is playing tricks on others. But historical facts tell people that it is this "fanatic" who became a master of science that will be praised by the whole world.

For a teacher like Newton, we must first affirm his courage to fight with experts. Knowing that I am an expert, I have to compare with you and stand up to overwhelming criticism. "Many people talk about the golden change, and there are no bones left." How many wizards have disappeared in the abyss of human speech in past dynasties. However, people who teach axes can move forward despite difficulties. "Go your own way and let others talk." What courage it is!

Indeed, if you want to improve your professional level, you must be a teacher. Mathematician Hua put it well: "If you want to play with an axe, you must go to the door." Because only by comparison can there be recognition. How capable is "Luban"? How much worse than you? Only through comparison can we find out the gap, learn from each other's strong points and make our technology gradually approach "Luban" or even surpass "Luban". Therefore, those who have the will should boldly find "Luban" to compete and explore again and again, and the gap will become shorter and shorter, and the level will continue to improve. After knowing Han Yu, a great writer in the Tang Dynasty, Jia Dao showed him every article he wrote, asked him for advice, and even competed with him to write poems. He made great progress in learning and eventually became a great poet. It can be seen that teaching people to fish is conducive to the improvement of professional level. Ancient Confucius advocated that learning should be "not ashamed to ask questions". In today's reform and opening up, we should advocate "teaching others how to do it, so we should teach others how to do it". Asking questions without shame is really a way of learning. It's helpful to ask questions if you don't understand. However, people who know less than themselves can't learn much from them. If you teach an axe and ask Luban questions, you will get more. Otherwise, how can you call him "Luban"? Therefore, it is more conducive to improving the professional level than asking questions without shame.

In fact, it is also good for Luban to teach others to play with an axe. No one is perfect, and experts are not omniscient. Compared with "thugs", they can not only find their own shortcomings, but also exchange experiences and learn from each other, which is undoubtedly more conducive to in-depth research and discussion of problems. Teaching others how to teach others how to swim also helps to find talents. How to prove it? If Faraday hadn't recommended himself as David's assistant, the history of electromagnetism would have been rewritten. "Axe juggler" dares to make his talents public and serve the public, and he is also worthy of being a talent. In fact, it is teaching others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to do things. 2 1 century is an era of rapid progress of human society, and science and technology are developing at an alarming rate. Whether our country, our Chinese nation, will be eliminated by the times depends on how hard every Chinese son and daughter works. In order to rapidly improve our professional level, become truly useful talents, and become the driving force for China to take off, we should dare to teach others how to teach others how to swim.

A brief comment on the traditional concept of "teaching others how to teach others how to teach themselves how to do things", the author can re-examine it with Marxist standpoint, viewpoint and method. In the article, he taught others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach themselves how to teach others how to teach themselves how to teach others how to teach themselves how to teach others how to teach themselves how to teach others how to teach themselves how to teach others how to teach themselves how to teach others how to teach others how to teach themselves how to teach others how to teach them how to teach others how to teach them how to teach them how to teach them how to teach them.

Crying is not as good as laughing, it can clean eyes, make laughter grow wrinkles, and crying can relieve mood.

I can't help it Laughing is much better than crying. Why are you arguing about this?

You have been asking for help in the debate for several days. The debate was good, but no one answered. What happened?

I think it's about "asking for a debate draft, including: opening statement ...". I don't think it will help you to give you a complete written speech directly.

It's not that I can't give it to you The problem is that you follow other people's advice and do it. Are you taking part in a debate contest or a speech contest? !

I always think that it is important to activate thinking, improve ability, flash wisdom in the competition, and improvise in the preparation process-not for any champion or first place. ...

Maybe many people have the same idea. ...

I wish I could "teach people to fish" instead of "teach people to fish"

I only give you "materials". As for how to make the "material" delicious, it's entirely up to you.

===========

A lot of nonsense, get to the point:

To say "heteronomy", it can be said that everyone always has something he can't see and must rely on the help of others.

Like your back, you can't see it without the help of others or tools.

In life, there are many blind spots like "one's back". No matter how strict you are in self-discipline, there are always some things that you can't do well by yourself.

Even Confucius "visited the body three times a day" and spoke highly of the way of "being happy when you smell it"

===============

Perhaps we can really regulate our behavior through self-reflection when we practice to the realm of Kong Old Master Q, but as middle school students, obviously, we can't reach this realm. ...

Middle school students, at the age of youth and vitality, can't be as self-disciplined as mature adults-because young people should try boldly and learn. This is also one of the reasons why middle school students have hope for the motherland in our nature (if middle school students in a certain place are old pedants, is there still youthful motivation in this place? )

Therefore, for middle school students, the role of heteronomy is obviously greater than self-discipline-because to explore and try, it is inevitable to cross the border and step on the line. At this time, heteronomy will help us achieve better results within a safe range and on the premise of rationality and legality.

For example, like a ball game that middle school students like to watch, why should there be a referee? It can't be said that all the players are unconscious and don't know how to be self-disciplined, but once the game is fierce, it's natural that you can't see whether the ball is out of bounds, whether you or others are offside ... Because the players' energy is on the ball, at this time, if there is no heteronomy of the referee, the game will definitely not go on ... The self-discipline of the players is important, but it can't rely solely on the self-discipline of "revolution depends on consciousness". On the contrary, only the existence of appropriate heteronomy can ensure that everyone is there. ...

Note: heteronomy helps us, not restricts us. A person who knows how to make good use of the help of other laws is more likely to succeed-for example, Li Shimin and Emperor Taizong. It can't be said that he doesn't want to be a wise monarch. However, if he can't tolerate Wei Zhi's strict heteronomy, without Wei Zhi's help, he certainly can't reach such a height!

Well, there are examples and theories. As for the beginning, the end and the summary, you must rely on yourself!

I wish you success-not just winning or losing the game!

The so-called "attack" is to find the flaw of the other side and attack.

Generally from the following aspects:

(1) attack the other side's point of view

(2) attacking the logic of the other party (reasoning errors can be reduced to absurdity and reduction to absurdity).

(3) Attacking the opponent's argument (the cited example is wrong-the example itself is wrong, or the data is wrong, or the time and place are wrong, or Zhang Guanli Dai, etc. ); Examples can't prove the point)

(4) The contradiction between several debaters attacking each other.

Women who don't have private money are almost the same, and women who have private money have different uses.

Men become bad when they have money. Although this statement is biased, there is always some truth. Men are rich and don't know how to make progress. If they play with women, they will definitely do it. If they don't do it well, they will devote themselves wholeheartedly. At this time, if a woman doesn't have any private money, she will certainly suffer.

Men should make friends, and women also have their own life circles. If you want to communicate, you must use money. If a woman saves all the money from her family, can she spend it? If that money is your own private money, it will be very different to spend, and you will be generous. Won the face, won everyone's heart, and your man's face is glorious.

This is the happiness of women saving private money. Totally narcissistic. It's hard to describe how the numbers in their bankbooks keep growing.

About teaching others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach others how to teach them how to teach them how to teach them ~ ~ ~ Those who come to Baidu for debate are unlucky people ~ ~ ~

The other side must have attacked from "breaking the old and establishing the new" or "daring to challenge"

It is estimated that Copernicus and religion will be used to say things ~ ~ ~ (I can't say for sure)

elegant

We can start from "doing what we can" instead of "cowardice" or "sticking to the rules"

(that's a bit abstract ~ ~)

Make a big axe in front of Lu Ban-

Don't provoke in front of people who are better than yourself.

That kind of behavior is like a moth to the fire and arrogance.

hum

That will do.

Don't forget not to be bypassed by the other side in his example.

As long as he gives every example.

You should try your best to find fault with his case and correct that his case deviates from the argument-or does not meet the requirements of the argument. Anything will do anyway.

As long as you rigidly focus on the debate between the strong and the weak-the so-called brave argument can't beat you.

I am also a member of the debate team.

I think

Refutation: an article can last forever, isn't it passed down from generation to generation? Not all good articles can last forever, and some shocking works are bound to be lost in the long river of history. If they want to be told, don't they use eloquence?

Therefore, if a person wants to show his literary talent, he needs the help of eloquence (you can also think of it this way: a person's' literary talent'-the quotation is just to say that it is best not to be called literary talent at this time. I can't figure it out. Think for yourself-you can't be called a literary talent until you are told by others. In other words, eloquence is the premise of literary talent. Without people's recitation and eloquence, there is no literary talent. )

2. Q: (1) In today's arena, didn't the other debater argue with us by your eloquence?

(2) thank the other debater for making such a seemingly incisive point of view, so I want to say that it doesn't depend on your outstanding eloquence?

Sophisticated: Literature is a hidden eloquence.