The new curriculum reform requires students to have their own unique views and show their own personality style. Argumentative writing plays an extremely important role in senior high school composition teaching. Different people have different views on the same topic. However, it is not enough to have only one idea. These ideas need to be expressed in a certain form. To complete a normative argumentative essay in a short time, it is naturally inseparable from the guidance of methods. "Deliberation" is a practical and effective way of thinking, which maximizes students' potential and advantages in argumentative writing and makes students' compositions in the examination room more standardized and excellent.

First, the concept of "exposition method"

The so-called "exposition method" is a way of thinking that defines the attribute of the central argument and expounds its meaning with three or four sub-arguments. Then, the process of putting forward sub-arguments and demonstrating them is a major link. The key to the rational construction of the three major sectors is to allocate three sub-arguments. "Elaboration method" can completely achieve the purpose of refining and expressing sub-arguments, and then complete the construction of a complete and clear structural framework for normative argumentative papers, and can also elaborate the central arguments from multiple angles and in depth.

Second, the application of "exposition method"

In the process of composition examination, we should focus on "what" and "how". "What is it" is the theme of the composition, that is, the central argument. "How" is not only the conception of the composition, but also the structure that makes the central argument stand. Then, how to make the central argument clear, prominent and profound involves the guidance and training of students' thinking methods.

The first is the thinking method of defining the attribute of the central argument. "Attribute" refers to the nature and characteristics of things. The attribute of the central argument can be said to be the essence and connotation of the central argument. Limiting it is the process of locating the argument reasonably and accurately. In addition, statements are usually used to express sub-arguments.

In writing on the topic of "degree", students put forward that "degree" is a yardstick to measure the value and significance of life. It uses some arguments to define its connotation: 1. Selfless dedication is a kind of "degree" of life; 2. Self-confidence and self-improvement is a kind of "degree" of life; 3. Integrity and kindness is a kind of "degree" of life. Another example is the composition entitled "Learn to be grateful". After students lead out the central argument that "people should know how to be grateful", they define its essence with some sub-arguments: 1 Self-achievement is gratitude to parents; 2. Serving the motherland is gratitude to the country; Giving back to the society is gratitude to all mankind.

In the attribute of the central argument, students are required to refine and express the sub-arguments reasonably and accurately. Among them, the ability to limit many aspects of the design center argument needs many trainings to improve.

Secondly, it expounds the thinking method of the meaning of the central argument. Meaning is the value and function of things. The significance of the central argument lies in its function, and it is mostly beneficial.

In the composition entitled "Talking about Harmony", students put forward: "We need harmony." It is also explained by a set of arguments: 1. With harmony, people will respect and love each other, unite and cooperate; 2. With harmony, man and nature will live in harmony and develop in a balanced way; 3. With harmony, people and society will be in their proper places and make progress together. Another example is writing on the topic of "giving up". Students lead out: "In life, we often have to give up some to get more." Some arguments are used to clarify; 1. Let go of the temporary and material, and you will gain eternity and enrichment; 2. Let go of superficial and superficial things, and you will gain something profound and meaningful; Let go of ease and emptiness, and you will gain glory and truth.

In the sense of the central argument, students can focus on the role of the central argument. This not only makes the thinking of the article clear, but also highlights the center of the article, which can be described as killing two birds with one stone.

Finally, students need to ponder over the two aspects of "exposition method", and at the same time, they should not only be satisfied with putting forward sub-arguments, but also be justified. The latter needs more efforts and accumulation.

Third, the role of "exposition method"

The requirements for standardizing argumentative writing in college entrance examination are: clear thinking, complete and rigorous structure, profound views and clear and prominent center. If you want to finish a normative argumentative essay in a short time, you must first have a clear central argument, but it is impossible to have a train of thought. A good idea needs a reasonable and complete structural form to carry and present. "Deliberation method" can not only make the center of the article stand out, but also make the structure of the article complete and rigorous. Of course, you will also receive clear thinking and profound views. It can be said that it is twice the result with half the effort.

In the teaching of argumentative writing in college entrance examination, we should first teach students some thinking methods, so that students can have "laws" to follow when facing different topics. A lot of practical and reasonable guidance and training can really improve students' ability to write standardized argumentative papers. (Wu Meijuan)

The above article may be helpful to you. Please accept it if you are satisfied, thank you!