1, the name of the paper

The title of the paper should well summarize the main content of the paper and express the theme of the paper, but at the same time, it should be noted that the title of the paper should not be too big, otherwise it will not be easy to write in depth.

2, the author's signature and unit

The contents of the signature and the unit shall be true, and no aliases or falsifications shall be allowed.

3. Summary

As a summary of the article, it should be highly summarized and concise, covering the purpose, method, result and conclusion of writing. In this part of the abstract, there is no need to list charts, quotations or abbreviations. Generally, it is an independent chapter with 200-300 words.

4. Text

The text is divided into preface, central part, summary part and reference part. The preface is simple and clear, just point out the theme; The central part requires careful reference to other people's information, with positive opinions written in the front and negative opinions written in the back, and it is not allowed to write only one-sided views; The part should briefly summarize the main contents of the article; The reference section needs about 10-20 articles.

5. Keywords

Key words should reflect the main content of the article and let readers understand the theme of the paper. A paper can have 3-5 keywords, which can be selected from the text, abstract and article subtitle. Pay attention to the original words of keywords, use standardized language, write a space between keywords or separate them with semicolons, and there is no need to add punctuation marks at the end of the last keyword.

The writing points of literature review

1, read a lot of literature.

Before writing a summary, we must collect information comprehensively. If we can't systematically and comprehensively grasp the research status quo, or unilaterally understand other people's research results, and blindly think that a certain problem or field has not been studied, it will make our own research a repetitive work, or the brain hole is too big, and the feasibility of the paper is not high.

2. Comprehensive analysis

Review can't just list the views of predecessors without systematic classification, induction and refinement. If it is "comprehensive" rather than "narrative", then even if the content is systematic, it is only a statement of other people's views at best, and it cannot achieve the purpose of finding and establishing the theme of the paper through analysis and comment. You can use the "filling method" to write a literature review. In short, you can draw a guide map, list a framework, and constantly refine the content.