Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to write the tutor's evaluation of the progress of students' papers?
How to write the tutor's evaluation of the progress of students' papers?
Creative thinking: whether the viewpoint is correct and distinct; Whether the argument is sufficient; Whether the analysis is comprehensive; Whether the structure is reasonable; Whether the statement is fluent; Whether there is realistic guidance.

The structure of the full text is basically reasonable and scientific, the logical thinking is clear, the viewpoints are expressed accurately, the language is fluent, the argumentation method is reasonable, the references meet the theme requirements, the theme and content meet the professional requirements, and some parts are closely related to the sub-parts, but individual quotations are not marked, and there are not many truly innovative contents, and some concepts are vague, which generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.

The structure of the full text is basically reasonable and scientific, the logical thinking is clear, the viewpoints are expressed accurately, the language is fluent, the argumentation method is reasonable, the references meet the theme requirements, the theme and content meet the professional requirements, and some parts are closely related to the sub-parts, but individual quotations are not marked, and there are not many truly innovative contents, and some concepts are vague, which generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.

Text:

The topic conforms to the professional goals and characteristics, and is very targeted and practical. The structure of the article is reasonable, the level is clear, and the relevant documents and materials cited in the writing are closely related to the theme, and the reference materials are relatively new.

In the process of writing, the author makes good use of Taoist professional knowledge for analysis, and in the process of argumentation, he mainly uses theoretical argumentation and factual argumentation. However, the shortcomings of the article lie in the unclear expression of sentences in the language, insufficient argumentation and insufficient innovation.

The structure of the full text is basically reasonable and scientific, the logical thinking is clear, the viewpoints are expressed accurately, the language is fluent, the argumentation method is reasonable, the references meet the theme requirements, the theme and content meet the professional requirements, and some parts are closely related to the sub-parts, but individual quotations are not marked, and there are not many truly innovative contents, and some concepts are vague, which generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.