Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Three basic structures of argumentative writing
Three basic structures of argumentative writing
Three basic structures of argumentative writing:

1. Parallel type:

And sub-arguments: (central argument-point argument 1 point argument 2)- sub-argument 3- conclusion, refer to the full text) (2) parallel arguments: (-introduction,-conclusion)

2. Comparison formula:

Pros and cons: (put forward the central argument-,affirmative statement-,negative statement-)

Step by step (step by step)

Argumentative Paper (1)-Hierarchical Structure

Layered articles usually have three formats:

(1) Decompose the central argument into several sub-arguments, and the relationship between these sub-arguments is from simple to profound and from simple to complex. Interlayer can be crossed with related words.

Horizontal, such as "not only that. There are also "You" and "You Shuo", which can reflect the progressive relationship between layers.

Example: dissect yourself strictly.

1, to make continuous progress, we must ruthlessly "dissect ourselves"

2. Discuss how to "dissect" yourself.

Self-knowledge. (This is the premise of "dissecting" yourself. You can't make a knife if you don't know where the disease is. Self-knowledge is not enough, we should be brave in self-criticism.

This is the way to dissect yourself. You won't get sick without surgery. The courage of self-criticism comes from the pursuit of truth and lofty belief. (This is the key to dissecting yourself. It's really hard to get sick if you don't master the operating rules and can't open the knife well. )