1, educate people and educate yourself.
In the process of educating children, we should always reflect on ourselves. Parents are the first object of children's learning and imitation, and family is always the first battlefield of education.
In the process of getting along with children, I often tell myself to calm down when his patience is worn away, and then calm down, I can always find my own problems.
So, I will tell him that dad is not good enough, and we will get better together.
We should grow up with our children.
2. Dealing with children's problems and controlling emotions is the first priority.
Parents often unconsciously put themselves in a strong dominant position when communicating with their children. "No matter what I say, you must listen to me.
"If you can't control your emotions, you will fall into your own troubles and anxiety. It's hard to think from the child's point of view, only thinking about the child's mistakes, you can't think of the real reason of the problem.
3. Be patient.
Many problems of children are stage problems.
As you grow up, the problems will gradually disappear.
Don't have too much desire for control, control the education of big life principles and values, and learn to let go of many other small things.
{{{{{{{{
Greg Semenza, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 20 19, was found to have forged 40 papers, with a time span of 18 years.
1. How to falsify the paper?
Most of the pictures of the experimental results are PS.
2. Peer review system There is a big difference between biological experiments and chemical experiments, that is, there are many uncontrollable factors. In order to make your work more meaningful, you should beautify your work, your results and your data.
Fuzzy experimental results are "processed" into "significant results" by formal mathematical means. "
When editors and reviewers of journals demand that their conclusions should have sufficient support, most of scientists are trying to meet the requirements of editors.
Even the extreme situation may be that even if the editor says the wrong direction, scientists should try their best to revise the paper according to the editor's requirements in order to publish it in large journals.
3. It is a strange phenomenon for the author to register in European and American scientific research circles. Some researchers will call the authors everywhere to increase the number of papers.
Now there are some cases of serious fraud, and every article will have the first author 46 * * *.
You still can't understand why a Nobel Prize winner does this, because low-level researchers are full of motivation.
In fact, this is beyond Semenza's personal control. Even if he doesn't want to, he will get involved.
Otherwise, he will become a celebrity in the circle and kick down the ladder.
It is estimated that people in China today are quite familiar with these phenomena in the scientific research field. This kind of thing that everyone goes into the water together, from the government to the state-owned enterprises, can be found everywhere. The only difference is that the scientific research circles in Europe and America are for academic fame, while the government and state-owned enterprises are for low money.
What scientific research originally needed was creativity, practical ability and academic ability. According to this peer review system and fraud model, what is needed becomes imagination.
It is a way of thinking that everyone should pay attention to avoid before finding evidence, but it has become the way of thinking and livelihood of these scientists. It's really embarrassing.