The six-step method of argumentative analysis and reasoning Many students find argumentative writing easy, but it is difficult to write well. Their argumentative papers are unambiguous (clear), incomplete in structure and insufficient in arguments. Their shortcoming is that they are not good at analysis and reasoning, so that arguments and arguments cannot be organically combined. But how to analyze and reason is a problem that students feel unable to start. Therefore, in order to improve students' argumentative writing level, it is necessary to strengthen the training of analytical reasoning ability. Look at two paragraphs first: the first paragraph makes people score three points. (2) Lin Xiangru, for example, was a public servant of the eunuch leader, with humble origins and humble status. However, he defended the dignity of Zhao and Wang Zhao at the "Return to Zhao in one piece" and "Mianchi Club", and made great contributions to Zhao. He became a doctor first, and then he was promoted to supernatant. Although "in the same column" as General Lian Po, it is "on the right side of Lian Po". This made General Lian, who was born in a famous family and had a prominent position, rather unwilling. He not only degraded his credit, but even insulted his personality. He said that Lin Xiangru was just a "vain" and "unknown bitch" and threatened that if I saw each other, I would be humiliated. And like facing general Lian, he is not surprised or afraid, and he is humble everywhere. In court, he said he was sick and "didn't want to compete with Lian Po". Even if he meets, he will "lead the car to avoid." Xiangru's humility was not understood by his disciples at first, so he didn't take Xiangru seriously, threatened to suspend his job, instigated Xiangru to fight with Lian Po, and gave him evil spirit. Lin Xiangru made a surprising remark: "I dare not add troops to Zhao, only I am here." "I was so anxious about it, and then I had personal hatred." Hearing this, Lian Po was moved by Lin Xiangru's self-effacing personality and broad mind, and went to the door to apologize, thus becoming a close friend and being passed down as a story for thousands of years. Therefore, being good at tolerance does not mean being inferior. There is a saying in the ancients that "let half a sentence go far and take a step back." Think about it and you will have a certain philosophy of life. In life groups, it is inevitable to make mistakes, stumble, and even quarrel and conflict with others, but often one party will be patient first and the other will be angry. Like lightning and thunder, the moon is clear and the wind is clear in an instant. This magical effect is really due to modesty. The widely circulated story of "making love in the forest" in Historical Records is an example. (3) Lin Xiangru, the eunuch leader, was born in a humble position, but because of his "One Piece belongs to Zhao" and "Mianchi Club", he safeguarded Zhao and Zhao's dignity and made great contributions to Zhao. He was first worshipped as a doctor and then promoted to Shangqing. Although "in the same column" as General Lian Po, it is "on the right side of Lian Po". This made General Lian, who was born in a famous family and had a prominent position, rather unwilling. He not only degraded his credit, but even insulted his personality. He said that Lin Xiangru was just a "vain" and "unknown bitch" and threatened that if I saw each other, I would be humiliated. And like facing general Lian, he is not surprised or afraid, and he is humble everywhere. In court, he said he was sick and "didn't want to compete with Lian Po". Even if he meets, he will "lead the car to avoid." Xiangru's humility was not understood by his disciples at first, so he didn't take Xiangru seriously, threatened to suspend his job, instigated Xiangru to fight with Lian Po, and gave him evil spirit. Lin Xiangru made a surprising remark: "I dare not add troops to Zhao, only I am here." "I was so anxious about it, and then I had personal hatred." Hearing this, Lian Po was moved by Lin Xiangru's self-effacing personality and broad mind, and went to the door to apologize, thus becoming a close friend and being passed down as a story for thousands of years. It is conceivable that if Lin Xiangru and Lian Po are exactly the same, or if they listen to the public's urging to fight it out, the consequences will be unimaginable: "Two tigers competing" will inevitably be "not born"; Didn't Zhao's building just turn over? Lin Xiangru endure, also let go. We said he was right and gave in well. This forbearance and concession "forbearance" shows Zhao's stable situation, while "concession" shows Zhao Fuqiang's national style, broad mind and loyalty. ⑤ This is the proof of "let people score three points, not low" in philosophy. From this point of view, the ancients said: "capacity is the biggest and capacity is the highest" is a famous saying. Answer: It belongs to the form of viewpoint plus argument plus conclusion, which gives people the impression that viewpoint and argument are twisted together, oil is oil, water is water, and it is very clear. Section b: interlocking, tight, thorough and impeccable. The six-step method of analytical reasoning ① Analysis and argumentation ② Transition Introduction ③ Overview of argumentation ④ Argumentation Analysis σ Transition Extension σ Deepening Argumentation The specific contents of the six-step method are as follows: ① Analysis and identification-lateral analysis of general argument and establishment of argument points; (2) transition introduction-the connection and transition between arguments; (3) an overview of the argument-the central content of the demonstration part; (4) argument analysis-revealing the significance of the argument and laying a foundation for analyzing and dissolving the argument; ⑤ Transitional extension-transition and cohesion between arguments; ⑥ Deepening argumentation-anaphora analysis and argumentation. When writing an argumentative essay, there are often problems, or the analysis is empty, or the essence of the argument is not grasped, which leads to irrelevant and rambling. The training of "six-step method" of analytical reasoning can make up for this deficiency. For example, the topic: Perseverance uses the "six-step method" of analytical reasoning to form two levels (the body part of an argumentative paper), plus several parts that lead to arguments and conclusions, making it a complete argumentative paper. The first step: analyze the argument-perseverance is a crutch to climb the peak of wisdom. Step 2: Transitional introduction-Many people have beautiful ideals and enthusiasm for fighting for them, but lack perseverance. At first, they cast nets every day, and soon they can work conveniently for three days fishing and two days drying nets. Finally, they simply threw the net into the dustbin, and the pearls at the bottom of the sea were just a dream. The third step: an overview of the argument-there is such a beautiful legend as land. A fairy lives in a quiet house, which is very rare for mortals. One day, the fairy heard a pleasant knock on the door and wanted to wait for a while before opening the door, but the knock on the door soon stopped. A few days later, someone knocked at the door again. The discouraged fairy was too lazy to open it, but the man kept knocking. The fairy was finally moved by him and opened the door for the first time. Step 4: Analyze the argument-in this touching story, the second knocker finally achieved his goal. What is he better than the first man? Perseverance, only perseverance! Without perseverance, success is illusory, and anticlimactic struggle is also futile. The fifth step: transition and extension-if human beings have no perseverance, we may still live in caves and live the life of primitive people. However, our society is developing rapidly after all. Step 6: Deepen the argument-people have built a monument of architecture with perseverance and sweat. As can be seen from the above examples, the "six-step method" of analytical reasoning is interlocking, rigorous, profound and impeccable, which constitutes a level of argumentation analysis. The six-step method of logical analysis and reasoning can find the law of middle school students' training argumentative writing. Repeated practice is of great help to the improvement of reasoning ability.