Some people say "willing" is right. You can only get it if you lose it first.
Some people say that "giving up" should actually be called "giving up". Only when you get it can you lose it.
Arguing endlessly.
I think: Do you want to give up before you get it, or do you want to give up first? I can't decide.
For a long time, I picked up the materials and a story came into view:
A child went to the orchard and saw grandpa clicking off some branches from the fruit tree on the ladder. He picked up a branch and said, "Grandpa, they are growing well. What a pity you cut them off! " Grandpa said, "Silly boy, cut them down so that the fruit trees can grow better!" " "
After reading it, I seem to have learned something from grandpa's words.
"Cut them down so that the fruit trees can grow better!" He should mean "willing". Only by giving up these branches that absorb a lot of nutrients and letting the trees fully absorb them can the fruit trees grow better.
Do you have to give up if you can't get it? But if you get it, will it become "giving up" again? If so, the cause and effect cycle, their story will continue endlessly.
At night, lying in bed, still thinking about this problem.
Whether to go or stay, the decision is still in people's hands, perhaps depending on an action, a sentence, or a moment's memory.
relieved
However, looking at this problem objectively again, I find that "giving up" and "getting" are just an opposite, a simple opposite, without any evil thoughts. They have no right to decide their own destiny, they can only obey the arrangement of the hand of fate. And this hand is the human mind. The difference between "giving up" and "getting" is only the difference between people's thoughts, just like a boat that has been suppressed. ...