When defending a legal paper, the defense teacher usually asks the following questions:

1. What is the reason for choosing this topic?

First of all, years of experience have enabled me to master more materials and examples that are consistent or contrary to the subject's point of view. This is more conducive to the research and thinking of this discipline, and it is more conducive to discovering, thinking and solving problems. Finally, it can be said that I chose this subject after in-depth communication with my tutor (which is very important)

2. What is the significance and purpose of this research?

Purpose-around the problem to be solved in the paper, that is, why to choose this topic to discuss and what to discuss.

Significance-it is important to show what contribution the topic of the paper has made to theoretical research or what help and guidance it has to practice.

After making clear the difference between the two parts, you can search the related fields of the topic, make clear what research results there are at present and what parts of your topic need to be supplemented and improved, so as to have a comprehensive judgment on the value of the topic.

3. How is the basic structure and framework of the full text designed?

Take the content of the article as an example to explain a few points first. The general content is the relationship between the parts. Paragraph a paves the way for paragraph b, paragraph c helps explain the problem, and paragraph d puts forward the solution. It can not only explain the logical relationship, but also show your familiarity with the paper.

Finally, it is a summary, similar to the following:

In a word, all the parts are logically interrelated and cooperate with each other, becoming an integral part of the whole, which has played a role in expanding the topic, making the structure of the paper more unified and complete, and better expressing the content of the paper.

4. What is the logical relationship between the parts of the full text?

Introduce the research background, put forward the research questions, and summarize the previous research achievements and shortcomings on this issue. In my own thesis, I will use xxxx theory and follow the following structure.

The main idea of the text is to discuss xxx first, then xxx. At the same time, based on my research interest, I paid attention to xxxxx.

Based on the above analysis, I finally come to the conclusion xxxxx-

5. Did you find different opinions in the process of studying this topic? How did you get to know these ideas step by step? How to deal with it?

Remember to answer this question "No different opinions are found"! ! ! ! !

First of all, we must affirm that there are many different viewpoints on this issue (here we need to summarize and elaborate various viewpoints, such as XXXXXX in the traditional concept and XXXXXX in the modern concept), and secondly, we must explain how we view these different viewpoints (remember, we can't completely deny or affirm a certain viewpoint, and each different viewpoint has put forward some viewpoints, no matter right or wrong, as long as it is not outrageous). Finally, the handling of different opinions, First, how to deal with it in thesis writing (what "opinions" do you use, that is, theory as the theoretical basis of research), and second, how to deal with it in study and research (you still can't completely affirm or deny an opinion, but take its essence and discard its dross! )

6. What problems are not involved in the research, but are closely related to the research?

No matter how many words there are in any article, it is impossible to study all the problems involved clearly. Therefore, you need to choose one or two questions that are closely related to the theme and give a concise overview (the overview is not long, so it must be concise).

7. Is there any problem that I haven't studied thoroughly and my thesis research is not thorough enough?

This question needs to be answered in combination with the actual situation of your own article (but be careful to separate it from question 6). This problem has been mentioned or explained in the paper, but it is not deep enough! This is because the assessment teacher wants to know whether you have a correct understanding of your research topic. )

8. In the process of writing, what is the main basis of argument?

This problem must be strictly distinguished from the problem 1, and it needs to be described in combination with the present situation, significance and purpose of the problem studied by the topic.

9. What is the innovation of this research?

The innovation of this subject should be reflected in the following points:

(1) research can reflect the characteristics of the times.

② There are new contents in the research.

③ The research of the subject has a new perspective.

④ New research methods are adopted, and different research methods will lead to different conclusions.

⑤ Collect information extensively, understand the research status of the subject, understand what problems the existing research has solved, what shortcomings still exist and how to improve them. On this basis, the focus of the topic is determined to avoid the blindness of topic selection.

The innovation of the research project should be clearly put forward in the research plan to show that your research is not simply a repetition of other people's research work and achievements, but a new creation, which is also the most prominent value or significance of your research project.

10. What are the shortcomings of this study?

The answer to this question can be combined with question 7, according to the following steps: first of all, XXXXX II, XXXXX (if you really don't know, you can combine it with other majors, such as accounting, so you must involve professional statistical knowledge. You can say, "Because of the lack of professional knowledge in statistics, the XXX part needs further study in the research process" and so on. Because the writing of any paper must involve other professional knowledge points, it is impossible to finish it alone! )