1. Paper quality: This is the most direct evaluation standard. It can evaluate the innovation, practicality and logic of the paper. If the paper puts forward a new theory or method, or makes an important improvement on the existing theory or method, then the quality of this paper is very high. In addition, if the research results of this paper can be applied to practice, then this paper is also very practical. Finally, if the research process of the paper is rigorous and the argument logic is clear, then the logic of this paper is also very good.
2. The influence of the paper: We can evaluate the influence of the paper by reading the data such as the number of citations and downloads of the paper. If the number of citations and downloads of the paper is high, then the influence of this paper is great.
3. Journals that publish papers: SCI top journals usually have high influence and strict evaluation standards. If master students can publish papers in these journals, it is an affirmation of their research ability.
4. authors rank of the paper: In multi-author essays, the first author is usually the person who contributes the most to the paper. Therefore, if the master students are the first authors of the thesis, their contribution to this research will be even greater.
5. Tutor's evaluation: Tutors usually have a deep understanding of graduate students' research ability and achievements. Their evaluation is also an important basis for evaluating the level of master's thesis published in the top journals of SCI.
Generally speaking, to evaluate the level of master's thesis published in the top journals of SCI, factors such as quality, influence, published journals, authors rank and the evaluation of tutors should be comprehensively considered.