In our daily study and work life, everyone has tried to write a paper. There are many types of papers, including academic papers, graduation papers, dissertations, scientific papers, achievement papers and so on. I believe many friends are very upset about writing papers. The following are my collected papers on the role of sociology in sports research for your reference, hoping to help friends in need.
The role of sociology in sports research 1 Paper Keywords: sociology; Sports research; function
Abstract: This paper expounds the position and present situation of sociology in sports research. Reveal the role of sports sociology in sports research. The purpose is to make scientific research on sports as a social and cultural phenomenon, and gradually summarize sports science into a complete scientific system, so that it can play a more active role in sports research.
People have different views on whether sports sociology exists as an independent discipline, but in any case. No one can deny that sports activities have been studied from the perspective of sociology. But a discipline must have its own methodology if it is to be recognized. And according to this inherent methodology, systematically accumulate unique knowledge. In this sense, sports sociology as a knowledge is still under study. Make sports sociology gain a place in the forest of science in the future. Must be summarized into a system. This paper aims to analyze the status and present situation of sports sociology in sports research.
1, the position of sports sociology in sports research
/kloc-sports science research in the second half of the 0/8th century is mainly based on the understanding of anatomy and physiology in the medical field, in order to rationalize the method of body movement and improve its effect. Later, especially after entering the 20th century, because of drawing lessons from the achievements of mental science and psychological science, the relationship between body and mind in sports was regarded as a problem, and a new research field was developed. However. It was in the second half of the 20th century that people used the method of social science to recognize sports as a social phenomenon and regarded sports sociology as a part of scientific inspection and analysis, thus establishing its due position in sports research. This new research field-sports sociology. Now, as a science, although it is still immature and lacks self-contained knowledge accumulation, people have understood it. From the point of view that sports is a social and cultural phenomenon. It is mainly a part of sports research that analyzes and inspects sports phenomena according to sociological theories and methods. It is true that setting the scope of scientific research as a social phenomenon has a great premise: this is what should be defined as an objective "movement". To this end, we must first clarify the obvious confusion of the concept of sports in China at present, so as to eliminate the cognitive prejudice hidden in it.
In our country, the examples contained in the word "sports" are extremely complicated and multifaceted. For example, as a national education system, even in public schools, there are differences between in-class sports and extracurricular sports; In the general society, as "mass sports", all kinds of sports and entertainment activities are carried out more widely. If further analysis is made, sports, as a human activity accompanying body movements, not only have their similarities, but also are the same for everyone. The physiological movement of the body is accompanied by the activity of sensory response. And has the psychological appearance of the activity to be performed. This kind of activity is not only in a certain social and cultural environment, but also an excellent social activity formed by the interaction between subject and object.
This made us realize. Today's sports have undeniable multi-layer structure in universality and formal concept. This is well known. First, the concept of sports was not standardized in the past. In this way, the personality and characteristics of sports phenomena themselves are forced to adapt to the requirements of practice and make their functions offset each other; Then, in the sports science research with this as the object, the assumptions of every field or viewpoint are used blindly, and the unconstructive arguments are repeated constantly. Moreover, because the concept of sports contains many meanings in essence, almost all the existing sciences are involved in the analysis of sports phenomena, and all kinds of knowledge are accumulated in a decentralized way according to their respective theories and methods. Especially in China, although "sports" has existed for a long time as a comprehensive knowledge, its research fields include not only the scientific analysis of the body itself, the motivation of sports, the changes in the growth and development process caused by sports, but also the human potential, the value of sports as a kind of existence in society and culture, and so on, and the research scope has an infinite expansion trend. However, at least at present, all the sciences in the name of "sports" have not formed a clear organic connection. It can be considered that the systematic work as an independent discipline has not been actively carried out.
From this point of view, the reasons for the formation of "physical education" as a discipline system are not sufficient, and the general issues such as research scope and methodology have not yet reached the point of establishment. More importantly, it is both the research object and the research purpose of sports concept. In our country, the concept of sports is generally combined with the concept of education. Undeniably, it is limited to sports activities with certain educational purposes. Even today, the extended research of sports science is actually summarized into a system in the existing educational field. However, it is difficult to directly summarize all aspects of sports research into a learning system according to the scientific requirements that tend to carefully analyze facts and discover their laws. This is because sports phenomena can not only be analyzed as worthless body movements, but also people who act according to different purposes are bound to be restricted by their historical and social conditions, thus gaining certain cultural values.
For example, from a worthless point of view, physical exercise can improve physical strength, which is just a series of changes. However, if it is evaluated by certain standards, there must be a view of opening up a new direction of progress in sports. Therefore, if sports research comprehensively seeks the role of sports in human life, it will certainly increase some evaluations. Regarding the purpose of physical education, some scholars once said that "the purpose of physical education is somewhat different from the situation that' number' itself is learning in mathematics, because' physical education' itself does not mean learning, and only' physical education' is learning". This means that in sports research. Even in the name of science, we can't completely get rid of the relationship with education in sports and the formation of such a basic value concept. It shows that at least at present, there are considerable differences between sports research and body movement not only in the research angle and method, but also in the research object and scope. It is extremely difficult to completely unify them in sports or kinematics as an interdisciplinary science.
At present, the research on physical education is almost based on the existing related disciplines. And there is a tendency, that is, in order to make the phenomenon concrete, all fields are obviously based on pure scientific analysis methods. But ... as mentioned above, sports essentially contains the concept of value, in order to make sports possible. From the standpoint of human science, it is necessary to sort out and systematize the research results of individual disciplines related to sports selectively. Besides. Physical education should not only exist as "learning", but also contribute to the rationalization of sports practice. Give it a new direction. Therefore, in this case, physical education is not only effective in fully acquiring knowledge that adapts to reality, but also should undertake the task of summarizing its concepts and looking forward to new directions. It goes without saying that the value of sports is important. The author thinks that no matter today or in the future, we should not just regard sports as a pure science and be immune to it, but should establish its position in practical science and realistic science and redefine its research scope on this basis. In order to make physical education an independent science, it is necessary to bridge the gap between natural science and spiritual science. It is not human beings themselves who accomplish this task, but human education. This emphasizes the position of sports in the forest of humanities, and also emphasizes that sports must communicate with educational science in order to become an independent science.
2. Present situation and topics of sports sociology.
As a science, there are usually several frequently repeated propositions, the most important of which is how to adapt to the needs of the real society. Especially considering that all sciences are intertwined with social and practical problems, they have a profound relationship and become more and more practical, and sports sociology is no exception. As a realistic science, sports sociology is actively adapting to the needs of society and is in a difficult position to seek a specific point of view as a science. However, we must seek to make it independent as knowledge. Based on this understanding, and according to the viewpoint of methodology, we can have a general summary:
The term "sociology of sports" is used in consideration of "sorting out the research results of sports from sociology in the future and systematizing these results". However, it is understandable to admit that sports activities are a special social phenomenon and analyze them with sociological theories and methods, so as to regard them as a field of empirical science.
"Sports Sociology" is to study the reality and problems of sports from the perspective of sociology and try to make it more rational knowledge. In this way, he put the research viewpoint of sports sociology into the basic research field of sports science.
Sports sociology is a knowledge of "studying sports society from social science", and its research has two branches: one is to study social phenomena existing in sports from the perspective of social group science; Then, from the perspective of social culture, study the sports phenomenon existing in society. From the definition of the characteristics of sports sociology, sports sociology is the basic science of sports science and an independent science with its own system. It should be said that sports sociology is of great significance as the position that knowledge should occupy. In other words, sports sociology is not only the applied science of sociology, but also helpful to sports research; Moreover, sports sociology is a special sociology with personality, which regards the situation of human movement in the field of basic cultural education as a social phenomenon.
In a word, although the study of sociology of sports is particularly beneficial to the development of sociology of education in educational science at first, it obviously has its distinctive characteristics as an independent science in every study. But in our country, people often don't pay attention to this point, and some people almost regard sports sociology and sports sociology as synonyms. Although many previous studies advertised "sports sociology", in fact, their attention and energy were concentrated on sports sociology. Of course, as a research direction, this is of certain significance. However, the current research often only sees the interdependence between "sports" and "sports" and vaguely equates their completely different characteristics in concept, or adopts a pragmatic attitude and a bystander attitude towards "improving the rationality of sports". These are the important reasons why sports sociology still can't get rid of ambiguity completely.
In fact, sociology is a knowledge that pays attention to the common life of human beings and analyzes social phenomena. In this case, the focus of traditional general sociology methodology is to understand and analyze the phenomenon of * * * produced by special groups or society. However, in order to adapt sports sociology to its special objective content, if we look at its position in K. Mannheim's so-called "hyphenated sociology" system, the focus of its analysis is not so much the general laws of groups and society as the sports activities themselves in social reality. However, in the past, there was almost no effort to clarify that the focus of sports sociology analysis was sports activities themselves, which clearly showed that in the literature or papers of sports sociology, no matter at home or abroad, there was almost no clear stipulation that "sports" was both the research object and its research purpose.
Of course, if the facts are only shown in form, then there is no need to put forward a general concept restriction on sports scientific research, but if sports are regarded as having great value or purposeful tendency, there must be some basic concepts to limit it to be a fact. That is, "sports is a part of the social education function that human beings, as social people, take themselves as the main body and systematically select and realize the contents and forms of sports activities in a planned and reasonable way". This definition itself contains several important contents of sports as a social phenomenon. In my opinion, due to the above definition of sports, we have at least clarified the following issues to some extent. This is that sports sociology not only studies sports as a physiological and biological phenomenon, but also studies it as a social and cultural phenomenon. Besides discussing the reasonable value in line with the purpose of sports, it also analyzes the structural and functional characteristics of the society in which sports are located. From this perspective, it tends to social science and educational science.
3. Conclusion
Although sports sociology has its own inherent methodology after years of research, basically speaking, it consists of two parts: one is object theory, and the other is narrow methodology. In the past, sports research was mainly promoted on the premise of comprehensive science. In order to form a scientific physical education system, how related disciplines with different knowledge levels cooperate and penetrate each other is the key to success or failure. Therefore, in this case, sports research has two sides. On the one hand, it takes philosophy, history, psychology, sociology, physiology, physics and other major related sciences as the center, and resolutely regards sports science as a comprehensive science. Absorb the achievements of various disciplines; On the other hand, from different scientific viewpoints, we put sports research in a certain position and provide results for the development of sports research.
In a word, physical education is actually still in the brewing stage, at the intersection of branches of various disciplines, and its due position of knowledge is still very unstable. Nevertheless, there is a growing demand for sports sociology. Only by continuous research can we open up a new road in promoting the independent discipline system of sports sociology. Therefore, in order to meet the needs of the society and have its own independent point of view in sports research, sports sociology should not only explain the sports society from a static point of view, but also from a dynamic and dynamic aspect. Therefore, sociology can play a more active role in sports research on the basis of clarifying the relativity of each subject system.
The role of sociology in sports research 2 Abstract
Since the 1980s, sports scholars began to study the sociology of sports, the sociology of sports in China has gone through nearly 30 years. This paper analyzes and discusses the present situation of foreign sports sociology research, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures on how to develop sports sociology in the future; This paper reviews the development process of sports sociology in China, clarifies the development context of this discipline, summarizes the experience, and looks forward to the development ideas of sports sociology in China on this basis.
paper keywords
Sociology of sports; Research; Development; think
First, the historical review and present situation of the research on the development of sports sociology in China.
1. The research of sports sociology in China started late, and it was not until 1980s that it began to set foot in this field. The first lecture is "Sociology of Sports" written by Mr. Lin of Peking University, which introduces the framework of sociology of sports to the domestic sports theory circle on a small scale. 65438-0986 Shenyang Institute of Physical Education established the XX teaching and research section of China Sports Sociology. In 1980s, the status and influence of sports sociology in China were relatively small. From 65438 to 0994, China established the Professional Committee of Sports Sociology of China Academy of Social Sciences.
2. The academic team of sports sociology has a growing trend. In any discipline, the echelon of academic talents is an effective human resource for the development of this discipline. The enlightenment of sports sociology in China was initiated by scholars such as Lin, Cai, Niu Xinghua. Subsequently, Beijing Institute of Physical Education took the lead in recruiting postgraduates majoring in sports theory, marking the beginning of the training stage of high-level talents in sports sociology in China. 200 1 Beijing sport university began to recruit doctors in sports sociology. A large part of these high-level talents have become academic leaders of various institutions or units.
3. The research field of sports sociology is gradually expanding. In the 1980s, China's sports sociology mainly introduced and translated foreign materials, and at the same time, it had the dual characteristics of learning from foreign sports sociology research methods to study domestic sports phenomena. In the 1990s, the research fields have included sports values, sports industry and social problems in the field of sports. From the introduction and translation of foreign sports sociology materials, to the empirical preliminary study of sports sociology in China, and then to the current sports sociology with China characteristics, its research field has gradually widened and developed in depth.
4. The current development of sports sociology is characterized by the combination of qualitative and quantitative. Because the research of sports sociology in China started late, it mainly focuses on learning from foreign countries and is in the primary stage of development. Many contents of this subject are still lacking, so the initial academic development mainly depends on qualitative description. Great changes have taken place in the sports pattern in China since 1980s. Competitive sports and social sports have risen rapidly and entered the society at a faster speed. Therefore, some teachers and sports administrators who used to teach sports theory turned to sports and founded sports sociology in China. With the strengthening and development of sports socialization in China, it seems a bit insufficient to study the discipline system and academic research only by qualitative research. Therefore, most researchers of sports sociology began to engage in quantitative research of sports sociology on the basis of discipline theory construction. With the continuous development of sports in 1990s, social investigation has been widely used in various research fields of sports sociology, and has become an important method to collect sports social information. The consciousness of establishing social investigation network has formed questionnaire survey, which is the main form of social investigation. In recent 10 years, the application of questionnaire survey has made the research of sports sociology move from qualitative to quantitative, from speculative to empirical. "
Second, the development of sports sociology in China.
1. The discipline of sports sociology has a trend from differentiation to integration. Social science includes sports sociology. University disciplines with many series of branches, such as sports economics, sports policies and regulations, sports demography, sports industry and sports sociology, will gradually change to a holistic and comprehensive direction after a certain stage of differentiation and development. Some major frontier topics will attract many disciplines to gather and form new disciplines. The integration of social sports and its related disciplines has been further strengthened. Interdisciplinary research of sports sociology is very common. With the support of new research angles and methods, the internal branches of social sports will have an integrated trend.
2. The discipline construction of sports sociology should attach importance to localization. Localization mainly refers to the development of disciplines in line with national conditions. Localization is an important trend in the future development of sports sociology, especially for developing countries. Because China's traditional sports have a long history and are deeply loved by the broad masses of the people, it is of great historical significance not only to enrich the world sports culture, but also to inherit and develop China's traditional sports so as not to be overwhelmed and eliminated by western competitive sports.
3. Modern society presents the development trend of globalization, networking and knowledge. Interdisciplinary research of sports sociology is very common. China's sports sociology rose in the early 1980s, which overlapped with the contents of sports sociology, such as introduction to sports, sports management, sports economics, sports law, sports ethics, sports philosophy, sports aesthetics and comparative sports. Therefore, when sports sociology was formed, the boundaries of disciplines were very vague. Since 1990s, it has crossed with sports management, sports philosophy, sports culturology and other disciplines very frequently. Especially, it is a major feature of this paper to discuss the sports social phenomenon in China by combining sports economics. In addition, some scholars who used to study other fields turned to study sports sociology, often with traces of the original discipline, and the phenomenon of interdisciplinary research is also very prominent. This is also the reason why there is a fuzzy boundary in the research of sports sociology. The collective research and horizontal combination of various disciplines will become a remarkable feature of future sports sociology research. The internal branches of social sports will be integrated with the support of new research angles and methods.
4. From the current situation, there is still a lot of room for development in the research of sports sociology in China, and the detailed research of various disciplines of sports sociology, such as sports economics, sports politics, sports industry, sports policy and sports law, needs to be further strengthened. At present, great progress has been made in the detailed study of various branches of sports sociology, but because each branch has not developed into its own mature discipline, it is not enough to make use of the advantages of each branch to enrich and develop its own discipline. In addition, it is necessary to attract people from various humanities comprehensive disciplines to participate in the study of major social sports issues, and further attach importance to and strengthen the effective study of major issues in sports sociology in combination with China's political, economic and cultural factors. Research on the popularization of sports fitness knowledge and health knowledge, research on the sustainable development of sports industry directly related to China's economy, research on the popularization and promotion of Olympic spirit and culture, research on the excavation, inheritance and promotion of national traditional sports culture, transnational comparative research and cooperation research on social sports in various countries around the world, etc.
The role of sociology in sports research 3 Abstract: The development of social economy has promoted the deepening of contemporary education reform. In the new era of popularization of higher education, modern education has been paid more and more attention. As an important part of the higher education system, the discipline of sports humanities and sociology has gained a good development space in the era of quality education, but there are still some problems restricting its development. Therefore, relevant researchers should strengthen the reflection on the development of sports humanities sociology in China and put forward corresponding development strategies to further promote the scientific development of sports humanities sociology.
Keywords: reflective development strategy of sports humanistic sociology
On 1997, China's Ministry of Education set the discipline of sports humanities and sociology as an independent education discipline, which further consolidated its position. In the reform and construction of the socialist cause, the discipline of sports humanities and sociology gradually matured. However, the reform is not achieved overnight, and there are still some problems in the development and construction of sports humanities and sociology, which are worthy of reflection by relevant researchers. Therefore, relevant researchers should be based on the future development of sports humanities and sociology, and constantly integrate into the new era connotation.
First, the development of sports humanistic sociology in China.
(A) the boundaries of disciplines are blurred
The subject boundary of sports humanities and sociology is fuzzy, and it is difficult to provide systematic and professional subject boundary for relevant personnel in the process of grading and branching. With the continuous expansion of related research fields in China, the research field of sports humanistic sociology is also growing. This subject focuses on people and covers a wide range, with direct or indirect overlap. Taking physical education and training and traditional national sports as examples, their educational activities are easily confused with sports humanistic sociology, which leads to limited development space of the two disciplines to some extent.
(B) the lack of discipline theory construction
There is a problem of insufficient theoretical construction in sports humanistic sociology in China. In the early days of the establishment of the discipline of sports humanities and sociology, the discipline was based on humanities and social sciences, and its research methods, theoretical connotations and related contents were developed one by one within the scope of the two. However, the discipline of sports humanistic sociology itself has not yet formed a special theoretical system, so it is difficult to provide systematic theoretical guidance for the discipline of sports humanistic sociology. The third-level disciplines under the discipline of sports humanities and sociology are all based on sports. Although there are obvious sports words, the integration of theoretical research is not satisfactory. Therefore, it has become an important task in the current discipline construction to conduct scientific research on subordinate graded disciplines on the basis of sports humanities and sociology.
(C) uneven development of disciplines
The development of sports humanities sociology in China is unbalanced. At present, there are dozens of branches of sports humanities sociology in China, mainly including sports philosophy, school sports pedagogy, social sports and so on. However, the branch of sports humanistic sociology in the two disciplines is particularly obvious, with a complex system and complex content, which makes it difficult to provide a more comprehensive and clear discipline system for relevant researchers. At the same time, due to the complex characteristics of the discipline system of sports humanities and sociology, the development of the discipline is also unbalanced, some disciplines are difficult to meet the practical needs of social practice, and the theoretical content is lack of innovation under the framework of sports disciplines, which further restricts the sustainable development of the discipline.
Second, the development strategy of sports humanistic sociology in China
(A clear discipline boundaries
Clarifying the discipline boundary should be the development strategy of sports humanities sociology in China, so as to realize the long-term development of sports humanities sociology in China and provide an important discipline framework for the stable development of China's higher education system. Relevant researchers should systematically study the branches of sports humanities and sociology on the basis of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis, and divide the corresponding standards according to the different objects served by different disciplines, so as to avoid the uncertainty of discipline boundaries caused by the broad research content. At the same time, relevant researchers should clarify the relationship between the first-level discipline and the second-level and third-level disciplines, combine the development of the current era, redraft the standards, scientifically draw up the subject name, and provide more perfect index content for the scientific construction of sports humanities and sociology.
(B) to strengthen the theoretical construction of disciplines
It is necessary to strengthen the construction of discipline theory as the development strategy of sports humanities sociology in China, and make an important theoretical basis for the future development of sports humanities sociology. Relevant researchers should scientifically plan the theoretical construction of sports humanistic sociology, set up special branches of sports humanistic sociology and organize and manage them effectively, scientifically allocate theoretical resources of various disciplines, optimize the theoretical structure of sports humanistic sociology, strengthen the organizational management function of branches, and encourage researchers from various disciplines to communicate systematically on the theoretical construction of disciplines. At the same time, researchers should effectively explore the theoretical construction, actively learn from foreign advanced theoretical achievements, take its essence, and constantly enrich and develop the theoretical connotation of sports humanistic sociology.
(C) balanced development of all disciplines
Ensuring the balanced development of disciplines is the development strategy of sports humanities sociology in China. The content of sports humanities sociology in China is complex and the system is lengthy. Therefore, relevant researchers should scientifically set up sports humanities and sociology, so as to provide a comprehensive and clear discipline system for relevant researchers. Research scholars should have keen insight, consider the long-term development of sports humanities and sociology, further enhance the application value of discipline construction, and maintain vitality under the wave of quality education.
To sum up, the rapid development of social economy and the deepening of quality education reform provide important opportunities and a good social environment for improving the quality of higher education in China. As an important teaching subject in China's higher education system, the discipline of sports humanities and sociology plays a positive role in improving teaching quality and promoting students' all-round development. We should strengthen the scientificity and application of sports humanities sociology from three aspects: discipline boundary, theoretical construction and balanced development.
References:
[1] Li Na. Reflection on the Development of Sports Humanities Sociology in China and Discussion on Strategies [J]. Electronic Production.2014, 18: 168.
[2] Lu Wei. Analysis on the development trend of sports humanistic sociology [J]. Contemporary sports science and technology. 20 15, 10: 77-78.
[3] Lv Zhigang. Reflections on the discipline construction of sports humanities and sociology [J]. Journal of Beijing Sport University. 20 15，05: 593-595。
;