"Interlacing like a mountain" means that every industry, field and specialty has its own particularity, technology, skills and methods different from other industries or fields, and there are differences among them. It is this difference that requires people to do a line of research, master a line, and strive to become experts; Only by experiencing different industries and positions and mastering more knowledge and skills in all aspects can you become a "generalist"; Only by fully understanding and respecting everyone's professional expertise and personality characteristics and making a good combination can we achieve complementary advantages and achieve1+1> 2. Achievements of excellent teams. Of course, facing up to "interlacing like a mountain" does not mean limiting yourself to "mountains". The correct attitude is to go to a higher "mountain" and understand the philosophy of "interlacing like a mountain" from a higher level.
"Interleaving without separation" means that although different industries and fields have their own characteristics, the basic ideas and methods of finding, analyzing and solving problems are the same, and there are the same rules to follow. From "interlacing like a mountain" to "interlacing like a mountain", it embodies the universal connection of things, which is not only a promotion and leap in understanding, but also the only way to expand ideas and creatively carry out work. It shows that people should be good at jumping out of their own profession, field and specialty, learning from others' experience, enriching themselves, broadening their horizons, broadening their thinking, getting rid of limitations, grasping regularity and realizing creativity. Practice tells us that the so-called "layman" and "expert" are only relative. A "layman" who is good at grasping and controlling the similarities of different industries and fields and understands "reason" will soon become an expert and can lead experts. Guo Shina, who is not proficient in computer technology, led IBM to create an unprecedented development miracle; An American swimming coach who can't swim has trained a world swimming champion, which fully illustrates this truth.
How can we open up a road of "never leaving" in the fog of "mountain"? First, we must firmly believe that interlacing is like a mountain, but it does not separate. We can neither cling to "interlacing like a mountain" nor use "interlacing like a mountain" as an excuse, and are unwilling to bother to understand and explore the knowledge of other industries and fields. We should constantly break the misunderstanding and bondage of ideological understanding and persist in climbing the "mountain" to find "reason". Second, we must find the right ways and means. The key to breaking "enough" and opening up different industries, fields and majors lies in grasping the word "enlightenment". As the saying goes, "everything is learned, and people's understanding is an article", and the difference between people depends largely on the level of understanding. For people with will, nature and society, humanities and technology, being a man and doing things are all the same. If you are good at mastering, you can achieve one thing and another. Everything in the world is interlinked, and the universal principle of a principle is universal. Of course, the so-called "enlightenment" is definitely not to think behind closed doors. Whether it can be realized is based on profound knowledge accumulation and rich practical experience.
Therefore, in our work, we should not only admit the objectivity of "interlacing is like a mountain", but also firmly believe in the truth of "interlacing is like a mountain". As long as we dare to challenge, constantly surpass, improve our quality and increase our talents, we will certainly break new ground and achieve new results in all fields and posts.
2. Do you have to give examples when writing an article? Some netizens said that my article lacked examples and even thought it was a serious problem. I wonder if they are still writing argumentative papers for the exam, and they should pay attention to arguments and things like that.
I think, if you don't have to accept dogmatic comments, you just have to write according to the logic of the article, so you don't have to worry about those boring and smelly rules. For a well-founded article, argument is much more important than proportion.
If the ideas are novel and the arguments are in place, even if there are no examples, it is still a good article. Just because an article has no examples doesn't mean that it can't find suitable examples. Maybe it's just that there are too many examples, too common.
If a specific example is put forward, it will damage the universality of argument; If you add a few more complete supplements, it will make the article appear lengthy. Generally speaking, only when you find inspiring examples will you consider giving such examples, otherwise you can only add more words.
In addition, please note that for a higher point of view, the low-level argument itself can be regarded as an example, or it may be called an abstract example. Some netizens said that my article lacked examples, which may only be confined to the level of concrete common sense, while ignoring the abstract examples here.
My articles are generally tall. If we want to trace back to specific common sense, the front will be longer, the article will be unnecessarily wordy, and even there will be faults. For such a high-viewpoint article, it is naturally best to find vivid and typical examples, but we should not ask too much of them. After all, most of them are only individual cases, and more abstract examples are needed.
Dogmatists ask middle school students to give simple examples, probably because they don't need to write articles with high opinions. Dogmatists ask middle school students to give examples, which can not only explain things vividly, but also be objective, and will not make arguments become pure sophistry.
I will not talk about the realistic servility of this view here, but point out that such objectivity is only an illusion. In fact, the examples cited in writing articles are all beneficial to their own arguments, and they always unconsciously ignore those counterexamples, resulting in the illusion that everything is like this.
For example, when we talk about the harm of internet addiction, we always say that some students delay their studies because they are addicted to the internet, but they ignore the ideological enlightenment of the internet to others. For those students who are addicted to the internet, the deeper reason may be their disappointment with our education and society. It can be seen that examples can not only explain the problem, but also cover it up.
Examples are not necessary for authors, especially those who can put forward high opinions, but our readers can test their understanding by trying to give appropriate examples. Interested readers may wish to have a look. How many examples have I given in this article, and how many are so-called abstract examples? The composition of the college entrance examination is really harmful. Please read the blog post: How does the composition of the college entrance examination become a draft activity?
3. Write a composition with examples ~ Help ~ Heliocentrism of Copernicus. From 65438 to 0499, Copernicus graduated from the University of Bologna in Italy and became a Catholic priest. He returned to Poland to work with his uncle. His uncle Vasilo became the bishop of Franburg Catholic Cathedral. Copernicus lived on the top floor of the church, so he could make long-term astronomical observations. At that time, people believed in the cosmological model founded by Ptolemy, a Greek scientist, more than 500 years ago. Ptolemy believed that the earth was the center of the universe and stood still. The sun, the moon, planets and stars all revolve around the earth, while the stars are far away from the earth and outside the huge space sphere. However, after careful observation, scientists found that the laws of planetary motion were inconsistent with Ptolemy's model of the universe. Some scientists revised Ptolemy's theory of cosmic orbit and added more celestial orbits to the original orbit (or small celestial orbit). This model says that each planet moves in a circle along a small orbit, and the small orbit moves in a circle around the earth along the big orbit of the planet. Hundreds of years later, the loopholes in this model became more and more obvious. Scientists have added many orbits to this model, so the planets move in circles along one orbit after another. Copernicus wanted to use "modern" (16th century) technology to improve Ptolemy's measurement results in order to cancel some small orbits. For nearly 20 years, Copernicus tirelessly measured the positions of the planets day and night, but the results obtained by his measurement were still not much different from Ptolemy's celestial operation mode. Copernicus wanted to know what it would be like to observe the movements of these planets on another running planet. Based on this assumption, Copernicus put forward an idea: if the earth is moving, what will these planets look like? The idea became clear in his mind. In a year's time, Copernicus observed planets from the earth at different times and at different distances, and the situation of each planet was different. This is because he realized that the earth can't be in the center of the orbit of a star. After 20 years of observation, Copernicus found that only the annual change of the sun was not obvious. This means that the distance between the earth and the sun has never changed. If the earth is not the center of the universe, then the center of the universe is the sun. He immediately thought that if the sun is placed in the center of the universe, then the earth should revolve around the sun. In this way, he can cancel all the small circular orbit modes and let all the known planets revolve directly around the sun. However, can people accept Copernicus's new model of the universe? Do people all over the world, especially the powerful Catholic Church, believe that the sun is the center of the universe? For fear of being punished by the church, Copernicus did not dare to make his discovery public when he was alive. It was not until 1543 that this discovery was made public. Even at that time, Copernicus's discovery was constantly despised and ridiculed by churches, universities and other institutions and astronomers. Finally, 60 years later, Johannes Kepler and Galileo Galilei proved that Copernicus was right. As early as 3000 years ago, China recorded Heliocentrism in the Book of Changes.
Some scholars believe that the sun is the master of the earth, and the earth should obey the sun and revolve around it. This is based on Japanese, which is essentially Heliocentrism. But it didn't get much recognition.
4. How to write a topic composition, can you give an example? Topic composition is also called expository writing, which is a rational article and describes a topic. It is best to choose two examples, which can be a comparison between China and foreign countries or a comparison between ancient and modern times. Step by step is more convincing. For example, you can read the texts "Learning and Asking Questions", "Talking about Politeness" and "Learning Cooperation". If you want to write, you can start with the topics "_ _ the most important" and "learn _ _". The center should be clear, so that others can know what you want to express at a glance. If two examples are progressive, or one is positive and the other is negative.
Example:
In the14th and15th centuries when European capitalism was budding, there appeared a mode of production called package buyer, which distributed the means of production to a number of craftsmen and completed the production tasks through their cooperation. This may be the embryonic form of modern business cooperation.
Today, with the rapid changes in society, cooperation has been re-valued. It is not only a business operation mode, but also a spirit and an indispensable great force to promote social development.
Cooperation is everywhere. Even in nature, it is not difficult for people to find cooperation. In the small ant family, there is a complex but strict division of labor. Worker ants are responsible for exploring the road and finding food, while soldier ants shoulder the safety of the nest. The queen ants give birth to offspring, and some feed them. No more or less members, no contact at all. It is with the cooperative spirit of each member that the ant family can survive.
The production of Concorde, a world-famous aircraft, is accomplished through cooperation and division of labor. Every part of it, from the wing to a screw on the landing gear, is made by professional departments in different countries. Finally, assemble different parts, and a Concorde is counted as one day. Cooperation has truly integrated into every corner of the world.
Cooperation comes from trust. In fact, many international organizations and groups with cash are based on cooperation, and this cooperation is based on mutual trust between countries. Cooperation needs different individuals to complete together and needs tacit understanding. If individuals lack enough trust, there will be no tacit understanding and cooperation will not succeed. For example, in the rules of the World Trade Organization on regularly reporting the financial situation of signatory countries, if signatory countries falsely report or underreport relevant data in order to maintain their strength, then this distrust will inevitably lead to the failure of cooperation. So it is not difficult to see that cooperation without sincerity and trust is worthless.
Cooperation is power. If you eat upside down with only one chopstick, it can hardly hold a piece of meat, but with a pair of chopsticks, the result will be the opposite. It can be seen that only cooperation can exert the power that individuals do not have and have greater power than individuals. Just as Zhuge Liang commanded the Shu army to defeat Cao Bing, most of them were defeated by less. One of the important reasons is that Zhuge Liang clearly knows that only cooperation can have infinite power.
Cooperation is indeed a spirit, which originates from trust and is everywhere. More importantly, this spirit is immeasurable. This era calls for many spirits, and the spirit of cooperation will always be an inexhaustible motive force to push forward the times.