Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to treat scientific fraud
How to treat scientific fraud
Academic fraud refers to plagiarism, plagiarism, possession of other people's research results, or forgery or modification of research data. Academic fraud is first of all a violation of academic ethics and scientific spirit, and it is the product of impetuous and quick success in the academic field.

On August, 2065 438+08 10, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security solicited opinions from the society on the Regulations on the Administration of Professional Title Evaluation. The "Regulations" put forward that the evaluation of professional titles should be based on morality first, and academic fraud should be "rejected by one vote" and included in the "blacklist" of credit. [ 1]

On September 6, 2020, People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Ministry of Science and Technology reported the investigation results of nine cases of irregularities such as falsification of papers. [2]

Chinese name

Academic cheating

convention

Plagiarism, plagiarism and possession of other people's research results

attribute

Violate academic ethics and scientific spirit

Exposure comes from

In 2009

Appearing place

Almost all colleges and universities in China

quick

navigate by water/air

Partial events

counter-measure

administrative laws and regulations

Fake case

introduce policies

cause

In recent years, the phenomenon of fraud in colleges and universities in China is more serious. In the past 2009, academic scandals were frequently exposed, and academic corruption has spread to most academic fields. Yang Yusheng, a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, said that almost all universities in China have scholars suspected of academic fraud or corruption.

Professor Tang Anguo, an expert in higher education research and East China Normal University, pointed out that the academic environment is impetuous, some people lose their balance in the face of the temptation of fame and fortune, and some supervision systems are seriously lacking, which opens the door for them; In addition, in order to compete for rankings, it is generally difficult for schools to effectively audit scientific research projects and researchers.

Professor Xiong Bingqi, an expert on university issues, believes that the academic discipline of universities is not standardized or even standardized for a long time. On the one hand, for schools, dealing with academic misconduct may affect their image and their own political achievements; On the other hand, dealing with academic misconduct may involve many vested interests, including applying for projects and striving for funds; In addition, the school learned that many teachers' misconduct was actually forced by various unreasonable quantitative indicators, including funding indicators, project indicators, thesis indicators, patent indicators, etc., which led to impetuousness and quick success. "Academic anomie in colleges and universities has its own moral reasons, but it is more due to the current academic system." Xiong Bingqi believes that it is more important to establish a system to reduce and prevent anomie in the whole education system.

Fang, a well-known academic counterfeiter, said that academic misconduct of academic fraud in other countries is often confined to academic circles, but corruption in China's academic field is closely combined with corruption in other fields, especially in the political and economic fields. On the one hand, the official-oriented system makes scientific research and education institutions become a part of the officialdom, and scientific research posts and titles have certain administrative levels, such as the director of the department is at the department level, the president is at the bureau level, and the academician is at the deputy ministerial level. As a scholar, it is actually a "scholar". Therefore, official corruption will inevitably lead to academic corruption and will inevitably cover up academic corruption.

On the issue of academic fraud, it is not an exaggeration to say that some university leaders are too stupid to tell right from wrong. On March 22nd, 2065438+00, An Evening News reported that a school leader met with six professors who participated in reporting Li Liansheng. As soon as they met, they said, "Now colleges and universities are practicing collusion, so don't make a fuss. Your report made the school leaders restless day and night for 50 days, and you were the initiator. I now declare that if the six of you are willing to quit, it is not too late. If you are for the benefit, we can convey it to Li Liansheng and let them give you some first prizes from the Ministry of Education. " When I met with six professors for the second time, "another school leader told them to stop online exposure, saying that the harm caused by online and newspapers was immeasurable, and I hope I will not go to society again." This passage is the best portrayal of the "fake insurance mentality" of some university leaders.