Setting an example is the most important thing. How can I say that? This has always been my idea since I was a child. In my opinion, as a leader, always set an example, play a leading role and make a good start, so as to lead people to the right path and arouse the enthusiasm of subordinates and the masses, otherwise, it will only be counterproductive. That's what fish begins to stink at the head said. I want to ask, if a leader is corrupt, how can his subordinates not follow suit? Therefore, I said, the most important thing is to set an example and do a good job of "integrity".

Today, I have clearly realized the importance of setting an example. Why do you say that? This is my experience of participating in the Youth League training today, and it is also the most important and profound experience of this training. Today, my classmates and I participated in group training. During the whole meeting, I watched and listened attentively, and I didn't miss any place, even the smallest place. This meeting is called Youth League Training. As the name implies, it is a meeting to train how to be a good group cadre. Of course, those who can attend are all cadres of the League, and I am one of them. At the meeting, I talked about what qualities and styles a person should have.

Ability, should have fully flexible social skills, excellent ability to do things, which is an essential quality of a group, that is, the foundation of high-rise buildings. The foundation of a high-rise building is unstable, even if it is as high as it is, it is just an empty box, which is vulnerable. However, the work of the Youth League is like a building with insufficient capacity and dangerous status. It will have no prestige and there is no reason for subordinates to be willing to work. Style, style should be decent, you can't do things that violate the law and discipline, and you must have noble qualities to convince people. Setting an example is the most important thing in style. Without him, nothing can be done, either success or inefficiency.

There's a reason for that. If you just tell people what to do and order them once or twice, that's ok. Subordinates may be afraid of your rights, but they don't want to put up with it. Many times, they will get angry and they will definitely quit. At that time, you see, it was too late to regret it. At this time, the matter is left to yourself, so you should be angry yourself. Maybe I exaggerated the facts. You might say, it's not so exaggerated. Leaders are always directing their subordinates, but they do nothing. If you think so, it's all wet. Yes, the leader has the command power, but sometimes, it is not feasible for him to lead by example and lead by example. It will only lead to distrust and loss of prestige. You may say that I exaggerate. How can a regimental cadre say the same thing as a government official? Actually, it is not. If you run a big country, the league cadres are small, but they are also an official position. Just like being an official. They have their own burdens and responsibilities. Can we not lead by example? I can't.

As a group cadre and official, we should set an example. This is my idea. The most important thing is to set an example.