1. Title and abstract of the paper: The reviewer should evaluate the title and abstract of the paper to see if it is concise and can accurately reflect the theme and research content of the paper.
2. Introduction: Reviewers should pay attention to whether the introduction clearly expounds the research background, purpose, significance and related research overview. In addition, it is also necessary to check whether the references are appropriate and whether important references are omitted.
3. Research methods: Reviewers should evaluate the research methods to see whether they are scientific, reasonable and feasible, and whether they have sufficient theoretical basis. At the same time, we should also pay attention to whether there are problems in experimental design, data collection and analysis.
4. Results and discussion: Reviewers should pay attention to whether the research results are clear and accurate and whether the discussion is thorough. In addition, you should also check whether the chart is clear and standardized and whether the data is reliable.
5. Conclusion: The reviewer should evaluate the conclusion of the paper to see whether it is clear and reasonable and whether it can answer the research questions. At the same time, we should also pay attention to whether the conclusion is too wide or too narrow.
6. Structure and format of the paper: the reviewer should pay attention to whether the structure of the paper is reasonable and whether the connection of various parts is natural. In addition, you should also check whether the format of the paper meets the requirements of the journal, such as font, font size, line spacing, margins and so on.
7. Language expression: The reviewer should evaluate the language expression of the paper to see whether it is fluent and concise, and whether there are grammatical errors and spelling errors.
8. Academic contribution and innovation: reviewers should pay attention to the academic contribution and innovation of the paper to see if it has certain theoretical value and practical significance.
9. Suggestions for revision: The reviewer should give specific suggestions for revision according to the specific conditions of the paper to help the author improve the quality of the paper.