(1) Refutation point. Among arguments, arguments and arguments, the error of arguments is the key, and arguments and arguments serve the wrong arguments. Refuting wrong arguments is the main refuting method in writing refuting papers.

(2) rebuttal. Wrong arguments are always supported by untenable or absurd theories and wrong examples. As long as these arguments are overturned and refuted, they will lose their support and be self-defeating.

(3) refute the argument. Wrong arguments not only rely on absurd and untrue arguments, but also often use wrong arguments and reasoning between them to sophistry. Refuting arguments is to expose the unreasonable connection between wrong arguments and arguments, and point out the confusion and absurdity of their logical relationship.

Discussion method has three elements: argument, argument and argument.

Argument is the author's views and opinions on the object of discussion. Specifically, the author proves his point of view and refutes the other side's point of view for an event and problem; Express an attitude of affirmation, negation, praise and opposition. Argumentation is the soul of argumentative writing.

(1) The argument must be correct, that is to say, it must conform to the objective reality and be able to solve practical problems.

(2) Argumentative paper has only one argument. Some argumentative papers are complex, and there can be several arguments, but only one is the central argument, that is, the general argument, and the other arguments are in a subordinate position, which is generally called the sub-argument. Sub-argument discusses the general argument from several different aspects. As an argument, the viewpoint must be novel and original.

(3) The argument should be a clear judgment, a complete statement of the author's point of view, and a complete sentence in form. Can be in the title, beginning, end, middle, etc. of the article.

Argument is used to prove the basis of an argument, and in logic, it is a judgment to determine the authenticity of a topic. In the proof, it is responsible for answering "why". Argumentation is divided into factual argument and logical argument.

(1) The factual argument is a true description and generalization of objective things, which has a direct and realistic character, so it is the most convincing argument to prove the argument. The so-called "facts speak louder than words" is the truth. The contents of factual arguments include examples, historical facts, data, etc. Facts and arguments should be true and representative.

(2) Logical arguments refer to those viewpoints that come from practice and have been proved and tested by long-term practice and come to the correct conclusion. It includes the basic principles of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, the Party's line, principles and policies, scientific definitions, rules and laws of different periods, general axioms, common sense, idioms, proverbs and so on.