The structure of the argument is: point (left and right structure) (upper and lower structure).

The structure of the argument is: point (left and right structure) (upper and lower structure). The part of speech is: noun. The pinyin is: Randy n. The phonetic notation is: ㄨㄣㄉㄢˇ.

What is the specific explanation of the argument? We will introduce you through the following aspects:

I. Text Description Click here to view the details of the plan.

Argument lü ndi m: n. (1) Deterministic views in the discussion and the reasons for supporting them.

Second, the citation interpretation

Views or opinions expressed by the author. Quote Liang Qichao's Answer to a Newspaper's No.4 Refutation about Xinmin Congbao: "However, if you think he dares to argue, you can defeat the important argument of this newspaper." Wang Xiyan's Men's World: The Third Neighbor: "Although the tone is humorous, the argument is incisive."

Third, the national language dictionary.

Argument point of view. For example, "the arguments in this paper are different, and the controversial points are unheard of." 」

Fourthly, online interpretation.

Argument argument, also called judgment, is the author's point of view. Logically, argument is a judgment whose truth needs to be confirmed. It is the author's views, opinions and attitudes on the issues discussed. It is the center of the whole argumentation process, shouldering the task of answering "what to demonstrate" and clearly indicating what the author is in favor of and against. It is a statement with clear meaning.

A poem about an argument

The remaining parameters are also compiled.

Words about controversy

dubiusargumentthesiscontentionbattlefieldargumentparadoxmakeapointdiscuspoint

Idioms about arguments

Turn stone into gold, a nodding acquaintance; On thousands of points, finger painting and circle.

Words about controversy

What to do, turn stone into gold, even red dots and green dots, finger painting, writing without dots, easy to nod.

Sentence-making about arguments

The dissident speaker knocked Mr. Brown's argument to pieces.

Your speech is self-contradictory, and the latter argument just negates the former argument.

3. The absurdity of refuting wrong arguments layer by layer is obvious.

Your argument comes down in one continuous line with Professor Zhang Xiangru's theory.

His argumentative paper is full of loopholes and his argument is absurd.

Click here to see more details about this debate.