2. From the defense, it can be seen that this student has a solid professional foundation, is well prepared, is very familiar with the content of the paper, can concisely and clearly state the design ideas and processes, systematically display smoothly, answer questions well-founded, have clear basic concepts, and have some innovations in the paper. I hope to continue to improve some words and symbols in the paper and strive for standardized use.
3. The student explained the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and was able to answer the questions related to the paper properly, with a modest attitude and a solid computer foundation. It is suggested to use appropriate words to express the image opening function and standardize the paper format.
4. Combining mathematical knowledge and using computer technology to deal with geological problems, I have a thorough grasp of the methods and principles, and the paper is innovative. The results of fast Fourier transform and wavelet transform are analyzed in place, and the processing effect is good, and the computer basic literacy is good. The answers to the main questions in the defense are accurate and thorough. It would be better if there is a contrast between the converted indicators in this paper.
5. The paper is clearly stated and the explanation is simple and clear. However, the deficiency lies in the lack of new ideas and methods, mostly based on other people's research results, and the format of the paper should be standardized.
6. Fully prepared for defense, able to answer the teacher's questions in detail, able to repeatedly discuss the difficulties encountered in the research and design process, find better solutions, and have good professional skills. It would be better if the static web page can be made dynamic by combining professional improvement, but the deficiency is that the description of the table in the database is not quite right, and I hope it can be improved.
7. The paper is clearly stated, straight to the point and directly into the subject. I can answer the teacher's questions fluently and think clearly, but I can't correctly explain some codes in the paper and there are a few language errors. I hope there will be more innovations in future research.
8. The student can state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, but the answers to questions in the defense are not very smooth, unfamiliar with the design details, and the answers to questions are not relevant enough.
9. Elaborate the thesis from five parts, with outstanding key points, fluent and skilled defense, basic knowledge in place and time meeting the requirements. The disadvantage is that there are some conceptual mistakes in the article.
10. During the defense, the student can skillfully and concisely state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, with clear organization and obvious innovation, quick response when answering questions, accurate expression, skilled system demonstration and high professional quality. After deliberation by the defense Committee, it was unanimously agreed that his grades were excellent.
1 1. In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main content and structure of the paper, as well as the research conducted for it, which showed that he had a certain understanding of the problems studied. The video design is beautiful, but it doesn't meet the professional requirements. It will be better to design the implementation process from the perspective of computer science.
12. The student fluently stated the purpose, theoretical and practical significance of writing this paper. The design process of antique websites is standardized, but there is little connection between entities and concepts. The whole design should meet the requirements of the computer as much as possible.
13. The student expressed clearly and answered questions fluently. Although the paper has a good idea and certain research value, the framework and content are huge, which requires strong independent research ability, and the title of the paper and the client login server module need to be slightly modified.
14. The students are well prepared, the link sentences are complete, and the thesis is clearly conceived, which reflects a good professional foundation and a good grasp of time. That is, there is demand in the paper but there is a lack of demand analysis, and the answers to some defense questions are not clear, and the graphic representation is not standardized.
15. Students used dreamweave and access database technology to design Ganzi tourism website. The design is fresh and beautiful, the main questions are answered accurately, and the basic concepts are clear. I want to correct the database storage problem in the file.
16. The student has good professional quality, fluent answers and high accuracy. He has a good understanding of the problems encountered in the implementation process and a good grasp of time. It will be better if it can be implemented in a relatively new operating environment.
17. The student explained the design details of the database in detail, did in-depth research, and independently completed the forum design part, with certain scientific research ability, clear thinking in defense and concise and smooth answers. After careful discussion, the defense team agreed that the student's performance was good, but asked the student to correct some mistakes in the paper.