But this classmate Xiao Zhang questioned the teacher because he participated in the teacher's scientific research project. The reason is that he spent two months programming in the process of writing an SCI paper, which made him feel very difficult and hard. But the teacher only gave him the third author, and he felt very wronged and thought that his work was not respected.
However, I think that if you are not a sophomore, you can independently send high-level papers to talented college students; So for sophomore students, the teacher gives you the third author of SCI, which is very valuable!
Your work is not the core of the paper. An SCI research paper can be hired and published. Generally speaking, it takes a lot of energy and time to find ideas, prove by experiments that writing and submitting papers, and revise several steps of final employment. And each step requires a lot of energy and time, and there is a lot of work to be done.
Among them, the most difficult thing is to find a unique and innovative paper that can reflect technological progress or major breakthroughs through long-term and massive professional accumulation and knowledge input? Kernel? . This new method, new material or new technology is the most critical part of whether the paper can be hired, which is equivalent to the goal and direction of scientific research work and plays the role of raising the flag. Experiments, verification, writing and revision are all efforts to achieve this goal.
The programming work you have done is not the core part of the most hired paper, and of course it is not the person who contributes the most. The teacher will not lose money to the third author, because the contribution of the first and second authors will be far greater than yours.
What you have done is very difficult for a senior two student. You are only a sophomore, and I believe you are new to scientific research. Even after 1 1 year of study, your professional quality in scientific research is still in the primary stage, and your professional knowledge is not solid and your professional ability is not outstanding.
The programming part of the thesis is only difficult for you as a sophomore. Maybe it's just a very basic and ordinary task for junior and senior students or graduate students, and it can be completed in less than 2 months, which is not as important as your own work.
The reason why the teacher gave you this programming job is to train you, cultivate you and give you this precious opportunity for progress.
As a student, the learning process is more important than the result. I believe that you have suffered a lot, sacrificed a lot of rest time, and paid a lot of sweat and effort in the process of writing your thesis during the two-month programming time. At present, you only see your own efforts, but you didn't expect that in this process, in fact, your gains far exceeded your imagination.
You know how to write SCI papers. You have greatly improved your programming level in the process of analyzing and solving difficult problems, and also learned a lot of professional knowledge in the communication and discussion with teachers or brothers. These are all valuable assets for you to engage in professional scientific research in the future, and they are the cornerstone for your professional ability to take off.
Considering your hard work, the teacher gave you the third author. After all, having an SCI paper in the second year of high school is also a very proud thing, which proves your excellent ability. At this time, your works have been respected, and you shouldn't worry about these three works.
Conclusion Your research path is better than that of 99% peers. Few sophomores can publish SCI papers, which many graduate students can't do. Therefore, on the academic road, if you can start smoothly from a high starting point and do your own study in a down-to-earth manner, you will certainly achieve greater academic achievements in the future!