The basic requirements for writing medical papers are scientific, advanced and practical.
1, science.
The first condition of medical papers is that they must be scientific. The so-called scientificity refers to whether the methods and arguments introduced in the paper have been verified by scientific methods and can stand the test of practice.
This requires: careful consideration should be given to scientific research design to eliminate all unfavorable factors that may interfere with the results; It is necessary to establish a necessary control group or even a double-blind controlled study; The experimental and observed data should be statistically processed; No matter theoretical research or experimental research, the analysis of the results should start from the actual data and draw appropriate conclusions, and avoid empty talk and abstract reasoning.
2. Advanced nature (creativity).
The advanced nature of the paper actually refers to whether the paper has reached a certain scientific level. Although a paper is scientific, it is not necessarily advanced, because this work may have been confirmed by others several years ago or even more than ten years ago, so the advanced nature of medical papers.
It can be measured from two aspects: first, whether there is a new breakthrough in theory, such as principle discussion and treatment mechanism; The second is the level of practice, such as whether the diagnostic level or therapeutic effect is higher than the general level, and whether the technical operation is particularly advanced. However, whether it is to measure the level of practice or theory, it should be compared with the existing level of similar achievements at that time, such as the level of similar projects abroad, at home and at home.
3. Practicality (applicability).
One is a clinical-related topic, and the other is repeatability. Practicality means that the invention or utility model can be manufactured or used and can produce positive effects. However, it should be noted that countries have lower requirements for the creativity of utility models than inventions, and some countries do not even require utility models to be creative. In addition, the protection period of the utility model is short, and the examination procedure is relatively simple.
Invention and creation should be based on the use of natural laws to obtain technical solutions, and the judgment basis is not necessarily recognized natural laws. When judging whether an invention violates the laws of nature, it is not limited to the known laws of nature, but also includes the experience or knowledge accumulated by human beings in the process of exploring nature, and the patent law does not require the applicant to fully understand the causal relationship or scientific principles in these experiences or understandings.