In the field of scientific research, authors usually receive feedback and suggestions from reviewers after submitting articles to SCI journals. At this time, the author needs to revise the paper according to the opinions of the reviewers and reply the revised manuscript to the journal. The following are some templates for SCI journal replies:

1. Thank the reviewers for their comments: First of all, the author needs to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments. For example: "Thank you for your busy schedule to review our paper and give detailed suggestions for revision."

2. Explain the changes: Next, the author needs to briefly explain the changes in the paper. For example: "According to your suggestion, we have supplemented and improved the experimental part of the paper and re-analyzed the results."

3. Explain the reasons for the changes: For some important changes, the author needs to explain why such changes are made. For example, "we revised the introduction of the paper to explain the research background and purpose more clearly."

4. Provide evidence or data support: If the revision involves the adjustment of some viewpoints, the author needs to provide corresponding evidence or data to support these revisions. For example, "We provided new experimental data to prove our point of view is correct."

5. Ask whether to accept the revised manuscript: Finally, the author needs to ask the journal whether to accept the revised manuscript. For example, "Do you accept our revised manuscript? Please feel free to tell me if you have any questions. "

6. Express expectation: At the end of the letter, the author can express his expectation for the periodical to reply as soon as possible. For example, "We look forward to your reply and hope that our paper can be published in your journal as soon as possible."

7. Signature: At the end of the letter, the author needs to sign his name and company.

In short, the reply to the revision of SCI journals needs to express the response to the reviewers' opinions concisely and clearly, as well as the explanation of the revision of the paper and the reasons. At the same time, the author also needs courtesy and respect in order to maintain good communication with reviewers and journals.