Shaanxi Liu Juanhua's innovation is the highest expression of human talent and the wheel to promote the progress of human society. Throughout history, everyone who has made outstanding achievements dares to innovate. Dare to innovate, is a very valuable spirit, we should all learn. A story is written in the third small bench in primary school: Einstein, a world-famous great scientist, gave a poorly made small bench to the teacher after a labor class in primary school. The teacher was extremely dissatisfied, so he took out the first and second small benches from under the desk ... Einstein made the first small bench, why didn't he stop there and do it twice until he was satisfied? This is because of his innovative spirit. It is because of this innovative spirit that he became a world-famous scientist. About 2300 years ago, there was a great Greek thinker Aristotle, who thought that the speed of falling objects was directly proportional to their weight. About 400 years ago, the Italian scientist Galileo was not easily believed by what Aristotle said. He overthrew Aristotle's point of view through experiments and established the law of free fall: all objects fall freely at the same place, and the acceleration is the same if they are not resisted by air. With such innovative spirit, Galileo established the laws of free fall and inertia in physics and discovered the laws of projectile motion and shimmy. Some people say that the first person who used flowers as a metaphor for girls was unanimously praised as a genius; The second person who used metaphor was ridiculed as a mediocre person; When the third person still uses this metaphor, he will be dismissed as a fool. This statement is somewhat exaggerated, but the significance of praising innovation is an irreproachable truth. Hugo said well: "Even if you successfully imitate a talented person, you lack his original spirit, which is his genius. Let's praise the masters, but don't imitate them. Let's be unique. If it succeeds, of course it is good. What does it matter if it fails? " We should advocate innovation and dare to innovate, instead of following others' footsteps and absorbing their wisdom. Young friends, let's work hard while we are in our prime. May we keep innovating and creating! A brief comment on this essay on innovation is a typical argumentative essay with clear views, clear levels and a combination of reasons and examples. Focusing on the argument that "being brave in innovation is a very valuable spirit", the author selects two examples. Einstein arranged three small benches in a row, and Galileo overthrew Aristotle's old theory, indicating that scientific development cannot be separated from the spirit of innovation; Then quote Balzac and Hugo's famous words to further prove the theoretical importance of originality. The full text of the conclusion is bound and prayers are issued. Students who regard writing argumentative essays as an arduous task can imitate this model and then engage in horizontal and vertical strategies. The Golden Gate Bridge in the United States is famous for its magnificent architecture and imposing manner. Near the Golden Gate Bridge, there is a deliberately imitated curved bridge. Except for its appearance, width and practical value, it is better than the Golden Gate Bridge, but its popularity is far less than that of the Golden Gate Bridge. Someone said meaningfully, "This is the difference between the first and the second." What is the difference? The Golden Gate Bridge was designed and built after long-term thinking and brewing by designers. It has a unique style and is a bridge of innovation. The curved bridge is just a replica of the Golden Gate Bridge, an imitation bridge. Their forms are similar, but their connotations are quite different, because imitation is only a shallow thinking activity, while innovation is a more advanced thinking activity, so it is more advanced and more valued by people. It is innovation that promotes the progress of human society. It takes courage to innovate. Innovation needs to break the original imprisonment and take risks. There is no risk and no courage to imitate others' old ways. Zhang Daqian, who created a generation of landscape painting style, can copy the works of Shi Tao, a famous painter in the former Qing Dynasty, but he is not satisfied with these. He resolutely gave up imitating other people's works and created his own landscape painting method with infinite courage, which shocked the painting world. If he doesn't have the courage to stop "faking" Shi Tao and explore by himself, there will be a mediocre painter in the world, a master who will shine in the history of painting. Innovation requires a high degree of wisdom. Balzac said: The first person who compares a girl to a flower is a genius, the second is a mediocre person, and the third is a fool. Indeed, innovative works can always give people a refreshing feeling, because it has experienced human brain thinking activities, from quantitative change to qualitative change, which is the crystallization of wisdom. Imitation is just a superficial re-creation. If innovation is compared to writing an article, imitation is just turning it into type and printing more articles. But this does not mean that we should blindly refuse to imitate. Imitation is also a practical activity, from which people can get innovative inspiration and find innovative methods. But we can't just imitate. Qi Baishi once said, "If you learn from me, you will live as if I were dead." The word "learning" reflects the process from imitation to innovation. "Like" means being satisfied with imitation and not moving forward. If the designers of curved bridges "learn" instead of "imitate", there will surely be another miracle in the world. At present, with the reform and opening up, new things are constantly emerging. We need imitation, but we need innovation more. We should put down our burdens, start the machine, and build a bridge with China characteristics to a bright future with a hundred times of courage and innovative spirit! Brief comments link imitation with innovation, which makes writing more difficult, but the author has a lot of ideas about it. The article does not simply preach this and suppress that, but points out the difference in thinking level between them and affirms the value and importance of innovation. At the same time, it also points out that "people can get the inspiration of innovation and find innovative methods". The conclusion that "we need imitation, but we need innovation more" is objective and fair. The novelty of the opening example, the following examples and the accurate analysis when quoting all add a lot of color to the discussion. I hope these are helpful to you!