Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Thesis review
Thesis review
Paper comments are the evaluation and summary of paper quality and research results, which generally include the following aspects:

1. Thesis selection: evaluate whether the thesis selection has research value and practical significance, and whether it conforms to the development trend and research direction of the discipline.

2. Research background and significance: evaluate whether the description of the research background and significance of the paper is clear and clear, and whether it can arouse readers' interest and attention.

3. Literature review: evaluate whether the summary of the existing research results in the paper is comprehensive, accurate and in-depth, and whether it can reflect the author's academic literacy and research level.

4. Research methods: To evaluate whether the research methods adopted in this paper are scientific, reasonable, feasible and effective, and whether they meet the research objectives and problems.

5. Experimental results: Evaluate whether the data analysis and processing of experimental results are rigorous, accurate and credible, and whether they can support research conclusions and arguments.

6. Paper structure and writing: evaluate whether the paper structure is clear, whether it meets academic norms and requirements, and whether the language expression is accurate, concise and smooth.

7. Research achievements and innovations: evaluate whether the research achievements and innovations of the paper are outstanding and valuable, and whether they have academic influence and practical application value.

When writing a paper summary, we should pay attention to the following aspects:

1. Evaluation should be objective and fair: the evaluation process should be objective and fair, so as to avoid subjective assumptions and prejudice from affecting the evaluation results.

2. The evaluation should be specific and clear: the evaluation content should be specific and clear, and vague words and expressions should be avoided.

3. The evaluation should be based: the evaluation content should be supported by sufficient basis and evidence to avoid making evaluations out of thin air or making subjective assumptions.

4. Evaluation should be combined with reality: the evaluation content should be combined with the actual situation, considering the research background and conditions of the paper and other factors.

In a word, writing a summary of papers needs objective, fair, concrete, clear, well-founded and practical considerations, so as to accurately evaluate and summarize the quality of papers and research results.