If this is correct, then the black hole's horizon is three-dimensional. All the matter and radiation entering the black hole will remain in the three-dimensional horizon forever. This avoids many paradoxes related to black holes. Especially now there is no singularity, unless you want to regard the center of gravity as a singularity, but that is not a physical object.
I said above that there may be a second singularity, and this singularity may exist. This is what happens when you gradually shrink the black hole to zero. You can do this by removing mass. When a black hole contracts, its volume will inevitably decrease, which is obvious, and its mass will inevitably decrease. But its density and temperature have increased. If a black hole shrinks to zero, its volume and mass are zero, but its density and temperature are infinite.
Our universe can be well simulated as a three-sphere expanding at the speed of light. Such a universe begins with the second singularity. Although I doubt that such universes and black holes will be smaller than Planck's length.
Do black hole singularities exist? I am also convinced that they stem from a misunderstanding of general relativity. For example, an important paper by Stephen Hawking is Singularity and Space-Time Geometry published in 1966. On page 76, he talked about "such a strong gravitational field that even the light' coming out' from it is pulled back". This is not right. See the basic ideas and methods of Einstein's theory of relativity. This is why Einstein explained that light will bend, because "the speed of light is variable in space". Optical clocks go slower in weak light because they go slower in weak light. As Don Cox, editor of Physics Quiz, said, "Light will accelerate when it rises from the floor to the ceiling." Hawking doesn't know that in a strong gravitational field, the light emitted will not be dragged back. They are faster.
Time dilation increases with the increase of quality, although it is constant within its own framework, and it will never have time to form.
People tend to say that black holes can never form, because infinite time expansion means that nothing can cross the horizon. But this misses the trick. Black holes were originally described as frozen stars. See 197 1 Black holes in physics today, written by Remo Ruffini and john wheeler. He said: "In this sense, this system is a frozen star." It is worth noting that the black holes of frozen stars grow like hail. Suppose you are a water molecule. You landed on the surface of the hail. You can't cross this surface. But now you are surrounded by other water molecules and eventually buried by them. So, although you can't go through the surface, the surface can go through you. The same is true of black holes. You can't fall into the horizon, but if you fall into the horizon, you will soon find yourself on the wrong side.
How many trillions of years will our future be before the mass loss causes the black hole to explode at a relative moment?
When you carefully observe Hawking radiation, you will find that it lacks basis. It depends on the appearance of particle pairs, which didn't actually happen. Also depends on negative energy particles, but it is not. In addition, it completely ignores the infinite gravitational time expansion of the event horizon. Because on the horizon, the speed of light is zero. Note that light cannot be slower than this, so the horizon is a place where the speed of light does not change with space, so it is a place without gravity. So nothing will cause the singularity to collapse further.