"One thing, one discussion" is the basic training for learning to write argumentative essays. Here, "one thing" can be a thing, a story, a sentence, a phenomenon, an article, a movie, etc. It can even refer to someone's words, an action or a detail in an event, etc. The "one discussion" here refers to focusing on yourself from a certain angle.

Guide the writing process

First of all, sort out the main points

1. Basic writing. The article generally consists of two parts: narration and reasoning. Tell one thing first, then discuss it, express your opinion and explain a truth.

2. Basic structure: summing up facts-putting forward arguments-proving arguments-collecting the full text. The parts of "summarizing facts" and "putting forward arguments" are the "introduction" of the article, which requires writing and asking questions; The "proof argument" part is the "theory" part of the article, which needs to analyze and demonstrate the problem. This part can also add some materials related to reality; The "ending the full text" part is the conclusion part of the article and the part to solve the problem.

3. Writing skills.

(1) Analyze the material and find the correct argument.

The projection shows a piece of material:

After Einstein became famous, the king and queen of Belgium invited him to visit. At the appointed time, the king sent a palace car to meet him at the railway station. When the train came, the driver couldn't find Einstein, so he went back empty-handed and reported to the king that the professor had not come. But half an hour later, Einstein came wearing a dusty raincoat and a pair of old leather shoes. It turned out that the driver only looked at the clothes and didn't recognize people. Einstein came on foot.

Students can analyze the following arguments from the materials: ① Einstein lived a simple life; (2) The common fault of recognizing clothes but not people; 3. Look at the essence of the problem, don't stay on the surface phenomenon; (4) Einstein did not put on airs and was approachable; ⑤ After Einstein became famous, he focused on scientific career and did not pursue personal enjoyment; 6 pick up the station, especially people you don't know, so as not to be mistaken by driver Wang. Comparing several arguments, it is a bit far-fetched except that ⑤ the counseling materials are too general, and ⑤ the lack of individuality and the blind pursuit of profundity. Other arguments meet the needs of discussion. For example, if you talk about achievements according to ①, you can't have too high requirements in life; According to (2), it is vulgar and superficial to talk about judging people by their appearances; According to 4, it can be said that truly cultivated scholars will not be vain and will not care about details; According to ⑤, it can be said that a great scientist should put the public interest first and strive to benefit all mankind, instead of pursuing personal enjoyment.

(2) Clear attitude. Make positive affirmation and praise for beautiful things; For ugly things, we must clearly express negation and hatred; Reasonable analysis and enthusiastic help should be given to the incorrect words and deeds of classmates and friends, such as destroying the environment, copying homework, and treating people on birthdays.

(3) Thinking innovation. The matter itself is often multifaceted. If we think and analyze the same thing from different angles, we can dig out different connotations and get different views and opinions. We should try our best to expand our thinking and try to write new ideas from a new angle and at a new level.

(4) The combination of narration and discussion lies in understanding. Generally, it is straight to the point and introduces the events, phenomena or materials to be demonstrated around the argument; Then discuss the matter on your own and put forward your own views; Then choose an appropriate method to illustrate your argument.

(5) Pay attention to the internal relationship between matter and reason, and prevent replacing discussion with Syria.

Second, examples to prove.

On "Deception"

As the exam approaches, several boring guys in the class are discussing various cheating tricks. Although it only makes people laugh, it proves the fact that "cheating" in exams still exists in many schools to varying degrees.

Why do people cheat in every exam? In fact, this is not surprising. Cheaters just want to get high marks, teachers praise them and parents are happy. Some people are forced to take risks and muddle through because they are afraid of not being recognized by their teachers and being scolded by their parents. Cheating in exams is also called "peeking". In the eyes of some people, this is really a wonderful thing: I usually have a good time, and the exam only needs a little calculation. You can get high marks easily. Cheaters only know to use "fake scores" to satisfy temporary vanity, but they don't know that "a levee of a thousand miles is destroyed by an ant nest" Although a small derailment will not make him heinous, it has planted an ugly seed in his heart.

Not to mention the disappointment of teachers, the punishment of the school, and the eyes of other students after cheating was discovered. Even if you get away with it this time, are you really so practical? Can you promise it won't happen in the future? I once remembered that a classmate wrote down his feelings after cheating: "I have been living in extreme fear and my spirit almost collapsed." I am afraid to meet my parents, teachers and friends ... I finally know what is miserable. "

Yes, nothing is more gratifying than having an open mind, and nothing is more painful than feeling guilty and losing the trust of others; The vanity gained by lies will eventually be shattered. An American educator once said, "Students who cheat in exams will also cheat in work and marriage. What kind of society can we expect when the good quality of honesty has no place in a country? " When you step into society, do you also have to cheat with books and notes? Deceiving teachers and parents is not deceiving yourself in the end!

On the other hand, it is wrong for students to cheat, but can this only blame students? Shouldn't teachers and parents take some responsibility? Some teachers and parents blindly regard "score" as the only criterion to measure a student. Many students cheat under this pressure. Shouldn't this cause teachers and parents to reflect?

Once again, I advise you to study hard instead of trying your best to engage in "underground activities" in the exam. "Cheating" is an anesthetic, and we should stay away from it like drugs.

Students think and discuss the examples, confirm the basic writing methods, basic structures and writing skills summarized above, and get inspiration from them.