In people's minds, the concept of "judging heroes by success or failure" has long been a foregone conclusion. People think that whoever succeeds is called a hero, and if he doesn't succeed, he can't be called a hero, but I think this is not desirable!

If success is a hero and failure is a bear, then in the fierce sports arena, it will be reflected that winning a gold medal is a hero and a silver medal is not a hero, let alone a bronze medal. Isn't that nonsense? Are heroes really heroes based on success or failure? I think, no, as long as they win glory for their country, they are all heroes!

People often say that "victory or defeat is a common occurrence in military strategists" and "failure is the mother of success", so how can a small success or failure judge who is a hero?

If success is a hero, there is no denying that Qin Gui is a great hero, because he successfully betrayed the country and killed Yue Fei. Yes, he succeeded, so is he a hero? His series of successes have not been reviled by future generations! Yuan Shikai is also a very successful person. He successfully betrayed his country and became emperor, but his series of unscrupulous successes did not make him a hero! Is success really a hero?

If failure is not a hero, then Yue Fei in the Southern Song Dynasty will not be admired and called a hero by future generations! His life has not ended in failure. Although he died tragically, who can deny that he is a real hero? Gou Jian, the King of Yue, was once a loser, but he suffered a lot and finally defeated the State of Wu. Although he was once a loser, there is no denying that he is still a great hero. Mr. Zhongshan, despite the failure of the Revolution of 1911, the movement to protect the law and the movement to protect the country, still gained the reputation of a hero and the respect of future generations. Who can say that Mr. Zhongshan is not a hero? "1 1.3 Hengyang fire" entered a group of armed police officers and soldiers, and no one was spared. Don't they deserve to be heroes? I think their spirit has gone far beyond that realm. Are all heroes successful?

If it is desirable to talk about heroes by success or failure, then the word "hero" loses its meaning, so it is absolutely not desirable to talk about heroes by success or failure!

Is this enough? Not enough. There's another one.

It is not advisable to "judge heroes by success or failure"

In people's minds, the concept of "judging heroes by success or failure" has long been a foregone conclusion. People think that whoever succeeds is called a hero, and if he doesn't succeed, he can't be called a hero, but I think this is not desirable!

If success is a hero and failure is a bear, then in the fierce sports arena, it will be reflected (deleted) that winning a gold medal is a hero and a silver medal is not a hero, let alone a bronze medal. Isn't that nonsense? Are heroes really heroes based on success or failure? I think, no, as long as they win glory for their country, they are all heroes!

People often say that "victory or defeat is a common occurrence in military strategists" and "failure is the mother of success", so how can a small success or failure judge who is a hero?

If success is a hero, there is no denying that Qin Gui is a great hero, because he successfully betrayed the country and killed Yue Fei. Yes, he succeeded, so is he a hero? His series of successes have not been reviled by future generations! Yuan Shikai is also a very successful person. He successfully betrayed his country and became emperor, but his series of unscrupulous successes did not make him a hero! Is success really a hero?

If failure is not a hero, then Yue Fei in the Southern Song Dynasty will not be admired and called a hero by future generations! His life has not ended in failure. Although he died tragically, who can deny that he is a real hero? Gou Jian, the King of Yue, was once a loser, but he suffered a lot and finally defeated the State of Wu. Although he was once a loser, there is no denying that he is still a great hero. Mr. Zhongshan, despite the failure of the Revolution of 1911, the movement to protect the law and the movement to protect the country, still gained the reputation of a hero and the respect of future generations. Who can say that Mr. Zhongshan is not a hero? "1 1.3 Hengyang fire" entered a group of armed police officers and soldiers, and no one was spared. Don't they deserve to be heroes? I think their spirit has gone far beyond that realm. Are all heroes successful?

If it is desirable to talk about heroes by success or failure, then the word "hero" loses its meaning, so it is absolutely not desirable to talk about heroes by success or failure!