Chinese argumentative writing skills 1, the intention should be clear, profound and healthy.
Theme is the soul of the article and the author's writing purpose. If the author's writing purpose can't be expressed through the article, or if the reader reads the author's article and doesn't understand what the author really wants to say, how can he tell the reader? Then the theme of this article is not clear.
Such as: use? Happiness? For the topic, the topic has hints, and some candidates cover everything. About what? Hint? Everything is covered, including dedication is happiness, giving is happiness, maternal love is happiness, family is happiness, unity is happiness and so on. I want to say everything, but I don't know anything, and the theme is not clear.
2. Creativity should reflect the style of the times and society.
The idea is to reflect the spirit of the times and show the characteristics and styles of the times. History is developing, times are advancing, and each era has its social life content and specific and unique things that represent the interests of the people at that time. These things are embodied in the article, which forms the new theme of the article in this era and the new characteristics different from other eras.
Contemporary middle school students should have a keen sense of smell? Antenna? Constantly care about new problems, find new problems, and closely link your pen with the times, so that the theme will be valuable and the article will be innovative.
For example: use? The power of _ _ _ _? One of the candidates wrote? Change your mind? Give the power of different ideas? See the senior school? Take Xinyi of Nanchang cigarette factory as an example, because Nanchang cigarette factory can be in the new situation? Change your mind? Spend a lot of money to buy good technology and turn the original loss-making factory into a profit. The idea of the little author is to rebound the pipa, closely follow the characteristics of the times, and demonstrate that there is only? Change your mind? (that is, reform), there is a way out Only articles that can reflect the social characteristics of the times like this can get high marks.
3. Do you want to sing a hymn? Truth, goodness and beauty? , criticism? False, ugly and evil?
? Writing for the heart? From the article, we can see the author's outlook on life and world. Students must strive to improve their ideological level, arm themselves with Marxist theory, and make themselves have a correct outlook on life and the world. Only by writing can they praise and publicize? Truth, goodness and beauty? Criticize abandonment? False, ugly and evil? .
A candidate wrote an article entitled "The Power of God"? I didn't believe it at first? God? Once my sick grandmother went to worship? God? As a result, I hope my illness is incurable. After that, your own rights? God? The power of a grain of salt. My parents divorced at this time, and I was scared. I was afraid that my parents would really get divorced, so I went to worship? God? , beg? God? Bless, don't let your parents divorce, as a result, your parents really didn't divorce. Through this matter, it is indeed confirmed? God? The power of is enormous. Believing in God at an early age is bound to have a negative impact on the formation of the young author's world outlook in the future. This kind of article is not conceived correctly and should be criticized. Although the little author's writing style is good, he was sentenced to four types of writing because of his incorrect intention.
How to set up sub-arguments in Chinese argumentative essays? Three bogeys? 1, separate taboos? Look around, him?
The first element of argument setting in argumentative writing is that the argument must be central? Sub-argument is to interpret, expand or explain the central argument from several different angles, different sides or different levels, which is the concretization of the central argument. Therefore, it must be clear that the sub-argument is refined under the restriction of the central argument and serves the central argument; Then, when we set up sub-arguments, can't we leave the central argument? Look around, him? .
However, many students ignore the limitation of the central argument when setting up the sub-arguments of argumentative essays. Size? (what, why, how) to simplify the argument into one? Label? .
Discuss papers with propositions? This mountain looks higher than that one? New solution "as an example. After analyzing the connotation of the proposition, some students come to a conclusion that one mountain is higher than the other. Is it an endless pursuit of life? This view, this view belongs to? A new solution? However, when setting up the sub-argument, it is not decomposed closely around this center: ①? This mountain looks higher than that one? Our pursuit needs us to be down-to-earth; ②? This mountain looks higher than that one? Our pursuit needs our perseverance; ③? This mountain looks higher than that one? Our pursuit requires us to face setbacks directly. The setting of such a sub-argument, stealing the concept, changed hands halfway. On the surface? Size? Clear, but the nature ignores the restrictive nature of the central argument, so it can only be a kind of? Label? .
? This mountain looks higher than that one? What does this mean? Climbing this mountain, I think that one is higher. Are you dissatisfied with your current job or environment, and do you think other jobs and environments are better? Its main meaning is that when people are never satisfied, it is a derogatory idiom; So-called? A new solution? Is to dig out new ideas from the original intention and seek something worthy of recognition from the original negation, such as? Never being satisfied is a spirit, a pursuit? Wait, this is the core of this proposition, and it is also the viewpoint of our composition discussion. Based on this, what can we rely on? This mountain looks at another mountain, is it spirit? what's up Size? Divide the following juxtaposition points: ① Seeing the height of this mountain is an insatiable spirit; (2) this mountain looks at the height of that mountain, which is a spirit of Excellence; (3) this mountain looks at that mountain, which is a pioneering spirit; This is a spirit of striving for the upper reaches.
2. What are the taboos? The preface doesn't match the latter?
The second element of argument setting in argumentative writing is that several arguments should be divided into several aspects according to the same scale and standard, and these aspects should be in the same place. Starting line? In fact, it cannot be divided into several different aspects according to several different standards.
The common way to set sub-arguments in argumentative writing is to answer according to the central argument? What is this? Why? Or? How's it going? Which question to use depends on the central argument of the article. But it should be noted that we can only use one of the three questions? Which one? To be segmented, this is the same scale and standard, and two or even three questions cannot be used for segmentation at the same time; Otherwise, the argument we cut out will appear? The preface doesn't match the latter? Phenomenon.
Argument with propositions? Give your dream a chance to bloom? For example. This is a composition topic with clear thinking restrictions and strong Chinese flavor, which is difficult to examine. By analyzing the structure of the proposition, we can find the key point of the proposition. Give it a chance? , but not? Dream? The center is for us to talk? How can I make my dream blossom and bear fruit? . But in the actual writing process, we found that many students didn't revolve around? How's it going? To break down the argument. Such as: ① dreams are lighthouses that illuminate the front of the life channel; (2) To have a dream is to have the hope of life; Dreams should be realized by persistent efforts. On the surface, it seems to be three sub-arguments, but in fact these three points can't be sub-arguments, because they belong to? What is the function of dreams? And then what? How to realize your dream? Three different levels are divided by three different standards, and only the third point can directly connect with the central argument, which is what we mean? Sub-argument
The key to this problem is that the criteria for dividing arguments are not uniform. What about around the center of gravity of the proposition? Give it a chance? And then what? Dreams bloom? This metaphor, strictly according to? How can I make my dream blossom and bear fruit? This same standard can be used to divide the central argument, so it is naturally divided into the following levels: ① planting dreams with confidence; 2 irrigate dreams with sweat; ③ Cultivate dreams with wisdom; 4 harvest dreams with creation.
3. What are the taboos? Cutting or messy?
The third element of argument setting in argumentative writing is that several arguments should form a parallel or progressive relationship, and there should be no inclusion or intersection, otherwise it will easily lead to confusion in thinking and structure due to unclear boundaries between concepts. This requires us to carefully check the connotation and extension of several concepts contained in the argument, so as to ensure that these aspects are parallel or progressive.
Use 20 10 Jiangsu college entrance examination composition? Green life? For example. Are there any students here? Green life? Made a simple explanation and emphasis? Green life? After the importance, the following four viewpoints are put forward: ① Green life can bring us fresh air; (2) Green life is equal to healthy life; ③ Green living will keep us away from pollution and noise; ④ Green life, humanistic life and low-carbon life.
At first glance, the idea of the article is clear. However, what is the relationship between the four levels derived from these four sub-arguments? Is this a strict argument? After careful analysis, we can definitely say that these four aspects are basically not closely related, and these four aspects are not real arguments. Because the concepts in the four sub-arguments, big and small, concrete and abstract, are intertwined at will. Cutting or messy? On the surface, it looks layered, but in fact it is unclear, loose and messy. Step on watermelon skin? Suspected.