Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How to do argumentative reading comprehension
How to do argumentative reading comprehension
How to read an argumentative essay is as follows:

1. Argument (what to prove, you can answer "what is it") is the author's point of view, and the expression form is often a judgment sentence expressing affirmation or negation. There is only one central argument: the position is generally in, and the title is a complete sentence, which can often answer "What is it", such as "We China people have backbone", otherwise it is the topic.

Beginning: either directly put forward, or quoted famous sayings, enumerated phenomena or discussed in other ways, the sign word is generally "visible, therefore ……" End: If the article structure is divided into general types, the central argument is often put forward at the end. Sub-argument: used to supplement and prove the central argument. There can be n sub-arguments, often in the first sentence of a paragraph.

Summary: How the argument is put forward. Put the facts first, make sense, and then draw a conclusion; Cut to the chase and put forward the central argument; Put forward a topic for the phenomena existing in life, and summarize the central argument through analysis and discussion; Describe the author's experience and summarize the central argument; The author asks questions from the story, then analyzes the inference step by step, and finally draws a conclusion and puts forward the central argument.

2. Argument (with what proof, you can answer "why"): facts and materials used to prove the argument. Classification of arguments: factual arguments and rational arguments. Demonstration requirements: true and reliable, and the typical sequence arrangement should be logical; Consistent with the content of the argument and can prove the argument.

3. Demonstration (how to prove, you can answer "how"): the process and method used to prove the argument. Argumentation methods: example argumentation (citing method), reason argumentation (citing method), comparative argumentation (itself can also be example argumentation and reason argumentation), and metaphor argumentation (that is, metaphor is a metaphor in an illustrative text and a metaphor in a narrative text). )

4. The structure of argumentative paper. General form: introduction (asking questions) ontology (analyzing problems) conclusion (solving problems). Type: Parallel, Total Score, Total Score, Total Score and Progressive.

5. The argumentative language is rigorous, vivid, spicy and humorous.

Test sites and their answering methods:

1, for example. Cite the example of xx to prove the argument and enhance the persuasiveness of the article.

2. Reasoning. Whose speech was quoted, what was proved, and the authority was powerful.

3. reasoning. Whose speech was quoted, what was proved, and the authority was powerful.

4. Comparative demonstration. Through the comparison between xx and xx, the correct view is more acceptable to readers by highlighting xx.

5. Metaphorical argument. Compare what to what, explain what is easy to understand, easy to understand and easy to accept.