The zoo has been banned, and the tiger has not left his area. The only one who broke the rules voluntarily was this tourist. Although the punishment he received far exceeded his guilt (the crime of evading tickets did not lead to death), it was entirely his own fault. As the same kind, we naturally sympathize with the dead. This is at least humane, but we should not sympathize. Because China people's definition of the word "sympathy" naturally includes "speaking out about other people's experiences * * *", if you have always been a person who abides by the rules, you will not speak out to a person who breaks the rules so wantonly, because you will not replace his role, so * * * will not speak out and "sympathy" will not rise. Many netizens sneered at the dead. It looks really cold on the surface, but it can't be said to be inhuman, because it is a natural reaction under long-term pressure. The social reality in China today is that too many people violate the rules, even ignore them, and always get away with it. From talking loudly, smoking and spitting in public places to hitting high beams and changing lanes at will, it is difficult to be punished. The old man was lying on the ground and blackmailed by touching porcelain. The police station educated him several times. School violence seriously leads to children's mental disorders, and schools come forward to roll with the punches. In contrast, people who are afraid and obey the rules become victims again and again, and they submit to humiliation again and again, and their grievances accumulate little by little, while those who break the rules are unscrupulous. Finally, I met a rule breaker who was "punished" and was punished by a higher rule (the law of the jungle in nature). Even if this punishment is too severe, how can I "sympathize"? Everyone makes mistakes, but what is frightening is that some people take mistakes for granted. Adults are responsible for their actions. Unfortunately, there are too many "giant babies" around us. They are used to breaking the rules, being tolerant of others, being unpunished and irresponsible. The Badaling side also tried to make the person in charge of the garden pay compensation, which is an example. It is these people who consume the tolerance of society for the perpetrators. From this perspective, the victim is not wronged, but also very wronged. He is not unjust, because he broke the rules himself, and he himself is the perpetrator. He is very wronged, because he invisibly bears the accumulated stigma of all "rule breakers". It is true that this is a tragedy, and the victim deserves sympathy, but the victim, as the only perpetrator, must also be responsible for his own actions and is not worthy of sympathy.