Argumentative writing, also called argumentative writing, is a style of analyzing things, discussing things, expressing opinions and putting forward opinions. By presenting facts, reasoning and distinguishing right from wrong, the author can determine whether his point of view is right or wrong, and establish or deny a proposition. Argumentative writing should have clear thinking, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable arguments and strict logic.

Argumentative writing is a common style that takes argumentation as the main way of expression, and directly expresses the author's views and opinions by putting facts and reasoning. Using vivid narration to indirectly express the author's thoughts and feelings is different from narrative writing, which focuses on introducing or explaining the shape, nature, causes and functions of things, and is also different from explanatory writing. In a word, argumentative writing is an article that convinces people with reasoning, while narrative writing and expository writing are articles that move people with things and teach people with knowledge.

Argumentative writing is an expression in which the author analyzes, comments and persuades objective things to show his views, opinions and attitudes. It usually consists of three parts: argument, argument and argumentation. Argumentative topics are divided into topics, arguments and implications. The topic type is the author's point of view but concise, and the central argument cannot be copied directly. Argumentative and argumentative types generally have no opinion tendency, for example, a friendship between gentlemen is as light as water. Implication generally coexists with the theme argument and cannot be directly used as the central argument to restore the original intention.

Language features: ① accurate and rigorous; ② Generality and conciseness; (3) Use rhetoric to express its vivid, vivid and emotional words.

Argumentative writing is a style that analyzes and comments on a certain issue or thing and shows one's own views, positions, attitudes, opinions and propositions. The three elements of argumentative writing are argument, argument and argumentation. It can be divided into three parts: what to do, why to do it and how to do it. The proposition is a proposition to be proved.

High school argumentative structure

(A) point of view+transition+case+analysis

The most important thing in this step is "transition" and "analysis". The so-called "transition" is to connect ideas and examples with appropriate words, thus connecting the literary atmosphere and making ideas and argumentative materials unimpeded in language form. The so-called "analysis" means that after the case is described, it is necessary to make appropriate analysis and comments on the case, point out its essential characteristics, and link the case with the argument in content.

(2) viewpoint+transition+demonstration+analysis+induction

This way of argument is to add a "induction" to the first one. The so-called induction is to extract the inevitable from multiple examples. Since it is necessary to extract from multiple examples, the "argument" part should be two or more.

(3) Universal Truth+Individual Truth

That is, deductive reasoning. The previous analysis and induction is from the individual to the general, and deductive reasoning is a method to prove a special argument (argument) with universal truth from the general to the individual.

1 high school argumentative writing guidance

Well written

A good quality article, with disgusting handwriting, is often not rated well. Why? First, the words and papers are poor, and points will be deducted according to the grading requirements. Second, the "face" of the test paper controls the examiner's marking mood to a certain extent. Beautiful and neat writing is the best "coat" of an article, which directly and effectively forms the reviewer's scoring impression: First, the strokes should be clear. Clear strokes and correct fonts will leave a good impression on reviewers. On the contrary, the dragon and phoenix dance, all the way crazy grass, but it is difficult to identify, even if the article is written well, it is difficult for people to appreciate. Secondly, the font should be moderate. The font is too large, the volume is crowded, chaotic and indecent. The font is too small to read. Also, change it as little as possible. If you want to change it, you must also change it in a standardized way. Don't scribble, leaving eye-catching ink spots on the surface of the paper roll, causing a messy feeling.

Draw up a good question

The theme is the eye of the article and an important part of the article to convey important information. Being at the top of the article structure, the title of the article will directly affect the reviewer's first impression of the article. The basic requirements for the proposed topic of argumentative paper are: to be eye-catching and comfortable on the basis of accuracy. It can be vivid, vivid, concise, unique, neat and so on. In short, it is best to stimulate the reader's interest in reading, or to make him feel refreshed.

The title of an argumentative essay should conform to the stylistic characteristics and be clear, so that people can know its purpose at a glance. Articles with distinct views are most popular with reviewers, because they have a clear and transparent sense, can convey the general content of the article, and facilitate reviewers to grasp the basic content of the whole article accurately and quickly.

Typical and vivid arguments

Argument is the soul of argumentative writing, sub-argument is the skeleton supporting this soul, and argument is the flesh and blood of argumentative writing. It is inconceivable that a person should be full and colorful, with only a soul and skeleton and no flesh and blood. The same argumentative essay can't be called an article only with central arguments and sub-arguments, and it must also have typical and vivid arguments.

Typical arguments refer to representative examples and famous sayings that can fully reflect the essence of things. First of all, ask for truth and be related to the topic. Secondly, we should abandon the old arguments and use new ones. Some students memorized several classic arguments in their compositions, such as Sima Qian, Madame Curie and Zhang Haidi, and used them from different angles as a kaleidoscope. In fact, even if these arguments are typical, they are not noticeable. On the contrary, it will be better to choose the new argument that "people have me without me, and people have me", which will make commentators feel fresh when reading. In addition, some students are used to reasoning with ancient examples, and the whole article fails to connect with reality, has no running water of the times, and cannot achieve the purpose of full reasoning. It is best to quote fashionable sentences and examples that the media generally pay attention to to to assist reasoning, strengthen the pertinence and sense of the times of reasoning, and make the article more convincing.