I think journals should be responsible for academic fraud. The recent absurd paper can be said to have opened many people's eyes. The argument of this paper must be unheard of by many people. At first, I was surprised when I saw this paper. I can't help asking, can such an article be published in a magazine and circulated by so many people? Does it mean that no one doubts the problem of this paper and thinks that such a statement is completely impossible?

The title of this paper is that boiled eggs can be changed back to raw eggs and then chicks are hatched. This argument sounds ridiculous, even children may not believe it. However, it happened that such an absurd paper was finally published in a magazine. It can be said that the magazine that published this paper played a media role in spreading false information.

For many readers, it can be said that it is virtually misleading. For example, some readers trust some magazines and think that the articles that can be published in such magazines are basically trustworthy. It is based on this trust that readers will try their best to convince themselves of this absurd paper they have seen.

But in fact, this has misled the audience, so journals should be responsible for academic fraud. If a magazine like this can review such a paper when it is published and conduct its own research on its arguments, it is impossible for such a paper to appear in the magazine. Of course, it is also possible that this paper was published in this magazine in other ways, so this way should be condemned. Whether you publish a magazine actively or passively, you are responsible for what he publishes. If you publish this wrong information in your magazine, it is responsible for it.