There is little difference between the blind test and the non-blind test of the master of horse theory, except that the information of students and tutors is removed, so that experts can evaluate the thesis work more objectively. In fact, most experts have the same principle when judging, and treat workload, innovation and especially the authenticity of the paper fairly and fairly. If a paper violates academic ethics and plagiarizes, then such a paper will definitely fail, whether it is blind or not. If the work of the paper is of little value, such as repetitive work and insufficient innovation, the judges will give feedback for rectification, but it does not rule out the possibility of failure, which depends entirely on whether the work of the paper can be improved in foresight. Some schools will not allow papers to be revised and re-evaluated in a short time, even after half a year. So, you can be fully prepared. It doesn't matter whether you are blind or not. The key is that the work of the paper is substantial, true and meaningful, and there are innovations in technology and methods.