Focus on project evaluation, comprehensive performance evaluation, spot check and other aspects of assessment and evaluation:
(a) for basic research activities, pay attention to evaluate the quality, contribution and influence of new discoveries, new ideas, new principles, new mechanisms and other landmark achievements. The paper review should implement the representative system and reasonably determine the number of representatives. Among them, the number of papers in domestic sci-tech journals is not less than 1/3 in principle.
Strengthen peer review of representative works, combine quantitative evaluation with qualitative evaluation, and focus on evaluating their innovation level, academic value and influence, correlation with current scientific and technological evaluation, and contribution of relevant personnel, instead of taking the number of representative works and the level of influencing factors as quantitative evaluation indicators.
(2) For scientific and technological activities of applied research and technology development, we should pay attention to evaluating the quality, contribution and influence of new technologies, new processes, new products, new materials, new equipment, new standards, key components, experimental devices/systems, application solutions, new diagnosis and treatment schemes, clinical guidelines/specifications, scientific data, scientific reports, software and other landmark achievements, without taking papers as the main evaluation basis and assessment indicators.
(3) for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, we should pay attention to the evaluation of the quality, contribution and influence of the follow-up test, development, application and popularization of scientific and technological achievements until the formation of new technologies, new processes, new materials and new products, without taking papers as the main evaluation basis and assessment indicators.
(4) Encourage the creation of high-quality results. Relevant scientific and technological evaluation organizations and management units (institutions) can improve the evaluation weight of high-quality achievements in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Measures, and pay attention to the role of peer review in evaluation. The research results of "three kinds of high-quality papers" can be evaluated according to the high-quality results. Support provincial universities and research institutes to cultivate a number of journals listed in the China Science and Technology Journals Excellence Action Plan, and strive to build world-class science and technology journals.