Induction, namely inductive reasoning, is a dialectical thinking process from special to general. It is to extract things with the same nature from all or representative parts of specific things and synthesize them, thus summarizing the conclusions reflecting the general nature.

2, deductive method

Deduction, that is, deductive reasoning, is a dialectical thinking process from the general to the individual and from the universal to the special. It is based on the conclusion that reflects the general nature of things, studies individual specific things that have not yet been recognized, finds out their special properties, and thus deduces new conclusions.

3. Contrast method

Contrast, that is, contrastive reasoning, is a correct reasoning method to prove the argument by comparing and discussing different types of cases.

4. Similar

Analogy, that is, analogical reasoning, infers similar cases by comparing and discussing the same type of cases, thus proving the correctness of the argument.

5. Example method

The example method, also known as the fact argumentation method, uses detailed, novel and typical concrete cases, summarized facts and statistical data as arguments to prove the correctness of one's argument.

Step 6 introduce the method

Citation, also known as theoretical argumentation, refers to taking the basic principles of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, the educational principles, policies and regulations of the party and the state, the correct views and practical experiences of famous educational figures in various periods, and the scientific conclusions of modern educational theoretical works as theoretical arguments to prove the correctness of one's views.

7. Explain the method

Interpretation refers to explaining topics, arguments, quotations, keywords and key sentences, or inferring new conclusions from the definition of theorems according to general principles.