For medical researchers, if they have not made substantial contributions when publishing the project documents, they cannot be named at this time. We also think it's good for this matter. Because in the overall situation of medicine now, if we can't correct our name, it is also a result that we all very much hope to see. At the same time, as far as this regulation is concerned, its original intention is very good, because it can greatly reduce the occurrence of untrue phenomena and make us feel very good. In this case, in the whole scientific community, the impact is what we all want to see.

Therefore, all of us should pay corresponding attention to the occurrence of this matter, that is to say, if we can really solve this problem, it is also a good normative measure for the current medical research community and good for ourselves. Therefore, this also requires us to pay attention when doing the problem, which will have a bad influence on ourselves. So for the whole now, the evaluation of the paper and its overall situation still make us feel terrible and difficult to predict.

For medical staff, when they want to do corresponding research, they still need to do research by themselves, because for many scientific research tasks, they still need to work hard by themselves, and their knowledge is more and more comprehensive, so their results will be more reliable, so when they need papers, they will spend more time and energy on them and naturally get better results. And it can make more people understand that only through their own efforts can they get the results they want. Let them know that you can't get a name for nothing.

No matter what you do, you need to work hard. If you just hang a name, you won't lose your sense of accomplishment, and sometimes it will even cause imbalance in others' hearts.