First, the way to expose the facts. That is, seize the hypocrisy of the other party's argument and refute it with facts. For example, in the article "Are you happy with money? The author lists the facts of Marx, Curie, Schubert and Balzac. They all have no money but work for the happiness of mankind, so they are happy. Directly refuting the wrong argument with facts can be said to be righteous words and hit the nail on the head.
Second, hit the key method. That is to grasp the key points of the other party's argument, analyze and dissect, and expose its essence. For example, the theory of "Frightened Friends" wrote: "If friendly friends are surprised, our car house will be afraid ... and we can win the praise of friendly friends, and the country will go on forever." This passage hit the nail on the head. Since we don't want "the country can't be a country", why did the government quietly lose the three northeastern provinces? And the patriotic behavior of students is "the country will not be the country"? By comparing the two, the absurdity of the enemy theory and its true face of betraying the country are exposed. The author grasps this key point, dissects anatomy and refutes the "enemy theory".
Third, the theory is illegal. That is, independently demonstrate the opposing arguments of the other party. Thereby disproving the other party's argument is wrong. For example, Frugality is an argumentative essay, which combines argument with refutation. At first, the author did not directly refute the wrong view that "I can spend my labor income how I want", but put forward the opposite argument that "frugality is not only an economic matter, but also linked to ideological quality": on Lu Xun's robes for decades, on national cadres or advanced workers. When the correct viewpoint is established, the wrong viewpoint will also fall down. Fourth, debunk the law of lies. That is, pointing out that the other party's argument is nonsense, thus overthrowing the other party's argument. For example, when the theory of "friends are surprised" refutes the argument that students "destroy institutions and block traffic" ... social order and learn that they have been destroyed ",it quotes the news of Shenbao, confirming that it is a fact that a certain department staff member is seriously injured and a secretary is missing, but the students are suppressed and suffered heavy casualties. This way, the right and wrong are clear, and the truth is clear at a glance. As soon as the enemy's argument falls, the argument itself collapses.