The rejection of the preliminary examination usually means that there may be problems in the basic writing of the paper. If it is a basic writing problem, it shows that the quality of the article is really unsatisfactory, but the rejection of the first trial is not entirely a writing problem. Some articles are of high quality, but they do not conform to the research direction of the journal, or the journal has published articles with the same research direction and content. In this case, it does not mean that there is a problem with the quality of the article.

Therefore, if an article is rejected in the first instance, let's not jump to conclusions. Let's find out why first. The reasons for rejecting the article are different, and the countermeasures are different, aiming at the crux of the problem. Even if the article has obvious problems, it does not mean that it is hopeless to publish. Rejected articles are very common in the publication of papers. First of all, we should establish confidence in publishing papers.

If there are obvious mistakes or problems in the writing of the article, what the author needs to do is to modify the article. If the magazine gives suggestions for revision, it should be revised according to the suggestions. After revision, the author can choose to contribute again or change to other publications. If the research direction is inconsistent or the publication has published articles with the same research direction and content, it will be rejected. If it is not necessary for the author to modify it, the author can choose other suitable publications.

Therefore, it is not terrible to be rejected in the first instance, nor does it mean that the article is hopeless. The worst result is that the author rewrites or supplements a lot of experiments and data. As long as he is willing to work hard, the paper will always be published. For more questions, please consult the online editor of the topic station.